385

The Grace Hopper Celebration is meant to unite women in tech. This year droves of men came looking for jobs.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 164 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This really sounds like a failure of the organizers more than anything- first off, lumping in non-binary is a catch all that anyone will take advantage of, and second and most importantly, everyone was complaining about long lines. Long lines means lots of people. Lots of people means the event over-sold their $600-$1000 tickets.

Sounds like the event organizers were more interested in making money than helping women in tech- women would have had the same problems had it been 100% women.

Edit: I’m not bashing non binary people, I’m just saying that people will take advantage of it, that’s all.

[-] LinuxSBC@lemm.ee 89 points 1 year ago

Including non-binary people was not the problem. Relevant quote:

"AnitaB.org, the nonprofit that runs the conference, said there was “an increase in participation of self-identifying males” at this year’s event. The nonprofit says it believes allyship from men is important and noted it cannot ban men from attending due to federal nondiscrimination protections in the US."

They identified as male, not non-binary, and the event allowed men to come.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago

Tangentially related, but are job fairs even worth it? In my limited experience, you wait in a long line for someone to tell you to apply online. I was better off getting a list of employers who were attending, and then looking through each of their websites.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think I figured it out... only rarely you'd get immediate interviews, but the idea is you get LinkedIn contacts to chat with later and industry insight, and something to tell recruiters/hiring managers that you did, but you dress it up in a way that shows you look for opportunity like "I met members of [industry/company] at a recruiting conference in [town]". I found industry conferences to be more useful than jobfairs in this respect, but those can be a little to a lot expensive.

Otherwise it's pretty much just being told to scan QR codes, business cards and maybe getting a couple plastic cups and pens.

All in all I say job hunting is such an awful game.

[-] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No. Mostly you run around collect business cards and then go online to apply for the jobs.. that you could have done without going to the job fair in the first place.

TBH It's a huge red flag if a recruiter wants upfront payment with no guarantee at the end of it (or even if they 'guarantee' one). If the recruiters are so desperate for someone they want to organise a job fair, they can bloody well pay for it themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 81 points 1 year ago

I like how this comment section highlights why a job fair specifically not for cis men is needed lol

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] endhits@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

This comment section is a perfect example of how capitalists have won the class war. Such hatred for half of the population of the world that people seem to have forgotten that people need jobs to survive.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] _s10e@feddit.de 59 points 1 year ago

Ignoring gender, are job fairs overrun by job seekers now? Is it that bad?

[-] Otome-chan@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

Tech is overcrowded as a field and it gets worse each year. So yes.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tory@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All of those are limited resources to which you have no right,” White said.

But then earlier:

The nonprofit says it believes allyship from men is important and noted it cannot ban men from attending due to federal nondiscrimination protections in the US.

So... We'd like to discriminate against men and would conversely see no problem if someone else hosted male only hiring events...?

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] sudneo@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

How dare workers in (potentially desperate?) need of a job to look for jobs. They are men and belonging to that category automatically makes them rich and privileged. The working class should be united against common enemies, not divided because of gender. While it's obvious that women in tech are discriminated, alienating fellow victims, even if males, is not the answer to the problem.

Capital really won the class war...

[-] bjornsno@lemm.ee 116 points 1 year ago

I know you didn't mean it like this, but the result from this line of thinking is that we only try to put women on equal footing with men in tech when it's convenient for men because times are good. Which in turn means we never put women on equal footing because the needs of men always come first.

Put differently women have to deal with being women in tech on top of times being desperate, men only have to deal with times being desperate. Things like this are why spaces like these are necessary in the first place, and if you break them down at the first discomfort you're not a working class hero fighting the capital, you're tearing down women and setting everyone back.

[-] sudneo@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Gender is absolutely not the only nor the most important discriminating factor in tech. Being a foreigner and, probably most commonly, being old is an extreme disadvantage in tech. Similarly, a woman coming from a wealthy family might be a privileged compared to a man coming from a poor background (which translates into lower access to education, resources, etc.).

Look at the video in the article, and tell me you don't notice some commonalities among the men in the queues.

I see mostly foreigners, who most likely have no network of support, and need a job to maintain a VISA before getting kicked out of the country. Are they in a better or worse position compared to a local woman? Does it even make sense to start asking these questions?

I want to challenge this vision where discriminations are only looked at through the lens of gender division. This is shortsighted because discrimination on the workplace is extremely diverse and it exists for the benefit of those same sponsors of this event.

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As a teenage girl into coding, I was treated like absolute shit. If I made a mistake in my botball code, it was because I wasn’t good at coding. If a boy made a mistake in their botball code, then it was something that the other boys would help them debug. I remember it being assumed I just wouldn’t be able to figure out what structs were, so the boys running the botball code didn’t teach me. In college, any group project was an opportunity for boys to try to fuck me.

As a trans man, someone who has experienced life as both a man and woman in STEM, there are massive barriers to women. It’s invisible to you because you haven’t lived through it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Zerfallen@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

No one is saying gender is the only point of discrimination, but this specific event is focused on gender issues.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 27 points 1 year ago

I've had a lot more foreign male colleagues than I have female colleagues. Where are you getting you information about who's disadvantaged?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[-] athos77@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

They are men and belonging to that category automatically makes them rich and privileged.

Privilege doesn't mean that things are easy or automatic, just that (in general) people with privilege don't have the same systemic negatives that those without it have. And it's very indicative of privilege for the men who went to this thing, which was built up over a number of years by a community specifically to benefit the members of that community, to just assume they had the rights of a community member without ever having contributed to that community. Something exists, and therefore they are automatically entitled to it.

I can have sympathy for people desperate for jobs, and I can understand class warfare, and yet ... once again something that women and enbys spent years and decades building up, is ruined because cishet men decided it was more 'convenient' for them to invite themselves into spaces not designed for them.

And yes, I do get frustrated with men not understanding issues of consent, in all of it's different aspects.

load more comments (37 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] JasSmith@kbin.social 41 points 1 year ago

Cullen White, AnitaB.org’s chief impact officer, said in a video posted to X, formerly Twitter, that some registrants had lied about their gender identity when signing up, and men were now taking up space and time with recruiters that should go to women. “All of those are limited resources to which you have no right,” White said. AnitaB.org did not respond to a request for comment.

Who picks their gender identity? The individuals or Cullen White? If anything this underscores the insanity of identity politics. If gender is whatever an individual feels like, then this event was just thousands of women and non-binary folks, and White needs to stop being such a bigot. However I think most of us understand that this is nonsense.

[-] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Gender is indeed based on what an individual feels like. That's a perfectly reasonable way to categorize people - it's also for example what religion is based on. It's just hard to implement systems where you give different rights to different genders when there's no way to check what gender someone is besides asking them. Probably the best solution is to just treat people the same regardless of gender so nobody has an incentive to lie.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 38 points 1 year ago

Most of the problems mentioned in the article seemed to be problems with the convention organization and not the attendees.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Layoffs are what caused the long queues to begin with. Event organization and operation makes it seem closer to an average American Black Friday event than a job conference.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If we had proper public supports for people between jobs, students and immigrants looking to find a way to live and/or not get kicked out of the country, this wouldn't be a problem.

The whole job hunt feels like a rat race, it's practically common recruiter advice to apply for stuff that you don't qualify for on paper, send out as many applications as possible and take every chance you can get. So I can see how people can apply these ideas to participate in spaces where they aren't encouraged to apply.

This is compounded by the pressure put on people to even live without income for short periods of time.

I'd say I'm privileged, yet it took me a year of looking to land something in my field. I had money saved up and enough supports to keep costs at a minimum, I'm aware I'm lucky I was even able to be in this circumstance.

We need smart and capable women, trans and nb people in the workforce, and we need resources to overcome the barriers they face. I'm just saying that it's not easy, even without such barriers and also with comforts that are not afforded to many.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

I have to sayings I give to my students.

In times of high unemployment: "Be overqualified for the job you are applying to. If you are not, you competition will be."

In times of low unemployment: "If the recruiter picks a name out of a hat among those who applied, your chances are 1 divided by the number of applicants. Find the average number of applicants that apply to jobs you want - that is the average number of applications you have to send out before you find a job. (E.g.: Online WFH jobs with good pay sometimes get thousands of applications)."

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Neato@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

ITT: men who can't ever admit they might be the problem. So many excuses here it's pathetic.

edit: I love the "not all men" and "not me". As always, it's not all men. But it's enough. And the men here getting so defensive really prove the point. And before anyone gets into it, it's not really the sex or gender. It's the societal expectations and allowances that encourage men to engage in abusive shit like we see in the article here. I.e. the patriarchy and those who support it.

[-] 01011@monero.town 42 points 1 year ago

Can you expound on that statement?

It sounds as if the organizers were too quick to take the $650 from attendees and those willing to pay were very eager to pony up the cash in the hope of networking.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] sudneo@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Problem for what?

I exist, I need a job to live, I have job, I try my best not to be an asshole, I fight (and vote) for a better society, for social and civil rights.

Why exactly I - since I am a man I feel included in your statement - should be THE problem?

[-] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I try my best not to be an asshole

Maybe people are getting too in the weeds with this because muh culture war

But it is an asshole move to show up to an event meant for one group of people when the original issue is how over represented your group is. I'm a developer. The grind sucks. But I would be an asshole to show up to this.

load more comments (44 replies)
[-] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

seriously this happens a lot people will go off and say word for word that a whole group of people are evil and bad when its a subset of a group. When called on it they may simply say that its not talking about the group as a whole or “not for you” if they dont genuinely believe the whole group is bad (which is wrong and discriminatory)

The issue is the discrepancy of what you say in relation to what you mean will lead others to believe in what you say but not what you mean and this harms those just trying to survive normally.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[-] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

From the title I thought this was an article about men driving vehicles into people at the job fair. I was slightly aghast that the discussion was only about whether or not it's ok to have a job fair for women in tech.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago

I can't wait for this to be posted on Hacker News, get 5 of the worst techbro libertarian nonsense comments, get 3 angry SJW replies to those techbros, then dang shouts at the SJWs about tone, rate limits them, then flags the article off the site.

/it me, I'm the SJW.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Landmammals@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

No one wants to work anymore!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Trev625@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

Purely commenting on the TikTok and not the article:

"... career fair aimed at women and non-binary tech workers..." and then there's a TikTok that says "A conference for (wo)men by women" and "the allies are totally allying"

So do only female presenting nonbinary people count?

(I know if you read the article that it says there was an increase in the number of self identifying males but how would the TikToker know that? The TikToker is just looking at the crowd and assuming that the place is overrun with men without actually checking if they're NB.)

[-] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

That doesn't seem like a job fair for women, but rather a job fair for everybody except men...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] alienanimals@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People in the comments: Discrimination is bad! (Except when it's against a group of people I don't like)

It's a shame these people can't understand the flaw in their logic. More discrimination is not the answer.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
385 points (87.8% liked)

Technology

59623 readers
2198 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS