19

A massive aviation industry clearinghouse that processes data for twelve billion passenger flights per year is selling that information to the Trump administration amid the White House’s new immigration crackdown, according to documents reviewed by the Lever.

The data — including “full flight itineraries, passenger name records, and financial details, which are otherwise difficult or impossible to obtain” for past and future flights — is fed into a secretive government intelligence operation called the Travel Intelligence Program and provided to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other federal agencies, records reveal.

Details of this program were outlined in procurement documents released Wednesday by ICE, which is a division of the Department of Homeland Security.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 5 points 1 month ago

I drive everywhere. Yeah, I know, fuck cars. But honestly they're tracking everyone's movement. Have you noticed all of the intersection cameras that have popped up everywhere? Fuck the authoritarian surveillance state.

[-] moseschrute@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

They don’t need cameras. Your phone is constantly connecting to cell towers and broadcasting its unique identifier. Those towers keep a record of who has connected. So long as your in range of 3 or more towers they can triangulate your location.

[-] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 1 month ago

True but I don't like having my phone on me when I don't want to be reachable. Sometimes it's turned off at home.

[-] nuko147@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The company is jointly owned by nine major airlines, most of which are US-based: Delta, Southwest, United, American Airlines, Alaska Airlines, JetBlue, Air Canada, Lufthansa, and Air France.

I hope EU starts some investigation, because it doesn't seem this follows the GDPR for European travelers.

[-] mriswith@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lufthansa and Air France might have some massive fines incoming.

[-] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Maximum GDPR fine is 4% of your revenue. For Lufthansa, that would be ~$1.4 billion, Air France ~$650 million, both of which are roughly their entire net income for one year.

Not sure if anyone has been hit with the maximum ever though, as everyone just keeps track of the dollars and not percentage of revenue.

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago

AFAIK no one has triggered the biggest fines (yet?). Can't wait for it to happen.

[-] mriswith@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think the biggest one by value is Meta with €1.2b. Although their revenue is in the $150b+ range, so not maxed out.

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Air Canada

Wtf Air Canada? Air France too

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 0 points 1 month ago

Assuming the data doesn't include international departures or arrivals (only their domestic counterparts), would GDPR even apply?

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 0 points 1 month ago

I think it applies to eu citizens worldwide for online purposes. You only need to do business in eu with eu clients (seperate terms) for it to apply.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 points 1 month ago

Yea, I guess because they are "selling" vs being compensated for? If the US govt dictates terms to that business under homeland security, GDPR probably wouldn't matter, but I can only assume since it's a sale, that's not the case.

[-] PartyAt15thAndSummit@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

Nice racket. First you pay the airlines for their tickets, then the ICE with your tax dollars to buy your data from said airlines.

[-] reiterationstation@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Soon they will be taking Americans to their death, too, and I assume no one will do fucking shit as usual.

[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Did Germans do shit about Hitler? Nope, it was the rest of the world. And, well, one German who did shit about Hitler.

[-] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Too bad he didn’t act sooner.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It’s just the TIP of the ICEberg.

[-] gradual@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago

Fuck.

Great point. We need to be able to see the interconnections of this more often.

[-] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Everyone is stealing your data and selling it. Feeding it into AI. Building profiles on you to better send you ads.

Yes. Literally every company. There's no regulation so to them it's free money.

[-] C1pher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Jesus... well, avoid flying trough US if possible.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

IBM supplied Nazis with the machines and punch cards to track the population. Throwing that out there for no particular reason. What where we talking about?

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

Do foreign airlines that come into the country do this? Would an EU plane be safe from this bullshit?

[-] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Since when does a government agency have to pay for receiving a companies data? I guess there is no law for allowing ICE to access that data, and then they just pay instead?

[-] FloMo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

If I had to guess, obtaining the data by force may require a court order or legal process.

Buying data that someone else is willingly selling bypasses those steps.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah that's one of the things that stood out as what the hell.. the companies already have the data, if ICE wanted it legally they shouldn't need to pay... Really shows how shady they're being.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] keegomatic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Since always, without a subpoena. Until PRISM, at least.

[-] nevm@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

At least for foreigners travelling into the US, you’re willingly giving the US govt most of this information up front anyway via the APIS. And paying for the privilege!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Someone trusts flying in these conditions? That's insane.

[-] sykaster@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

Even if I trust the flying itself, I don't trust not being detained upon entering the USA. I'm not flying there again anytime soon.

[-] dzso@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Even as a white male US born citizen, I also don't see myself flying back any time soon. I'm nobody, but I've run my mouth against fascists online enough that I've probably triggered some flag in the system.

[-] myrmidex@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Yea I feel the same, especially after reading this article.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Cue the airlines come with hand-wringing to beg the Feds for more bailouts because "nobody is flying anymore."

Parasitical business practices should lead to market exit.

[-] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Twelve billion

I thought we we're approximately 8.2 Billion on earth? Am i missing something?

[-] JoeDyrt@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

One person can have multiple flights per year. Its still a huge number considering the billions in Asia who never fly.

[-] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

You're right, everyone is only allowed one flight per year this doesn't add up

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Can we get the courts to determine that as an "unreasonable search" already?

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah so bad news. The government has routinely purchased data like this as an end run around the 4th Amendment. The data is collected by a third party, often with the customers "consent".

This is why we need stricter privacy controls around our data. The fact that this data was collated in the first place is problematic. The fact that it's being sold for profit is abhorrent.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

The mental trick that keeps on giving. When government does it - it's automatically bad, but when a private business does it - it's between the business and its customers. Then all the gov't needs to do is become a customer on the B2B side.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 month ago

As long as programs like 5-Eyes exist you just have to assume every time you interact with a company it is in the hands of all of the governments.

[-] gradual@lemmings.world 2 points 1 month ago

But useful idiots on lemmy keep telling me it's china doing all the surveillance through companies.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
19 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

71586 readers
2009 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS