76
submitted 2 weeks ago by floppakid@feddit.org to c/trees@lemmy.world
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

So, is the implication the one you might expect, that the "gateway drug" effect is real but due to having to buy it from sources that might sell other illegal drugs?

As the team reports, problematic consumption decreased slightly in the group with legal access to cannabis. Consumption is considered problematic if it causes or exacerbates health, social or psychological difficulties—even without dependency in the classic sense.

In particular, a more substantial positive effect through legal access was seen in people who used other drugs in addition to cannabis.

This part is a little confusing, like how do they tell what is the cause of difficulties? Do they mean these people were still buying other black market drugs in addition to getting weed from a pharmacy? If so what would be the reason for the improvement?

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

very cool they have some data on this, but we should acknowledge that they did not have a control group of abstaining participants. so they demonstrated that psychologically not breaking the law has fewer deleterious effects than breaking the law, that's very cool. criminalizing substance use is a fucking disaster. but we still need to examine whether cannabis use does harm

[-] Flagstaff@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It has been repeatedly verified to dish out mountains of less harm than alcohol does. That alone should already tell us where priorities lie.

Alcohol vs. Edibles: Is One Worse for Your Health Than the Other? (March 2025, so recent)

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Flagstaff@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

If it was then it wouldn't be so much more prevalent and widely available. Any argument made against cannabis, a federally illegal drug, because it causes harm should be triply made so against alcohol, a legal drug that has annihilated many more millions of lives than cannabis ever has or will.

I'm saying if you're (generic "you") checking for damage to try to make a case against it, you should be investigating a lot of other, worse stuff, not this.

this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
76 points (97.5% liked)

Trees

7357 readers
114 users here now

A community centered around cannabis.

In the spirit of making Trees a welcoming and uplifting place for everyone, please follow our Commandments.

  1. Be Cool.
  2. I'm not kidding. Be nice to each other.
  3. Avoid low-effort posts

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS