Not sure if its better, did both and i havent noticed much difference. Forgejo runs codeberg though and is maintained by them. Also has CI with forgejo actions.
My brother in christ, unix was all rights reserved. There was a non-compete agreement prohibiting at&t from selling their OS, hence why it was more or less given to universities. Later, the BSD's did a theseus ship, and at&t still tried to claim ownership through legal methods. For them, the license symbolizes this independence from at&t, which is why it doesnt lay claims on user protection.
Look, im not even going to respond the first part. I love the bsd's as well, from a technical standpoint. From a licensing standpoint, not so much (i see the value in a short license, though).
Im not concerned by what these companies use or do not use. Im concerned about protecting my, and other 'common good' software with a license that strictly prohibits user exploatation. The GPL does this perfectly.
The isc/bsd2 license does not protect the user
This is somewhat concerning, as im a big fan of working for free, as long as it benefits the users. I have also been looking at the EUPL as a happy middleground (it permits static linking, while any changes to the acual code is copyleft). Copyleft is important, and needs to be talked about.
For those wondering, this seems to be MIT licensed. I didnt check all components.
Proton is most certainly a mission critical Valve product. But, yeah, use whatever. I swear by Fedora.
all you ever get is bad faith debate
My fellow homosapien, the question is framed in the baddest faith imaginable.
?? Where source
I see op is fluent is stroke, much impress
I would also add IPFS, a REALLY cool piece of tech.
Some really interesting suggestions in this thread that i will definately look into when i find the time.
What is this shit? What are you implying?