Did India’s Chandrayaan-3 spacecraft really land near the moon’s south pole? : worldnews

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I did a bit more digging, and it seems like mostly only the American sources (NBC, VOA, CNBC, Forbes, Time, Fox, WSJ) mentioned India landing ON the South Pole, while other sources (The Guardian, BBC, Al Jazeera, China Daily, CBC) all corroborated what Modi actually said: that they got closer to the South Pole than anyone else and landed NEAR the South Pole.

Both Ouyang's statement and Modi's statement are true: India landed at 69 degrees South (not at the 90 degrees of the pole), but that's also further South than anyone else has achieved yet.

NPR and AP did both get it right, so I guess American journalism isn't completely down the gutter yet... But it's not a good look.

[-] Jack@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Maybe the ones who got it wrong is because they got their copy from Reuters who got it wrong:

https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/key-facts-about-indias-chandrayaan-3-moon-mission-2023-08-21/

https://www.reuters.com/science/view-reactions-indias-chandrayaan-3-makes-historic-moon-landing-2023-08-23/

https://www.reuters.com/world/india/india-counts-down-crucial-moon-landing-2023-08-23/

https://www.reuters.com/science/why-are-countries-racing-moons-heavily-cratered-south-pole-2023-08-23/

(tho these 2 have maps showing all the landing locations)

https://www.reuters.com/world/india/chandrayaan-3-punches-home-indias-lead-budget-space-flights-2023-08-24/

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

That wouldn't explain such a big gap between American media and everyone else, but it would explain why some journalists might have gotten it wrong. Either way, it's extremely lazy and negligent to just copy Reuters without looking for a primary source, especially when that primary source is literally a massive public figure.

[-] burningmatches@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Reuters is a news wire — ie, newspapers pay to “copy” its stories. It’s not lazy. It’s why Reuters exists.

[-] CordanWraith@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

That seems kinda inefficient though. Why do the newspapers exist and we don't just get our news from Reuters directly? I mean, other than the obvious competency issue, but as shown that applied to the newspapers too.

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure, I'll accept that, but it indicates a complete lack of editorial control and that journalists are being assigned articles they know absolutely nothing about.

Landing on the pole is extremely challenging and, from what I know of their space program, outside of India's current capabilities. That fact should have been caught far before publication, but of the US news sources I could find only AP and NPR caught it.

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

This statement indicates that CNSA is probably planning a mission closer to the South Pole than Chandarayaan. It's exciting times in the world of lunar exploration.

[-] DrunkenPirate@feddit.de -5 points 1 year ago

It’s a bit my car is bigger than yours.

Or better: my next car is going to be bigger than yours.

[+] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee -12 points 1 year ago

I still don’t understand why India feels morally justified doing this moon stuff when 90% of its citizens live in shit-strewn poverty.

Oh yeah. Sorry. I remember; Caste discrimination and religious-nationalist political fascism.

[-] heeplr@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago

you do know thar space exploration is a great investment and brings wealth to countries, right?

sillicon valley wouldn't exist like today without the apollo program.

[-] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, nah. Try basic stuff first.

World News

Rules: