I'm surprised it wasn't reallyblue
I don't see anything as having to come before learning Rust.
If something about Rust requires more technical knowledge, then that learning is part of learning Rust, even if you could have learned it separately beforehand.
Better start learning Rust to get in there instead of delaying, which adds risk to never arriving, loss of interest, or lack of progress on the goal of learning Rust, with a lack of satisfaction.
Once you learned Rust, you can look around to gain broader knowledge and expertise, if you want, but that's not necessary to learn and make use of Rust.
These terms included affirming the statement that we 'do not, and will not during the term of this financial assistance award, operate any programs that advance or promote DEI [diversity, equity, and inclusion], or discriminatory equity ideology in violation of Federal anti-discrimination laws,'
Insane. I can't even fathom adding such a condition. And to a well established org with a positive track record.
Toxic offer. Wouldn't even be able to say that inclusivity is a good thing.
That's a read-only mirror, not a "move onto GitHub".
PRs get automatically closed, referring to the contrib docs.
Codeberg published a blog post yesterday. They suspect (or know?) that it's a broadened attack because Codeberg hosts liberal and human projects.
In the past days, several projects advocating tolerance and equal rights on Codeberg have been subject to hate attacks, such as massive spam of abusive messages in their issue trackers. We have been monitoring the situation closely and have tried to clean up the content as quickly as possible.
Often, content remained available only for a few and up to 30 minutes. Due to constrained personal capacities, some rare cases have remained online for longer. We appreciate all your reports to abuse@codeberg.org that help us identify abuse quickly.
On 12 February 2025, an abuser has escalated the attacks to a next level. Instead of targetting individual projects, they have started to create abusive content and mentioned Codeberg users in chunks of 100 each.
(emphasis mine)
CrowdStrike ToS, section 8.6 Disclaimer
[…] THE OFFERINGS AND CROWDSTRIKE TOOLS ARE NOT FAULT-TOLERANT AND ARE NOT DESIGNED OR INTENDED FOR USE IN ANY HAZARDOUS ENVIRONMENT REQUIRING FAIL-SAFE PERFORMANCE OR OPERATION. NEITHER THE OFFERINGS NOR CROWDSTRIKE TOOLS ARE FOR USE IN THE OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT NAVIGATION, NUCLEAR FACILITIES, COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, WEAPONS SYSTEMS, DIRECT OR INDIRECT LIFE-SUPPORT SYSTEMS, AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, OR ANY APPLICATION OR INSTALLATION WHERE FAILURE COULD RESULT IN DEATH, SEVERE PHYSICAL INJURY, OR PROPERTY DAMAGE. […]
It's about safety, but truly ironic how it mentions aircraft-related twice, and communication systems (very broad).
It certainly doesn't impose confidence in the overall stability. But it's also general ToS-speak, and may only be noteworthy now, after the fact.
no no no, this is the wrong way around
because sales and marketing sell it before it even exists
DuckDuckGo
I scale by dropping requests
Turned into a skeleton in 10 minutes
The site name’s a play on “The Onion” so it’s gotta be satire, right? I couldn’t find an about page to confirm.
Yes, it's satire.
The page is run by one author https://www.theolognion.com/about and no description or goal described
Runs on "substack" platform (standard software)
The story reads like a story, and the mentioned company does not exist
!gamedev@programming.dev