519
llms and stackoverflow (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 month ago by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

the post: https://mastodon.social/@mcc/114503153822531944

in reaction to: https://hachyderm.io/@shafik/114502582779559335

which reacted to: https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/1708801

which is from 2y ago apperantly

revised policy: https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/384396/ban-chatgpt-network-wide/385002#385002

idk if there is a more up to date one, it's crazy that their policies decisions are in the form of regulae posts it looks like

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 139 points 1 month ago

The "rewording ban" shows pretty clearly that it's not about the content, but that they don't want their precious dataset poisoned with LLM slop so they can better sell it to the slop generators.

[-] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 27 points 1 month ago

This is definitely the case, however it does have the side-effect of raising the quality of SO posts, so I'm for it

[-] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

Not trying to distract from how shitty it is, but in the EU I'm pretty sure that's illegal. They cannot stop you from deleting your own posts.

[-] SanguineBrah@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 1 month ago

Yes and no. The GDPR applies to personal data, which is to say data pertaining to a personally identifiable subject. Data can be anonymised in order to satisfy the right for deletion, making it no longer personal data, so they can delete your name but keep the content if they want. This is what Reddit does when you delete your account - the content remains but they replace your name with [deleted]. Things get a little more dicey if you reveal enough information in the content of your posts to still render you identifiable, in which case they would be obliged to remove that information so that you could no longer be identified.

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure it's covered by GPDR.

[-] anachrohack@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

I think people should not use websites where they cannot delete their own posts. I think it presents major security risks. Hackernews, for example, doesn't allow users to delete posts beyond a certain date. Allegedly, you can email them to request your data be deleted, but they've never replied to my emails.

[-] whereisk@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

“No give, only take“ - stack overflow’s license.

[-] AsyncTheYeen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Captalism 101

if it isn't the consequences of my favorite means of production?

[-] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wait, isn't the entire stackoverflow database public in the first place?

[-] sorter_plainview@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago

This looks outdated. As OP mentioned, there us no site-wide ban on LLM on SO.

[-] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

That is why I never contributed there, not because I couldn't, purely because I foresaw this moment.

[-] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 1 month ago

I have been waiting gleefully for SO to fall. I'll have strong words for their leadership when it happens.

this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
519 points (99.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

8115 readers
2344 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ReadyUser31@lemmy.world
aeronmelon@lemmy.world
needanke@feddit.org