Warning: non-transparent walls, window blinds and door locks prevent lawful interception and surveillance - how are the authorities supposed to know you're not doing something naughty in there?

Lol. Uh, good?

lawful interception

Idk bout that. Usually you get a warrant for wiretapping and then you pay someone to install it. If they are trying to break encryption or identifying users, that means they inherently are doing something the law does not favor.

Let's also acknowledge that if encryption is bad because it cannot be broken, that means encryption is pretty good at what it should do.

Breaking encryption is never something you do for the right reasons.

Cool let's add a backdoor to all routers and gateways, no way it would be exploited by our enemies

It's almost as if police need to get a warrant to wiretap people, and can't just do illegal wiretaps on unencrypted data. I can see why the EU may want to consider implementing processes for cross-border wiretaps, though.

Oh my! Encryption makes it harder to snoop uninvited into things that should not concern them in the first place! Shocking!

I fixed the bulleted.

• Home routing and encryption technologies are making ~~lawful interception~~ spying on innocent civilians harder for Europol

• PET-enabled home routing allows for secure communication, ~~hindering~~ preventing law enforcement’s ability to intercept and ~~monitor~~ spy on the communications of innocent civilians

• Europol suggests solutions such as disabling PET technologies and implementing cross-border interception standards to address the issue of Europol not knowing how to do their jobs without resorting to Orwellian dystopian techniques

• PET technologies does exactly what it's intended to do--protect the innocent civilian from the prying eyes of the not innocent bodies that are hellbent on eroding privacy and security

Oh no.... Anyway

Good! The government has no business in peoples' homes.

For those who aren't aware. This is talking about when cell phones roam into other networks, they now encrypt the traffic back to the home provider which means law enforcement struggle to tap it (legally or illegally).

PET is privacy enhancing technologies

Good, privacy is why they are being used. The government has plenty of legal ways to invade a person's privacy, perhaps they should consider using them.

AWWWWW, POOR FASCISTS CAN'T HACK OUR DEVICES

Because you know that's what it's really about, not "lawful interception". Fuck them.

Hold on while I dig out the world's smallest violin for them.

My main man, you deserve the wall for even attempting that shit, now you're gonna complain we're making it hard?

Good. Fk off governments.

I don't feel that intercepting traffic should ever be considered lawful.

If you need evidence, get a warrant, and take the equipment.

Think of the children!

Tough. Shit.

man, I do my homelab for hobby and better performance. this is bonus.

disclaimer: didn't read the article past the paywall fade out. and I'm too lazy to circumvent

Good

Good. 'Lawful' interception is total nonsense. They'd have a camera up everyone's ass if they could.

As it is our TVs bloody listen to us....1984 is here.

LMAO, the only way you're getting my OpenWRT router running FOSS U-Boot is by prying it from my cold, dead hands.

I get that that’s bad and that shouldn’t be.

But there just have been too many cases of unlawful interception (NSA and Criminal). So I personally don’t think we should move back away from encryption

Good!