1668
submitted 2 years ago by 5SpeedDeasil@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Metriximor@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Freya is a really good programming maths communicator so it doesn't surprise me

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 years ago

I think gamedev or I guess graphics programming, visualize maths pretty well. I literally quit high school because I could never make any progress in several areas, including math class. But once I read/watch more about gamedev, programming, graphics programming on my own, I got to understand many mathematical terminologies better than I have ever been taught in any school.

[-] Makeshift@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago

wow I wish we learned this kind of stuff in school

[-] lasagna@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

Invented in the 50s, Fortran = FORmula Translating language. It was basically created to solve this sort of problem.

[-] UserNotFound@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I don't know her, so maybe my question is stupid, but does she explain math without using code? I, honestly, am too stupid to programing, I don't understand it. I understand summary, not the second one

[-] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

She has a youtube channel

I've only watched a couple of her videos--on Splines and Bezier curves--and her explanations and animations were intuitive and beautiful to watch, but ultimately her target audience is game devs... So the answer to your question is "technically yes*"

*it's with the intent of learning to code the math

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] radix@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

The biggest difference (other than the existence of infinity) is that the upper limit is inclusive in summation notation and exclusive in for loops. Threw me for a loop (hah) for a while.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Duchess@yiffit.net 6 points 2 years ago

i still don't understand but thanks

[-] spacesweedkid27@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Ok now try infinite for loops

[-] fidodo@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Wouldn't reducer be more precise?

[-] Faresh@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

I think this is pretty much the imperative equivalent of foldl (\acc i -> acc + 3*i) 0 [1..4].

[-] basketsandhoes@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Can you explain this out a bit more? I'm a self-taught programmer, of sorts, and I'm not quite getting this...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SmoothSurfer@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

freya is not a random internet people

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
1668 points (96.5% liked)

Memes

49562 readers
2587 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS