18
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Elissa Slotkin can fuck off.

Detailing her plan, Slotkin – a former analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency…

Oh, she can really fuck off.

Edit:

“I can’t do what she does because we live in a purple state, and I’m a pragmatist,” she concluded.

This is code for not rocking the boat.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

So abandon economic justice and civil rights.

Is there anything left?

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

The color blue, instead of red.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GrassCat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Elissa Slotkin IS the oligarchy. She is the Hot Dog Princess. Her grandpa owned BallPark Franks—subsidiary of the Tyson Foods megacorp. Every time someone eats a hot dog, Elissa gets more passive income than most folks earn from a year’s labor.

[-] Blackout@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago

She sucks, I voted for Harper in the primaries but the Dems are full of neo-libs like her. It's hard to see that party go more liberal even with Sander's and AOC's help

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Let's get back to our controlled opposition roots.

[-] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

First part of article title is a bit misleading I think. She thinks "Kings" is a better term than oligarchy because it's more relatable. She has a plan to fight kings. She does seem to think wokeness is weak though.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) has urged her Democratic colleagues to stop attacking the “oligarchy” on Thursday, arguing that the word did not resonate with most Americans and should be replaced with “kings.”

Detailing her plan, Slotkin – a former analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) – argued that the Democratic Party needed to lose its “weak and woke” reputation and “fucking retake the flag,” adopting a “goddamn Alpha energy” inspired by Detroit Lions coach Dan Campbell.

“She said Democrats should stop using the term ‘oligarchy,’ a phrase she said doesn’t resonate beyond coastal institutions, and just say that the party opposes ‘kings,'” wrote Wren, who reported that Slotkin was planning to deliver a series of speeches in the coming months about her plan.

[-] blaggle42@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

Somehow this made it worse. “goddamn Alpha energy” - who are these people. All I want is for the dems to not be rich people faking concern for the poor.

[-] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

People recognize when they're being talked down to, this is a losing strategy.

[-] Birch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

God fuck this woman

[-] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 6 points 1 month ago

The Democratic Party is so full of collaborationists. Just shows how democracy and capitalism are incompatible. The bourgeois class just buy the politicians.

[-] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

She’s sorta right. ‘Oligarchy’ is a big college word that Joe Bumblefuck doesn’t understand.

Aristocrats is a good word, but again: “duh?”

Therefore Dems just need to start harping about “rich fucking parasites”

[-] slappypantsgo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

People are clued in on oligarchy even if they don’t quite know the exact definition. After Bernie and AOC started their tour, it was Wikipedia top 5 articles. Slotkin is just a right wing traitor.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago
[-] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately shes in the right party for this BS. This is what the Dems have been for decades. We need a new party, not a new democrat.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] UnculturedSwine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Dem Senator Says Party Needs to Stop Attacking ‘Oligarchy’ and Focus on Losing

FTFY

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

"Don't let perfect the enemy of good."

The "good":

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Put her near the top of the list to be primaried.

[-] mcv@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Way to advertise what side she's really on.

[-] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

"Not resonating with voters"

Bernie and AOC's "Fighting Oligarchy" campaign is pulling in more people to their rallies than attended Obama's in 08.

Don't peddle that horseshit you Liberal traitor.

[-] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

She's so full of shit. The number 1 issue in every 2024 poll of swing voters was the economy and inflation. That's why Trump won. When people think the economy sucks, the incumbent party almost always loses.

All this bullshit about "woke" is just another attempt by the ultra wealthy to distract from economic issues, because they know the solutions for them hurt their bottom line. She and her GOP allies will do anything to stop us from improving labor rights and economic conditions for ordinary people.

She's a lying weakling backstabber.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, she can fuck off.

The oligarchy is killing us, and spinning language won’t change that. Meanwhile, ‘woke’ just means ‘social empathy’, which is ironically the solution to many of the problems the oligarchy is causing (and they’re not shy about this – Musk recently said empathy is bad).

We need more ‘woke’, not less. And being butthurt that the fascists are using ‘woke’ as a slur against us is childish and easy to ignore if you’re not too simple to get it.

Fuck this. I’m woke and proud of it. We all should be.

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

And this is why fascism is winning.

[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yep. When the 'resistance' grand plans are to adopt the fascist framing (e.g. that 'woke is weak' and should be surrendered) what's the point in having an opposition party?

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

what’s the point in having an opposition party?

To co-opt and prevent real opposition.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Maybe the democrats need to ditch pro-oligarchy anti-woke members 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

I am sure this slide to the right will surely work.

The unfalsifiable orthodoxy. Moving to the far-right and appealing to moderate Republicans win elections. If a Democrat wins, it proves that this works, if a Democrat loses, they just hadn't moved far-right enough.

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Of course. They don't want to fix things, they just want to be the ones getting the benefits.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
18 points (87.5% liked)

politics

24243 readers
1249 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS