35
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 weeks ago

Google uses AI to harvest data and direct web traffic to where it benefits them, more news at 11

[-] DeltaWingDragon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, looks like it scans everything in your browser. How Orwellian.

(Not sure, but probably)

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 2 weeks ago

Websites you visit can port scan your entire network bypassing most firewall rules and NAT. Your phone tracks your notifications and keystrokes and builds data models from both.

People love it though. Or they hate technology. Anything but hating corporations and the rich that gives them that sweet sweet dopamine

[-] L3s@hackingne.ws 5 points 2 weeks ago

Websites you visit can port scan your entire network bypassing most firewall rules and NAT

Wut?

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago
[-] L3s@hackingne.ws -1 points 2 weeks ago

Not sure if I'm missing something here, but that scans ports on the localhost, it is not a port scan of your entire network. While that's still crazy and not something you want, it's not quite what you initially said, and I don't believe they'd be able to scan outside of your machine

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine.

It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack.

There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well.

Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard.

In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range.

If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers.

From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on.

I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Scams like you not spending 99% of your time being bombarded with ads

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago

UBO just blocks most of those scams without the use of any "AI", but Google's Manifest v3 prevents UBO from running on Chrome...

this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
35 points (92.7% liked)

Technology

70499 readers
3827 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS