38
1986 saw the release of both the Henson / Bowie film Labyrinth and the Ravensberger board game Labyrinth. What was going on in the zeitgeist that created these two seemingly unrelated classics? (slrpnk.net)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by Nemo@slrpnk.net to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.ca
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Neither seems to be inspired by the other, but share a lot of imagery and mechanics. Do they both owe a common precursor? Or is it the collective unconscious at work?

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] athairmor@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

The 80s had a lot of fantasy and occult themes going on. There was the “Satanic Panic” that the religious right brewed up as a means of social control. Dungeons and Dragons was vilified (see Mazes and Monsters starring Tom Hanks). Heavy Metal—which leaned into mythical themes—was also targeted. And what the right tries to push down naturally gains interest in a rebellious way. Fantasy movies had a bit of a heyday. Conan the Barbarian, Clash of the Titans, Never Ending Story, Princess Bride, Willow, Dark Crystal, etc.

It probably helped that special effects were starting to get sophisticated. D&D had more exposure because of the religious panic. A lot of early computer/console games had fantasy themes.

So, they were both probably children of the zeitgeist. It was a weird time. Stranger Things does a pretty good job of capturing the vibe.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

And the tie-in here is that traditionally, the labyrinth is a religious tool used for meditation. Unlike a maze, a labyrinth follows a single path, with places to stop and reflect.

So the re-use of the term to represent both the minotaur’s labyrinth and a story/game with a single conclusion following many twists and turns makes perfect sense for the time. Both the game and the movie were able to use all the religious symbols associated with the labyrinth and re-purpose them for a different story. But it meant they were both able to use a well established iconography and symbology that many people in the 1980s would be unfamiliar with.

[-] Paragone@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

Remember that personal-computers, and therefore programming were just becoming significant, then..

Programming is labyrinthine..

It was part of the zeitgeist, back then

( so was the cult of impersonal-money, among other people, etc..

There wasn't any "single" zeitgeist,

but rather different cultures each had their own, & coding is nothing, if not labyrinths of logic )

this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
38 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

2770 readers
1 users here now

There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!

Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!

Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice 🍉.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Kokomheart@lemmy.ca
otter@lemmy.ca