197
Sure, since he's keen on continuing to flush the whole constitution down the toilet at this point, free speech seems like the next thing to go naturally. I can't wait to be branded an enemy of the state.
Yeah at this point you can kiss the Constitution goodbye.
Buy guns before you can't. We'll probably end up needing them the way things are headed.
If I've learned anything about the US justice system it's that it is pointless to prosecute rich people. They will just get convicted of and then still get off scot free for rape, treason, insurrection etc.
It's a simple fact now that the American justice system is a joke. As is the country in general.
It's the best system money can buy.
Imagine being such a fucking baby that Bruce Springsteen intimidates you.
Why does this read like a backhanded dig at Springsteen?
Bruce Springsteen is famously a nice guy. To be intimated by him would mean you would have to be wildly insecure.
And I'm thinking that a person would have to be an absolute dick for a nice guy like Springsteen to criticise said person.
Agreed.
It's like being intimidated by Mr. Rogers. You have to be the most insecure monster to feel like unconditional kindness is threatening to you.
trump doesn't like that people call Springsteen the Boss.
https://www.newsweek.com/snoop-dogg-trump-inauguration-2017523
whatever, crybaby.
the threat of a probe is Trump starting to extort money from those performers using the government to do so in my opinion.
Perhaps, just maybe, a toddler tantrum over a losing campaign paying production costs to performer's crews just like every campaign does, perhaps that's an attempt at deflection from the goddamn president of the United States accepting a luxury airplane from a foreign government which is explicitly forbidden by law.
If I’ve learned anything watching him, if he accuses someone else of something it’s only because he’s doing it and figures they must be. So how much did Kid Rock get?
The American government continues to allow it.
But yeah that is true.
The American people are the government. They’ve abdicated responsibility. The citizens are the ones allowing this to continue. They have LONG been aware they can’t count on their elected officials- and your comment does nothing but give them cover for their absolute cowardice.
So enlighten us. Specifically what do you propose that the citizens actually do?
Asked and answered, repeatedly, in almost every relevant discussion on this site (to say nothing of every history book you’ve ever read)- but hey, you already know this, and yet, have decided that getting defensive is the best response here.
As is always the case with Mango Mussolini and these sewer clowns, every accusation is a confession.
Shocker, he doesn't understand why you would pay people involved in production because he just ignores them
Major Investigation?
is he friends with General Specific and Private Public?
He has been known to grab privates.
Wtf. Complete gibberish. The idiot doesn't even understand the direction of a transaction.
How can ... Democrats paying some Bruce guy to play guitar... be an illegal campaign contribution. To the Democrats?
I have to wonder if he ever learned how a payment works. He grew up rich. Did he ever purchase anything from a store in which you get something and then pay for it by giving the store money?
Is he really on that level of stupidity?
This explains everything.
the key factor is whether the endorsement is part of a coordinated campaign effort or is simply a public communication. If it's a legitimate endorsement to the public, it's generally permissible. However, if it's part of a broader strategy to influence the election AND is coordinated with the candidate, it could be subject to campaign finance regulations.
Campaign laws in the US are strange at times.
I’m not saying laws were broke, personally I doubt they were, just giving info.
Yeah that'll be a nice waste of time for the lawyers who think they'll be paid for doing a massive investigation.
God king makes up the rules. He's attempting to set it up so that whatever he writes in an executive order is immutable.
We can look at this now and go God this is stupid, But be careful we're not very far off it being actionable. He would absolutely love to imprison the competition and anyone that helped them.
He's just pissed because Springsteen said mean words about him. So now, like the big crybaby he is, he's going to shout and whine about how it isn't fair and make all kinds of threats to get even.
No one's going to stop him.
Boy, that Bruce Springsteen guy really got under his thinned skin...all layers of it.
this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
197 points (97.6% liked)
News
36344 readers
755 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS