[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Point taken. I assure you at least some of us are not going to shame others for choosing something other than Linux. We know it's not simple to switch and get a comfortable environment.

We're just willing to do the work for various reasons that feel important to us, and will gladly evangelize it gently.

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Admittedly, I've not been in the market recently. It is, however, the counter argument most frequently used to ignore the advice I stated.

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

And Cromite is my example of how the problem with Chrome is not the rendering engine tech, but the motivations of pthe people driving it. Cromite is an excellent alternative to gecko.

Back when I was very young, my software development philosophy was build your software on an Amiga 3000 and test it on an Amiga 500. Why? So that you can make it as efficient as possible while building it on the most user-friendly tools.

I still don't understand why this is not a thing. Just because memory is cheap and CPUs are fairly cheap does not mean we should just go blindly using it all up so we can spend more money on the next more powerful set of CPUs and ram.

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

... On the desktop. It's de rigeur for servers.

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Your points are valid, and if I saw this on a site like pcmag, medium or whatever, i would totally be on the same page. Still, how many "on the fence" people are likely to be here, on Lemmy, subscribed to a linux forum?

I chose to take it as snarky humor for the "in crowd". Benefit: keeps my blood pressure manageable.

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

That is the real altruistic, hopeful view, but there are downsides that I enumerated in my other comment. Here's another, though - With large scale acceptance comes a flood of people who just want a tool that works, not something they can build on or improve.

The greatest strength of this community is the love of the platform and the joy of exploration. Most are in it for altruistic or at least self enrichment reasons. Many are able to contribute when they see a gap. That can be diluted quickly.

Then the entrepreneurs see opportunities to make money from those people, and the enshitification begins.

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I'm a bit less nihilistic about it, though. I acknowledge the benefit if being a small enough "market" that the enshittification doesn't hit Linux like a tsunami as you alluded.

More users means more bullshit money grubbers, more dishonesty, more incentive for greedy hackers to attack.

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

I enjoy the snark, but also agree it's condescending. Folks, take it as cynical humor, and don't be so harsh.

Anyway I commented to say that #10 is creeping into at least some distributions.

My Ubuntu sends security updates that frequently impact system libraries and thus demands (politely) a reboot.

Gnome software does it all the time, but a regular "check for updates" will often install without demanding reboot. I suspect the update won't be in effect until reboot, though.

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

The cost of using a phone. "In love" is what I wrote and the keyboard decided I meant involve. Just to write this, I had to correct the corrections twice.

0
submitted 3 months ago by MasterBlaster@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The most affluent consumers account for a bigger share of total US spending, reinforcing the lopsided dynamic of unbothered consumption for the wealthy and more cautious shopping for everyone else.

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 65 points 2 years ago

I see they're looking to kill F-Droid.

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 60 points 2 years ago

They cannot celebrate his conviction because that would undermine their assertion that the trump trial was rigged.

In a twisted way, their reaction makes sense, and for me, was predictable. The cult must be constantly managed for it to remain intact.

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 153 points 2 years ago

I literally had this exact exchange with someone last year, when they tried to cast doubt on global warming by comparing it to the ozone. Another person did the same , using acid rain, and I pointed out that the northeast sued the shit out of the Midwest until they cut that shit with the coal fire power plants.

86
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by MasterBlaster@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

It's been a few years since I've needed to install a version of Windows on a PC for personal use. I have a license for Windows 10 Pro, but today I found out it is no longer possible to get through the installation without first creating an account with Microsoft.

I don't want to do this. Does anybody have any way to get around it? The stuff I've read online basically ends up being create your account switch to a local account after installation and delete your account. I want a better solution. Would installing a much older version of Windows 10 work? The whole reason I got an msdn license back in the day is so I didn't have to do this.

Edit: 10/2/2023

I thank you all for giving me advice and ideas. Much I had already tried before posting my question here, and some suggestions and experiences led me to keep at it. Here's my experience for others who have a similar problem.

I downloaded the ISO from Microsoft - Win10_22H2_English_x64v1. I used Ventoy to launch the installer. The first time I went through, I connected to Wi-Fi. As soon as I did that, it sealed my fate. By this time in the process, it installed the boot partition on my HD and saved this information so every time I tried to restart the installer, it always went through language, keyboard, then "enter email address". All the suggestions for fake values simply triggered "This email is already used. Please choose another", and that was it.

I was getting ready to wipe the partition and try again, but decided to turn off Wi-Fi in the BIOS first to see if that worked. It did. This time it tried to convince me to set up the network and failed and I was able to create a local account.

The way this multi-version installer works is annoying. It installed Windows Home edition, so I had to "know" that I could go to settings and enter a key. Once I put in the key, it "upgraded" to Pro edition, and I was done.

Next time I have to do this, I'll see if Rufus works. It seems that will remove some annoyance. Either way, I will avoid configuring Wi-Fi until after install next time. I gotta say, I am not looking forward to the day when I must upgrade to Windows 11. So far I've been able to avoid actually buying a new copy due to my aging MSDN key. By the time I'm forced to "upgrade", I might have to cough up some cash for something I don't want, but am forced to own.

It should be illegal.

Anyway, now that I know I can still use my MSDN key to get an updated Win 10, I feel a bit more comfortable with re-imaging my Dell laptop from dual-boot to Linux only, then install Windows as a VM for these times I need to use it. Fortunately, that is increasingly rare.

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by MasterBlaster@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I included a comment that is a prime example of how willfully blind people are concerning the value of privacy. This was part of a thread about a mews post of a person who had his Amazon Smart Home bricked because a delivery person thought he was racist.

It's a troubling read, because if most people really are this way, the fight for legally enforced privacy will fail.

What do you think of this?


Do you think they could have turned off the in the first place if they did not have personal details tied to those devices and full control of those devices?

Yes, assuming that we still need an input device of some sort. Because the input could make it give a different output, such as not running, even if it didn't know that you were the one it was blocking.

Maybe that couldn't cascade to all of your devices, but certainly the ones that received the input that caused them to brick themselves. But, then again in a mesh network they probably could send a brick signal to all co-networked devices.

What if someone decided to use something you did in the "privacy" of your own home to blackmail you? Embarass you? Would you feel safe?

I certainly wouldn't like that. Fortunately, those actions are illegal. The problem here isn't privacy, so much as it is blackmail.

It doesn't matter to me, if a passive recording picks up me doing something embarrassing. The thing that matters is using the data in the wrong way, or not having controls around the data.

What if something you do all the time suddenly becomes illegal and you could be prosecuted based on surveillance footage inside your home?

Well, I guess I'd better stop doing that thing or move. But, that is only marginally relevant to this case.

If you are a criminal, there will be evidence of the crime.

Do you think they cannot access the video and audio from those devices?

Sure they can, but passive access isn't a problem. The problem is using the data badly.

view more: next ›

MasterBlaster

joined 2 years ago