[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Since I have a poor memory, would someone please remind me why it is harmful for the working class to continue allowing production to fall under the consolidated control of oligarchs?

I know there must be some reason, but I seem to keep forgetting.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Different kinds of labor take different skills, not more or less, better or worse.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 55 points 10 months ago

I guess lying to employees about the law is just what families do.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 49 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think when one small group holds power, the effects for everyone else are usually shitty.

The issue may be more related to power itself, rather than to those who hold it.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago

If he owns vehicles, then he is entitled to exploit people to drive them.

The system has conditioned him to find a way to rationalize that he is victim.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 81 points 11 months ago

Laws protect business, not workers.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Workers form unions because they want to fight capital, not because they somehow have an option to take control of the workplace, but refuse to do so because they love their bosses.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Full time work being thirty two hours each week would be a compromise.

The defining principle of the systems under which we live is work or die.

No conditions under such a system would be ideal, and any would be a compromise.

Considering all the years that have passed since the Haymarket massacre, and all that has been sacrificed, fighting for thirty two hours is hardly radical or outrageous.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The population seems complacent to accept that employers seek unlimited power, merely because no other channel is available for earning one's survival.

No way of relating to an abusive system is ever considered, except capitulation.

In fact, I feel alarmed at how readily many will imagine some grave threat from a hypothetical coworker who uses substances, without ever considering the threat of abandoning one's own privacy.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

It is so important that we revitalize labor organization and practice mutual aid.

No one may survive alone, and no one should be alone.

Only by taking the workplace and reclaiming the commons may we escape the isolation and precarity forced on us by the systems that tower over us.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fortunately greater numbers are coming to realize that the Gates Foundation's function was never much more than reputation laundering.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

American workers historically have understood clearly that their antagonist is the capitalist class, who uses the hollow abstraction of "the economy", framed as an end in itself, to distract from its selfish pursuit of private accumulation.

It is time that everyone finally wake up and join the shared struggle.

view more: next ›

unfreeradical

joined 1 year ago