"Don't elect the other guy" campaigning is strongly incentivized by first past the post voting, unfortunately. Not that that's the sole cause, but... it's certainly not helping.
Doesn't take a "church boy" to not assault someone, dipshit.
I mean, going from this example it seems like everyone should be afraid of good guys with guns.
It is, and I'm fine with Evers using it to either secure school funding, or have the courts codify what the limits of the veto powers are.
Whoa, spoilers man, c'mon!
According to tv tropes, an either/or title: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/EitherOrTitle
Woo! Let's get less gerrymandered!
Back in Davenport, as Hannity wrapped the town hall, the crowd’s reaction left no confusion over how Trump’s town hall and his remarks landed.
They gave him a standing ovation.
I need an adult.
I can't understand why they wouldn't be disallowed from working as electors in any future election full stop. Limiting it like that seems like almost no consequence.
He didn't. This was a last minute payout by Twitter prior to the change in ownership. He's trying to not pay them retroactively.
I think using LLMs to provide the dialog for NPCs in a RPG is a use case that's just begging to happen. Ie townsfolk that don't just give the same few replies every time, and who react to things you've done in the past beyond just whatever prewritten options the developer thought of.