6
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world to c/firefox@fedia.io

For instance, 4:26PM instead of 16:26, I'm on linux (NixOS) if that helps.

1
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.world

For instance, 4:26PM instead of 16:26, I'm on linux (NixOS) if that helps.

11
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

For instance, 4:26PM instead of 16:26, I'm on linux (NixOS) if that helps.

7

I think the least that distros can do, is allow listing all packages and system settings in config files like .toml rather than having to type in every single package to install, or click through system setting GUIs to setup. Would that require using a whole programming language or system like NIx?

While NixOS works much differently from most distros, that's the only reason I use it: package and system settings in text files. If I fix something, it's fixed permanently, I don't need to hunt down files in random directories if I want to change a setting. If I ever need to reinstall the OS I don't have to write dnf install every single damn package and manually setup all that up all over again. Having daily-drove Windows macOS & Fedora as throughout the years, my setups have felt hacky as well as houses of cards as I've wanted or had to set them up again (I don't mean Fedora specifically, but distros in general).

Basically it feels insane that it's the way most linux users and servers in the world operate. If I, a humble computer hobbyist can figure out Nix, why don't more users do so, and why is Nix so niche?

0

I think the least that distros can do, is allow listing all packages and system settings in config files like .toml rather than having to type in every single package to install, or click through system setting GUIs to setup. Would that require using a whole programming language or system like NIx?

While NixOS works much differently from most distros, that's the only reason I use it: package and system settings in text files. If I fix something, it's fixed permanently, I don't need to hunt down files in random directories if I want to change a setting. If I ever need to reinstall the OS I don't have to write dnf install every single damn package and manually setup all that up all over again. Having daily-drove Windows macOS & Fedora as throughout the years, my setups have felt hacky as well as houses of cards as I've wanted or had to set them up again (I don't mean Fedora specifically, but distros in general).

Basically it feels insane that it's the way most linux users and servers in the world operate. If I, a humble computer hobbyist can figure out Nix, why don't more users do so, and why is Nix so niche?

1

I think the least that distros can do, is allow listing all packages and system settings in config files like .toml, rather than having to type in every single package to install, or click through system setting GUIs to setup. Would that require using a whole programming language or system like NIx?

While NixOS works much differently from most distros, that's the only reason I use it: package and system settings in text files. If I fix something, it's fixed permanently, I don't need to hunt down files in random directories if I want to change a setting. If I ever need to reinstall the OS I don't have to write dnf install every single damn package and manually setup all that up all over again. Having daily-drove Windows macOS & Fedora as throughout the years, my setups have felt hacky as well as houses of cards as I've wanted or had to set them up again (I don't mean Fedora specifically, but distros in general).

Basically it feels insane that it's the way most linux users and servers in the world operate. If I, a humble computer hobbyist can figure out Nix, why don't more users do so, and why is Nix so niche?

32

I think the least that distros can do, is allow listing all packages and system settings in config files like .toml rather than having to type in every single package to install, or click through system setting GUIs to setup. Would that require using a whole programming language or system like NIx?

While NixOS works much differently from most distros, that's the only reason I use it: package and system settings in text files. If I fix something, it's fixed permanently, I don't need to hunt down files in random directories if I want to change a setting. If I ever need to reinstall the OS I don't have to write dnf install every single damn package and manually setup all that up all over again. Having daily-drove Windows macOS & Fedora as throughout the years, my setups have felt hacky as well as houses of cards as I've wanted or had to set them up again (I don't mean Fedora specifically, but distros in general).

Basically it feels insane that it's the way most linux users and servers in the world operate. If I, a humble computer hobbyist can figure out Nix, why don't more users do so, and why is Nix so niche?

7

I want to see either a persistent rectangle box on the edges of the region being recorded (anything outside the box isn't recorded), or dim the parts of the screen that aren't being recorded. I looked for screen recorders for hyprland & wlroots and didn't find any with this functionality. wf-recorder + slurp works for me but I want a boundary visual.

1

I want to see either a persistent rectangle box on the edges of the region being recorded (anything outside the box isn't recorded), or dim the parts of the screen that aren't being recorded. I looked for screen recorders for hyprland & wlroots and didn't find any with this functionality. wf-recorder + slurp works for me but I want a boundary visual.

23
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I want to see either a persistent rectangle box on the edges of the region being recorded (anything outside the box isn't recorded), or dim the parts of the screen that aren't being recorded. I looked for screen recorders for hyprland & wlroots and didn't find any with this functionality. wf-recorder + slurp works for me but I want a boundary visual.

[-] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'll believe it if I see it.

[-] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Wine is successful because of the decades of work put into it. For Darling to reach that level of support it would need a herculean amount of effort as well.

[-] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Bad IT departments are a PITA.

[-] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

How the GPU support, does it support Metal?!

[-] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 90 points 5 days ago

it's the year of the linux desktop without the year of the linux desktop.

[-] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago

If containers are part of your work then you wouldn't buy a 8GB RAM unupgradable device anyway.

[-] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago

Well it helps that its open source & apple is actually encouraging contributions: https://github.com/apple/container

79
234
[-] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Aren't we all?! /s

[-] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago

It was a double-edged sword. While websites could honor it, it could also be abused as another data point for fingerprinting.

[-] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

removing ~~yet another~~ security ~~feature~~ theatre.

DNT was always just an honor system, and can be used as another data point for fingerprinting.

[-] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

SimpleLogin premium, with their domain. But I can't blame them for not wanting to ruin the simplelogin.com domain

view more: next ›

TheTwelveYearOld

joined 2 years ago