57
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Captain_J@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Wow! I've always wanted a browser that would track everything about me! /s

[-] mdd@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Gotta get me some of that.

[-] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Do all these dickheads go to a school to learn the same specific hand gestures?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KenLin@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

I appreciate him saying it upfront. Makes it easy to stay away from all of their products.

[-] MudMan@fedia.io 19 points 3 months ago

I hate when people post hyperpartisan reporting because it makes me do homework. In this case, you made me listen to almost an hour of a three hour podcast with three techbros chatting about techbro crap in techbro ways. You owe me years of life.

Anyway, so the conspicuously missing context here is he's asked if they will let go of the subscription model and go after an ad business model instead and he responds "hopefully not" and clarifies that he thinks the AI differentiator from Google search is that it doesn't feed people ads.

He then transitions into saying that you'd need a super hyperspecialized profile for it to make sense and then maybe it could work but they haven't figured out long term memory well enough for that, which is when he talks about why they'd want to have a browser to build that hyperspecialized profile.

This is my least favorite type of misinfo, too, because he's actually kinda saying what they say he's saying, just out of context. But more importantly, because he says some other shit that is more outrageous, too. For example, when explaining why he thinks the subscription business will grow more than the ad business the way he puts it is that "people see it as hiring someone", so they're more willing to spend, and he ponders "how much do people pay for personal assistants and assistant managers and nannies?" and suggests that they'll provide similar services for cheaper to people who can't afford human help.

Which may not be as clickbaity and I get he finds it positive-on-the-aggregate, but is certainly some cyberpunk dystopia stuff that didn't need the out of context quoting to be a thing.

[-] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

Thanks for you sacrifice and service (it does sound like, but it is NOT sarcastic)

[-] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 months ago

You owe me years of life.

Best I can do is an upvote and a hearty thank you.

Thank you!

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

Thank you!

There is an implication, though, that they intend to collect as much data as possible regardless of which model they use? And in the article, he isn't selling any data, I think. Any mention of that?

[-] MudMan@fedia.io 6 points 3 months ago

To be clear, they ARE building an AI-forward browser and he is very plain about collecting a ton of user info. The way it's presented in context is that they intend to plug it in to their assistant/agent thing and surface relevant stuff to you on searches (which is the potential ad opportunity the article quotes as if it was the sole goal). But yeah, the implication is that they are collecting data regardless, even if the user profile ends up being used to cater AI responses to you specifically, to train models or whatever.

Hearing the guy talk about it I get the impression that he envisions an Apple-like ecosystem where they're constantly ingesting data and you're paying them to have their AI services act as a personal assistant and handle purchases and booking for you directly and so on, on top of anwering queries.

I would rather clip my toenails with a rusty chainsaw, myself, but that seems to be the idea.

[-] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

A scholar and a gentleman!

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

We need more people like you, thank you

[-] Kyouki@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago
[-] calmnchaos@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

In other news, Perplexity has signed a deal with Motorola to have the browser preinstalled on their phones.

[-] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Thx, for the heads up. The only reason I'm not typing this on a motorola g85 is because I got distracted when I was ordering it. Now I've got to search for a different brand.

[-] cmrn@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

That’s like a cigarette brand marketing themselves as the most cancer-causing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

When using my current browser, any guess as to how often I've said to myself "I need a browser that spies on me more"?

[-] CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Beep boop, this is your browser speaking. You have stated that you need a browser that spies on you more one (1) times.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

And people would voluntarily use this browser ....why?

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago

Weirder things have happened. Like people using Brave voluntarily.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] peetabix@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

What a stupid name for a company.

[-] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 months ago

Why would I use such a browser?

[-] latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago

"Because it really gets you, y'know?"

[-] raltoid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They've partnered with Motorla and probably Samsung to have it pre-installed. And a lot of people stick to the default one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] postnataldrip@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Srinivas believes that Perplexity’s browser users will be fine with such tracking because the ads should be more relevant to them.

Believes it, or is just spinning it that way?

You could show me an ad for exactly what I want in that moment and I'd immediately not want it any more.

Enough already.

[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

You could show me an ad for exactly what I want in that moment and I’d immediately not want it any more.

Depends, if it is an ad for an orbital laser that targets marketing executives it might work on me.

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Where is the hacktivism when you need it? These companies need to be gutted from the inside out.

Begin, the AI wars have.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

This is really good information, now I know to avoid their browser like the plague.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

These fuckers are just so delusional and out of touch with reality. Personalized ads my ass. We've been promised those for decades but pretty much all the ads I see on YouTube are from major retail chains with precisely zero relevance to me. They will show the ads of whoever pays for them. Your personal preferences are only relevant when it comes to targeting you with political propaganda.

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

I don't fucking want personalized ads no matter how relevant they are to me. I only have so much money to buy stupid materialistic bullshit and once that's gone all an ad can do is make me want something I can't have. Ads are just trying to make you discontent.

They just want you to spend more money in a failed attempt to be happier adding complexity to my life when I'd rather just be content with simplicity. And they work really fucking well on my wife. I automatically distrust anything someone is paying money to show me.

[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I am perplexed at he. Why the hell would I want this?

[-] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

I think I read somewhere they want to buy Chrome from Google if they are forced to sell. So not many changes, just switching owners who ultimately do the same thing.

i’m not a Chrome user, so screw both google and perplexity.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
57 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

73700 readers
887 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS