1
1
submitted 1 month ago by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.zip
2
1
submitted 1 month ago by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.zip
3
1
submitted 1 month ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.zip

Are your files going to be safer with Synology hard drives?

4
1
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.zip

Highlights of the complaint’s allegations

Discord’s Platform is Structured to Encourage Unchecked and Unmoderated Engagement Among Its Users

Discord designed its app to appeal to children’s desire for personalization and play by offering custom emojis, stickers, and soundboard effects, all of which are intended to make chats more engaging and kid-friendly. And it has created or facilitated “student hubs” as well as communities focused on popular kids’ games, like Roblox.

Once engaged, Discord encourages and facilitates free interaction and engagement between its users. Specifically, Discord’s default settings allow users to receive friend requests from anyone on the app—and to receive private direct messages from friends and anyone using the same server or virtual “community”—enabling child users to connect easily and become “friends” with hundreds of other users. Then, because Discord’s default safety settings disable message scanning between “friends,” child users can be—and are—inundated with explicit content. This explicit content can include user-created child sexual abuse material, messages intended to sexually exploit or coerce a child to engage in self-harm, internet links to sexually explicit content, images, and videos depicting violence, and videos containing sexually explicit content. In short, the app’s design makes it easy for children to connect with other users, but also allows predators to lurk and target them, undeterred by the safety features Discord touts as reasons that parents and users should trust its app.

Discord Misled Users About its “Safe Direct Messaging” Feature

From March 28, 2017 until April 22, 2023, Discord included “Safe Direct Messaging” settings in the “Privacy & Safety” menu of Discord’s “User Settings.” The settings purported to address how direct messages from other users will be scanned and deleted before receipt by the intended user. The Safe Direct Messaging setting contained three options:

  • Keep me safe. Scan direct messages from everyone.
  • My friends are nice. Scan direct messages from everyone unless they are a friend.
  • Do not scan. Direct messages with not be scanned for explicit content.

For most of the feature’s existence, Discord made the “My friends are nice” option the default setting for every new user on the app. This option only scanned incoming direct messages if the sender was not on the user’s friends list. For both the “Keep me Safe” and “My friends are nice” settings, Discord represented that it would “[a]utomatically scan and delete direct messages you receive that contain explicit media content.” But this was not true. Despite its claims, Discord knew that not all explicit content was being detected or deleted.

Discord’s Design Decisions Exacerbated the Risk to Children on the App

Combined with Discord’s deception about its Safe Direct Messaging features, Discord’s other design choices worked together to virtually ensure that children were harmed or placed at risk of harm on its app. For example:

  • By default, Discord allows users to exchange DMs if they belong to a common server. Therefore, a malicious user—adult or child—need only to join a community server, which could contain over a million users, to exchange DMs with an unsuspecting child user.
  • DMs among “friends” are even more dangerous. Discord’s default settings not only allow any user to send a friend request to a child, they also then permit those users, once “friends,” to exchange totally unscanned DMs through the default “My friends are nice” setting. Children can receive and accept friend requests from users whom they do not know and with whom they have no connection, and then engage privately on the platform without any oversight—all by design.
  • Users may also create multiple accounts to hide their activities and circumvent being banned from servers, or from facing other repercussions. And even if users are banned from a server, or from Discord itself, Discord’s design allows them to simply re-engage using a brand new, easily created account.

Discord Misrepresented That Users Under the Age of 13 Are Not Permitted to Create Accounts and Are Banned from Discord Upon Discovery

At all relevant times, Discord’s Terms of Service have stated that users must be “at least 13 years old and meet the minimum age required by the laws in [the users’] country.” To this day, however, Discord only requires individuals to enter their date of birth to establish their age when creating an account—nothing more. Discord does not require users to verify their age or identity in any other way. Simple verification measures could have prevented predators from creating false accounts and kept children under 13 off the app more effectively.

Nevertheless, Discord actively chose not to bolster its age verification process for years and has allowed children under the age of 13 to operate freely on the app, despite their vulnerability to sexual predators.

Simply put, Discord has promised parents safety while simultaneously making deliberate choices about its app’s design and default settings, including Safe Direct Messaging and age verification systems, that broke those promises. As a result of Discord’s decisions, thousands of users were misled into signing up, believing they or their children would be safe, when they were really anything but.

Discord knew its safety features and policies could not and did not protect its youthful user base, but refused to do better, the complaint alleges. In particular, Discord misled parents and kids about its safety settings for direct messages (“DMs”).

5
1
submitted 1 month ago by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.zip
6
1
submitted 1 month ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.zip
7
1
submitted 1 month ago by cobbland@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.zip
8
1
submitted 1 month ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.zip
9
1
submitted 1 month ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.zip
10
1
submitted 1 month ago by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.zip

A US judge ruled Google acted illegally to maintain a monopoly in some ad tech. This is the second time a judge ruled Google willfully engaged in monopolistic practices. The remedies for these rulings are still being worked out but may strengthen the case to have Google's business broken up.

11
1
submitted 1 month ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.zip
12
1
submitted 1 month ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.zip
13
1
submitted 1 month ago by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.zip

According to a newly released court document, NSO Group’s Pegasus spyware was used in a 2019 hacking campaign to target a total of 1,223 WhatsApp users across 51 countries, including the Czech Republic and Hungary.

14
1
submitted 1 month ago by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.zip
15
1
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.zip
  • UK-made, invisible radio wave weapon knocks out drone swarms for the first time.
  • Weapon has potential to help protect against drone threats as nature of warfare changes.
16
1
submitted 1 month ago by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.zip
17
1
submitted 1 month ago by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.zip
  • Open Rights Group investigation reveals fraudulent adverts offering fake driving licences and passports still running on Facebook.
  • Investigation is part of new report which examines how Meta’s surveillance advertising model enables vulnerable people to be targeted with disinformation, fraudulent ads and divisive content.
  • Meta monetises from migrant crisis through ads placed by both criminals and the Home Office.
18
1
submitted 1 month ago by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.zip
  • Temu and Shein will be getting more expensive come 25th April 2025.
  • The companies are blaming increases to their operating expenses thanks to sweeping export tariffs from the US.
  • Other international companies will likely be increasing their prices in the coming months, including for South Africans.
19
1
submitted 1 month ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.zip

Bug or migration strategy for New Outlook, we wonder

20
1
submitted 1 month ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.zip

LG licenses tech for interpreting TV users’ feelings and convictions.

21
1
submitted 1 month ago by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.zip
22
1
submitted 1 month ago by Makan@lemmygrad.ml to c/technology@lemmy.zip

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/7579524

What do you all think of this?

Video is only 6 minutes and 44 seconds long.

Project is called "Mouseless" and seems to be a keyboard mod.

23
1
24
1

Using design to empower children by making reading easier, improving comprehension, and helping dyslexics.

https://microsoft.design/articles/introducing-kermit-a-typeface-for-kids/

25
1
submitted 1 month ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.zip
view more: next ›

Technology

2464 readers
12 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS