Palworld had to remove game features because of Nintendo lawsuit (www.pocketpair.jp)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Pro@programming.dev to c/gaming@lemmy.zip

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

On November 30th, 2024, we released Patch v0.3.11 for Palworld. This patch removed the ability to summon Pals by throwing Pal Spheres and instead changed it to a static summon next to the player. Several other game mechanics were also changed with this patch. As many have speculated, these changes were indeed a result of the ongoing litigation.

Furthermore, we regret to inform our players that with the implementation of Patch v0.5.5, we must make yet another compromise. From this patch onward, gliding will be performed using a glider rather than with Pals. Pals in the player's team will still provide passive buffs to gliding, but players will now need to have a glider in their inventory in order to glide.

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] XaetaCore@lemmy.xaetacore.net 29 points 2 months ago

Nitendo is pathethic for this

[-] Goretantath@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago

Can't wait for modders to mod it back in.

[-] NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com 2 points 2 months ago

I wondered about this. Would they be in violation if these were mods made by them that they received no additional payment for? Does it matter if it’s released officially or by individual accounts of the devs?

Thankfully Nintendo can’t do shit about every day modders.

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Oof.

No more gliding with pals. You need to have a glider. Gliding buffs still work though.

[+] Pika@sh.itjust.works -8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

and just like that, my temporary negative review just became permanent(at least until mechanics get changed back), Heavily against allowing bullying like this, especially broad patents like these. Nintendo doesn't own the tamed creature industry, despite what it thinks.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

So you gave a negative review to a game that's more or less forced to make changes because of a different shitty company?

[-] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I put a negative review for a company making their game worse, because that's what they did.

The fact that they did it without a court decision saying "yes defo in the wrong here" didn't help the decision making process. Especially when it's clear that the patents are under selective enforcement.

I am firm in my decision, a game as big as palworld was, just bending over backwards to a patent bully like Nintendo doesn't deserve a good review, and nobody is going to change my mindset on that.

When the court hearing is decided, and if it's decided palworld isn't in violation, and they change the mechanics back again, I'll fix my review, until then my experience with the game was dampened so therefore the review stays.

[-] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

"Allowing bullying"

You walk up to kids that got their face punched in on a playground and tell them to quit being a little bitch, too?

[-] Pika@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't think I understand your argument here.

I think a better comparison would be am I going to feel bad for the kid who got punched in the face with padding on, then decided that getting punched in the face was OK so they removed the padding. And the answer is firmly no.

To add clarification to better see what I mean:

The fact that they changed anything before legal proceedings finalized, with the fact that it's clear that what Nintendo is chasing after is being selectively enforced because other games have run the same mechanics, for example Ark survival evolved had the glider mechanic from a creature you tame long before Pokemon ever did, means that I lost most respect that I had for the studio. (disregarding the fact that they are known to abandon their IP before completion)

And honestly the fact that they are already working on the next game without this one being finished tells me all I need to know about whether or not they're going to fight this legal battle or not.

My fanboying over having an Ark x Pokémon game can only go so far, I'm not going to congratulate a company for bending over backwards to the playground bully, they had an amazing thing going, and I appreciate what they did, but they threw in the towel the moment Nintendo decided they didn't like it and as an effect it made their game worse and as such now has a review reflecting that

[-] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

You're a fool.

this post was submitted on 08 May 2025

40 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

3710 readers

122 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!

Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

No NSFW content

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:

Respectful Communication: We strive for positive, constructive dialogue and encourage all members to engage with one another in a courteous and understanding manner.
Inclusivity: Embracing diversity is at the core of our community. We welcome members from all walks of life and expect interactions to be conducted without discrimination.
Privacy: Your privacy is paramount. Please respect the privacy of others just as you expect yours to be treated. Personal information should never be shared without consent.
Integrity: We believe in the integrity of speech and action. As such, honesty is expected, and deceptive practices are strictly prohibited.
Collaboration: Whether you're here to learn, teach, or simply engage in discussion, collaboration is key. Support your fellow members and contribute positively to shared learning and growth.

If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Demigodrick@lemmy.zip

Sami@lemmy.zip