[-] jounniy@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 days ago

The pearl does not get consumed though. Buy it once, use it indefinetly.

[-] jounniy@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 days ago

Statistically it comes up 5% of the time you use a hero point, so yeah, about as often as rolling a nat 20.

[-] jounniy@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I habe no idea what this is, but it sounds incredibly whacky.

144
92

For reference: There is a duell in the module where a shaman tries to secretly help one NPC by continously casting Cure Wounds on him while supposedly only helping him "stand up" after he intentionally let‘s himself fall prone. To spot this, a PC has to specifically declare checking for interventions a then suceed a DC 15 perception-check despite being within earshot…

[-] jounniy@ttrpg.network 18 points 4 months ago

Very much this. It even feels very "rogueish" to employ that strategy and it’s far from broken, so I don’t see why you would ban it.

[-] jounniy@ttrpg.network 18 points 4 months ago

Get's transported to a time where all Sphinxes have died.

142
So much potential! (ttrpg.network)
108
122
181
[-] jounniy@ttrpg.network 23 points 7 months ago

I know it’s a joke, but I'd say "mostly dead" is just when you roll death saves.

266
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by jounniy@ttrpg.network to c/rpgmemes@ttrpg.network
[-] jounniy@ttrpg.network 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No. If we assume that you have to target the wall it would at the very least stop after destroying the wall.

But by RAW, you can’t even cast it on something behind the wall, because you cannot target something (or someone) with a spell if they are behind total cover. Total cover is created by being completely behind an obstacle (like a wall). This counts even if the obstacle is invisible.

Furthermore, if you chose an invalid target for a spell, you still expend the spellslot but there will be no effect. So you'd actually spend a sixth level spell a lot to achieve nothing.

I would not recommend doing it this way, but that’s what the rules say.

[-] jounniy@ttrpg.network 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Oh definitely. I assume that RAI this is the intention.

367
150
[-] jounniy@ttrpg.network 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Probably. An author once wrote this piece of conversation:

"Wait? You can transform matter. Thats magic." "Your people can use metal to fly over buildings." "Of course they can. It makes perfect sense."

Having a world, where "magic" actually exist raises a lot of questions about some conventional expressions and cultural aspects.

143
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by jounniy@ttrpg.network to c/rpgmemes@ttrpg.network
35
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by jounniy@ttrpg.network to c/rpgmemes@ttrpg.network
[-] jounniy@ttrpg.network 34 points 2 years ago

"So what do you have? "

"A sword!"

"A sword?"

"Yes. And I can hit with it twice as often twice every hour."

"... I'll stick to my spellslots thank you."

"... It sounded better in my head."

-49
[-] jounniy@ttrpg.network 44 points 2 years ago

Never show this to my players please.

[-] jounniy@ttrpg.network 26 points 2 years ago

Something tells me that this will be the favorite picture of many people… I am not among them of course.

view more: next ›

jounniy

joined 2 years ago