189

I remember a time when visiting a website that opens a javacript dialog box asking for your name so the message "hi " could be displayed was baulked at.

Why does signal want a phone number to register? Is there a better alternative?

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Jami.net

Ignore the comment saying signal is "end to end encrypted" "private" etc They are simply stuck in a delusional state where they try to convince themselves that signal is the best option so they can continue using it. Nothing is private if it isn't fully libre because you never know what the proprietary code is doing. The signal protocol itself has its source code released, and the encryption and security code is publicly available, but the signal Foundation has stated that it uses both free code and proprietary code. Their reason is UI, but it's hard to make sure whatever proprietary code is being used for because you simply can't see it. As GNU puts it: "You're walking in a pitch black cave". Jami is fully libre and is a GNU project. You don't even need any phone number!

[-] MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

You can easily verify the keys of the person you’re speaking with, and they’re generated locally… so technically speaking, even if their servers are leaking, your messages are still unreadable, but yea that’s not ideal

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] solrize@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Jami, as much as I prefer it on various philosophical grounds, simply doesn't work very well at the moment. :(

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] solrize@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Is there a quick explanation of what signal actually does? I don't understand the need for a phone number either. Jami doesn't ask for a phone number. It has other deficiencies that make me not want to use it, but those are technical rather than policy, more or less. Similarly, irc (I'm luddite enough to still be using it) doesn't ask for a phone number either. So this is all suspicious. There are a bunch of other things like this too (Element, Matrix, etc.) that I haven't looked into and tbh I don't understand why they exist.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Signal is a messenger service. You can expire messages after a certain amount of time.

They ask for a phone number to limit bots. I used my Google voice number and it worked fine. I like Telegram which banned me after a day of use for using Google Voice.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] devfuuu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's not suspicious. It's been talked about for years. People know exactly what the phone number is used for. Easy discoverability, quick and seamless onboarding of new users by providing a way to bootstrap their social graph, and it being very similar to the process of the other biggest player that people just understand. And spam prevention. The phones are not leaked or used for anything else. The other alternatives exist and you are welcome to onboard the people you want onto them if you think it's simpler.

The code is open, if you don't trust other people and can't read the code to understand then hire someone you trust to validate the claims and assure you. But spreading FUD and saying it's suspicious is not productive to anyone.

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
  1. I don't understand what you mean about discoverability: is my presence on the network advertised to strangers and spammers? That doesn't sound good. What does the onboarding process look like?

  2. You still haven't said what Signal's advantages are supposed to be over alternatives, though I can guess some (e.g. better/more crypto than irc has). Jami seems conceptually ok, but buggy in implementation. Nextcloud Talk works but is kind of clunky. Matrix is popular though I've never used it: is it the main alternative to Signal these days? I thought it was what all the hipsters had migrated to while luddites like me were still on irc. Jitsi Meet looks nice though again I haven't explored it much. I've been puzzled for a long time that there is so much work in this area yet everything has deficiencies. Are there difficult problems to solve?

  3. If Signal's code is open then of course I'd want to self-host the server. Can I do that? Does that get in the way of the onboarding process you mention? Where does the phone number come in, in that case? If I to use Signal's server, that doesn't sound so open, and normally there's no way for me to verify that it's running the same code that they claim.

I don't see where I'm spreading FUD. Ignoring a question and calling it FUD doesn't invalidate the question.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They implemented an alt method IIRC but you must go out of your way to search and find it. I just recall seeing a bunch of post headlines about using email or something like that a year or so back.

They send an initial SMS message that is a main expense and funded by some rich person and donations. I think that has some significance to encryption or something but I'm not sure of the details. I could be wrong on that one, it has been years since I read the details.

load more comments (1 replies)

thousands of threads on this topic since decades ago.

it's an eternal debate (since signal has no plans to change)

just read the history and join the rest of us waiting for them to change. using signal before that change is completely optional. go ahead and don't use it. no problem.

opening the discussion again is just tiring.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] nucleative@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Is it possible to use a voip based SMS for registration?

Those are a little easier to get anonymously then physical sim cards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maverick604@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Session is an alternative that does not require, or request, your phone number (or any other identifying information). Honestly, I have no idea why Signal got popular and Sessions did not. As soon as Signal asked for my phone number that set off alarm bells for me and I’ve never really trusted it since.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] 0xtero@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago
[-] 0101100101@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

you will still need a phone number to sign up for Signal

[-] Geodad@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

I believe you can delete your phone number once you're up and running, but yeah that seems like an anti-feature.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 2 days ago

I see an option to change it, not delete. It's still attached to a SIM card which requires identity verification in many states.

[-] Geodad@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

You're right. That is odd.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
189 points (86.5% liked)

Privacy

37765 readers
1011 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS