245
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 85 points 1 month ago

What a class act. It’s too bad the door swung so far in the other direction after he left.

[-] hate2bme@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago

I voted for him but hate how he talked shit about the Patriot act overstepping then extended it and took away even more of our rights.

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 91 points 1 month ago

Congress extended it. Obama simply didn’t veto it. Perhaps that makes him complicit but it sailed through the Senate in a 67-32 vote which is likely to never happen ever again and a veto would only get overridden by Congress, which makes a President appear weak.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

I wish a politician 'told us how it is' by relaying to us how it actually is. Like, the power structure and the way shit gets accomplished by government. We have no clue. People running for office have a jist of a clue. Those in power are burdened by the system. I wish we knew more about the system.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

the way shit gets accomplished by government

Well, largely, it doesn't. And the reason for that is because few people in the US government right now know how to operate a government.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Many in the government in fact don't want the government to operate.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Politics is the art of the possible.

Except that what's possible is waaaaaaaay less than you think.

[-] Whopraysforthedevil@midwest.social -5 points 1 month ago

Also, not a fan of him ordering the extra judicial killing of American citizens.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I'm fine with it, but only because those specific Americans were assholes and weren't in a place they could be taken for trial.

I wouldn't mind a trial in absentia, but I also understand time was a concern.

Before you say 'oh yeah, what about others in the future!?!?', everyone got that pissed over a few that pretty clearly deserved it, I'm not too worried about a potus drone striking random people at Walmart just yet.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago

The downvoters apparently are fans of that

It happens 🤷

[-] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

Yeah, the racists were pretty pissed about the whole... Having a black president thing.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

People are really sleeping on voting Harris just to make racists mad

Some people need a smaller goal they can relate to

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Make racists mald again, that's not a bad idea.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 15 points 1 month ago

I voted for him both times, he’s a really good speaker. Unfortunately, he’s a neoliberal corporate democrat just like all the others.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

Eh, just pushing for the ACA makes him generic liberal, not neo.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

ACA is the republican neoliberal healthcare plan yo

Or at least it was lol, once Obama got it passed and the republicans started literally speaking out against their own plan

A similar thing happened to Biden, where he embraced the republican immigration plan but then the republicans changed their mind and voted against their own plan lol

[-] Surp@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago
[-] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I miss sanity in politics.

Was shit perfect? Fuck no, but there was comfort in appearance of civilized debate. You could disagree with a politician, family member, or even stranger without calling their entire world view into question. I can remember when we agreed on the facts, and just disagreed on whose solution was best to fix the problem.

I'm too old for this shit.

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
245 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19145 readers
1955 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS