270
submitted 2 months ago by 0x0@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
33
4

a22-65.akam.ne.

20

According to a DOJ press release, the FBI was able to delete the Chinese-used PlugX malware from “approximately 4,258 U.S.-based computers and networks.”

Details:

To retrieve information from and send commands to the hacked machines, the malware connects to a command-and-control server that is operated by the hacking group. According to the FBI, at least 45,000 IP addresses in the US had back-and-forths with the command-and-control server since September 2023.

It was that very server that allowed the FBI to finally kill this pesky bit of malicious software. First, they tapped the know-how of French intelligence agencies, which had recently discovered a technique for getting PlugX to self-destruct. Then, the FBI gained access to the hackers’ command-and-control server and used it to request all the IP addresses of machines that were actively infected by PlugX. Then it sent a command via the server that causes PlugX to delete itself from its victims’ computers.


The title is a bit blick-batey as it implies the FBI did it directly to said computers.

10
submitted 4 months ago by 0x0@programming.dev to c/linux@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/24130558

My Win10 work laptop has a network share of a remote windows server. I access it everyday. If i change passwords, i have to remap the share.

I have a linux vm that does the builds for my project. It too has a mounted directory mapped to that remote windows share, using my credentials.

I tried mapping the share in another linux vm but got errors so ended up quitting as it wasn't that important.

However, now i can't access said share in any device, by name or IP address. WTF happened?

The mount command i use in linux is mount -t cifs -o rw,relatime,vers=default,cache=strict,username=my.username,domain=,uid=118,noforceuid,gid=130,noforcegid,addr=10.10.10.10,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,soft,nounix,serverino,mapposix,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,echo_interval=60,actimeo=1 //10.10.10.10/dir1/dir2 /media/remoteshare, the UID/GID are of the user that runs the builds.

I'd get having errors on mounting the remote share, but i'd expect that to be limited to the local computer i was trying to mount on, not that it would propagate to any device that has this share mapped!

1
submitted 4 months ago by 0x0@programming.dev to c/windows@sopuli.xyz

My Win10 work laptop has a network share of a remote windows server. I access it everyday. If i change passwords, i have to remap the share.

I have a linux vm that does the builds for my project. It too has a mounted directory mapped to that remote windows share, using my credentials.

I tried mapping the share in another linux vm but got errors so ended up quitting as it wasn't that important.

However, now i can't access said share in any device, by name or IP address. WTF happened?

The mount command i use in linux is mount -t cifs -o rw,relatime,vers=default,cache=strict,username=my.username,domain=,uid=118,noforceuid,gid=130,noforcegid,addr=10.10.10.10,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,soft,nounix,serverino,mapposix,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,echo_interval=60,actimeo=1 //10.10.10.10/dir1/dir2 /media/remoteshare, the UID/GID are of the user that runs the builds.

I'd get having errors on mounting the remote share, but i'd expect that to be limited to the local computer i was trying to mount on, not that it would propagate to any device that has this share mapped!

2
submitted 4 months ago by 0x0@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

...surprising no one...

190
submitted 4 months ago by 0x0@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

The second step, which we still need to evaluate because some companies want it, and others are more hesitant, is to allow Anatel to have access to the core routers to place a direct order on the router

178
submitted 5 months ago by 0x0@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

Yet another case of just because you can...

3

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/22983650

I know that Android 14 requires targetSdkVersion >= 23 (or higher on the Play Store), but are there other minimums for this and minSdkVersion?

1

I know that Android 14 requires targetSdkVersion >= 23 (or higher on the Play Store), but are there other minimums for this and minSdkVersion?

10
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by 0x0@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

The Missing Nukes/Dirty Bomb Sweep Theory
The PSY-OP/Government Conspiracy Theory
The ET Theory
The Mass Hysteria Theory
The Copycats/Hoaxers Theory
The Iranian Mothership/Foreign Spy Theory
The Angels Theory

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 187 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Surprised Pikachu face...

IS-33e was the second satellite to be launched as part of Boeing's "next generation" EpicNG platform. The first, dubbed IS-29e, failed due to a propulsion system fuel leak.

I see a pattern.

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 159 points 7 months ago

Technical debt is the number one cause of developer frustration. Working with imperfect systems demoralizes programmers, making it difficult to do quality work.

I'd wager not being given time to tackle technical debt is indeed frustating...

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 85 points 8 months ago

So the EU's been forcing Apple to allow sideloading and Google goes Nah, it'll be fine?

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 92 points 9 months ago

Anglos can't help sexualizing nudity.

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 82 points 9 months ago

Try its fork forgejo instead.

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 93 points 10 months ago

decades of IT experience

Do any changes - especially upgrades - on local test environments before applying them in production?

The scary bit is what most in the industry already know: critical systems are held on with duct tape and maintained by juniors 'cos they're the cheapest Big Money can find. And even if not, There's no time. or It's too expensive. are probably the most common answers a PowerPoint manager will give to a serious technical issue being raised.

The Earth will keep turning.

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 90 points 10 months ago

Was the driver asleep or something? The car drove quite a bit on the tracks... sure, blame Tesla all you want (and rightly so), but you can't really claim today that the car has "autopilot" unless you're hunting for a lawsuit. So what was the driver doing?

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 208 points 10 months ago

We must cut all options for the end user to own anything, let'em pay subscriptions instead.

In a SONY board meeting, probably.

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 129 points 10 months ago

The vast majority of projects on GitHub is open-source and forkable, why would that need authorization?

It's... suspicious that China's doing it en masse, but there's nothing wrong in cloning or forking a repo last i heard.

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 79 points 11 months ago

Minority Report vibes...

view more: next ›

0x0

joined 2 years ago