198
submitted 10 months ago by Catma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] klu9@lemmy.ca 107 points 10 months ago

Which will result in retaliation against US movies, thus further undermining the US's unparalleled soft power.

This man is doing literally everything Putin could ever want.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 24 points 10 months ago

And probably demanded

[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Yup. The US has exerted far more power via blue jeans and culture (movies, music) than it has with bombs.

[-] einlander@lemmy.world 66 points 10 months ago

Movies and TV shows are the US's cultural export. It helps keep us front of mind. They are essentially asking for retaliation where the US is erased from all foreign screens.

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago

As a non American, that kind of sounds like a good thing tbh. US cultural exportation is why the MAGA right is popping up all over the west

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I mean, I would think it's the billionaire financiers that are directly funding the right, but the movies probably don't help.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago

It might be a "good" thing, but it is an incredibly stupid thing for a US president to cause, that is unless they're trying to undermine the power of the US.

[-] Steve@communick.news 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Another "Trump said" that should be ignored.

How would this even work? Tariffs function by holding the physical items in customs, until the tax is paid. But a licensing deal on a digital good, that can be transfered undetected over the internet, is impossible to teriff. You could tax it other ways, but 100% of what. The distribution license? The copyright?

I guarantee he hasn't thought about any of this, and as such this mindless utterance a can be safely ignored.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 10 months ago

The more logical choice would be to tax the distribution license sold by non American entities.

The thing that makes this unenforceable is that what he means is that he wants to tax movies not filmed fully in the US even if they are American movies.

[-] Steve@communick.news 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sure I'll accept I got all the details wrong. That doesn't really matter to my point.
My point is that this is another example of him saying something so stupid, that it shouldn't get any media coverage.

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Sure I'll accept I got all the details wrong. That doesn't really matter to my point.

This made me chuckle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

This guy is playing a board game and losing to a toddler.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Embargo@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago

For someone that said he explicitly doesn't like losers, he sure can embody one.

[-] andallthat@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The US being by far the biggest exporter of movies, the only way this makes sense is that Trump is not seeing enough ass-kissing (and ~~bribes~~ campaign donations) from the US movie industry, so he's actively trying to damage them.

Claim foreign movies are a threat, wait for other countries to retaliate against US movies, sit back and watch ~~bribes~~ sales of $TRUMP grow as the major studios seek his political favor.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Relax. Hell backtrack on them in 3 weeks.

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 months ago

After destroying the USs reputation (even further), but before collecting any meaningful value/revenue.

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 2 points 10 months ago

And other countries to add American movies to the list of things to retaliate with.

[-] PixelTron@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] k0e3@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago

How would that even work? At what point do you charge the tariff?

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

That's a good question. Everything is digital nowadays, so it's not like we're getting film reels from Bollywood.

If I had to wager a guess, the cinemas would probably be paying the tariff at the time of acquiring the license to show the film.

[-] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

Explain to me how the fuck does this fix the economy?…

[-] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

Making people poorer helps the rich get richer

[-] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Ah yes that correct!

[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Not when retaliatory tariffs come up

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I don't think that's what he's trying to do.

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

I think this is good. It will help local (outside the US) artistic industries space to flourish without being threatened by Hollywood.

Movies all over the world face inmence pressure form competing from Hollywood, buy without that pressure, they could focus on their local strengths instead.

Yeah USians are probably fucked though, but it's kinda bad to feel bad for the facists and their enablers.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

i don’t really see how… it’ll make movies from outside the US more expensive inside the US, but it doesn’t effect the price of US movies elsewhere

… without retaliation from many other countries of course, but idk if that’ll happen really: europe has kinda gone with retaliating in other areas: specific to applying pressure rather than broad

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I didn't vote for him. But fuck me anyway I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Uh, ok, what?

Are we trying to drown out foreign influence now? Like, idk, China? North Korea?

Media is our biggest GDP dollar. Donnie is playing with fire here. I'd bet my life savings he backs down, like he has on everything else.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

On some level this is a good thing. Many American movies are low level oligarch propaganda (e.g. The "Tony Stark" character in Iron Man).

We shouldn't be funding what is essentially a proto-fascist state. While there are many sane Americans, they have yet to prove that they have the risk tolerance to fight back effectively. From my experience living in the US, American culture isn't really suited for that kind of thing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Pnut@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

I was under the impression that they film a great deal of movies in Canada because it costs far less than filming anywhere else. We also have places that look very modern while maintaining very gothic cities and all of the land in between that could be filmed to look like many places abroad. So he's costing the film industry the savings that they have gotten used to by filming in Canada. Art of the deal.

[-] bmancer@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Tons of Hollywood films are shot in Hungary! Dune being one of them, but there's many many more. Cheap extras, cheap studio space and VFX industry.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 10 months ago

Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, he said: "Is it where the money comes from? The script, the director, the talent, where it was shot?"

These are the important questions to asking. I imagine there won't be strict definitions of "US made" films instead it will be a "vibes" based criteria used to punish people who go against the Trump Administration's policies.

[-] reptar@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

It's another control gate on the economy that he can manipulate. He is basically finding ways to insert himself in his amounts of commerce. It's a trump tax via bribes

[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 10 months ago

Can we make sure that we define non-US movies as any movie that's got a primary non-US investor? So that, given the amount of money China has poured into Disney, it makes them non-US? And all the Chinese film companies that have been sniffing around and snapping up productions that should be US based?

[-] Deadeyegai@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Unrelated but the "W" in the Hollywood sign is asymmetrical.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Apart from the point that this would be illegal (he won't know or care, but it is), imagine other countries responding in kind? At least our country imports more media from the US than we produce on our own. And the return tarrifs costs and losses caused by that would also hit primarily US companies like Netflix, Disney, Amazon, AplleTV...

[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

There would be retaliation and Hollywood exports far more than the US imports with entertainment. This would cause much more damage for the US film industry.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

China and many countries are huge consumers of American movies and entertainment.

Let them retaliate up the wazoo. We deserve everything we get. It just sucks that us non-magas have to suffer for their idiocy.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
198 points (97.1% liked)

News

36529 readers
382 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS