242
submitted 11 months ago by vga@sopuli.xyz to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] subterfuge@lemmy.world 145 points 11 months ago

Alleged Ghost Gun” FTFY

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 66 points 11 months ago

I don't even know if they are alleging it anymore. The chain of custody is entirely fucked, and the fact that it even leaked is going to make it hard to include at trial.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 10 points 11 months ago

Wonder how long that cop had it laying around?

[-] astrsk@fedia.io 78 points 11 months ago

You mean the gun planted in his backpack?

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hypothetically:

If he did it. And if he stashed the gun. And then the cops planted a gun. Could he recount the events on the stand and reveal he stashed the gun, thus proving the cops are attempting to frame him?

This is nonsense. But, hypothetically…

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Bad move. Your right to remain silent doesn't mean you get to pick and choose which questions you answer on the stand should you choose to testify. Instead he could give plenty of information to his lawyer who could then rabidly attack the planted gun and prove malfeasance.

[-] AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

if your lawyer tells you to stfu, you stfu. the lawyer is better at lawyering than you 👍

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tire@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

The court is capable of calling out more than one person. It could send him to prison for the original crime and also charge the police with a separate crime of trying to frame him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Oh hey, yet another article perpetuating the narrative that Luigi is guilty. Must be a day of the week that ends in 'y'.

[-] tio_bira@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

If it's so legal, why we don't have the stl for it ?

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 9 points 11 months ago

We do. There are Glock frame stls everywhere. I didn't look into this as I've fallen out of the print shoot repeat community cause of arthritis keeping me from enjoying it. But there are no less than a hundred files luigi could have gotten from a certain "odd to see" website.

[-] ssroxnak@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Making your own firearms has always been legal in America. And it's not exactly easy. Even 3D printed guns take a lot of work.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Strictly speaking, if you want a reliable firearm you are much better off getting one made out of steel than composite plastics.

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Most 3D printed guns use commercially available parts for the pressure bearing components.

A 3D printed Glock uses a slide and barrel bought from Glock. The only 3D printed part is the frame, which is the only part that has to be serialized.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I did a p80 build and would consider it more reliable than anything made in layers, and it is still collecting non existent dust in a safe cause of its issues. But Glocks are considered the gold standard of reliability and they are plastic lowers.

[-] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I wonder why they don't work so well. Maybe I don't understand how they operate but it seems like if the frame is in the correct precise shape it should work like a regular Glock.

Probably better for everyone that they don't work like the real thing.

In The Philippines there is a thriving underground industry making illegal pistols from scratch. Last I heard the 1911 was the favorite, here's a newer video from 2023

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ok43dZAVdQM

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

Objects are more than their shape

If you made a Glock out of frozen custard, would you expect it to perform the same as the real deal?

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

So it's a lack of integrity of the 3D printed plastic? What's a Glock made of, nylon?

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

I'm assuming you partially know the answer to that given nylon is a random thing to pull out if you didn't

But it's a specifically engineered polymer of nylon..... And steel.

[-] Bahnd@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

The problem with building rigid objects with 3d printers is that their weakest point is usually along the layer lines. So even if pieces of real firearms are made of nylon or ABS, they would be injection molded or use a process that forms more durable shapes.

[-] zueski@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

Post processing can address most of that. Pack it in casting sand and heat it up again and let it cool.

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago

I guess it's nylon because that's one of the hardest plastics we have. Many of my tools have "plastic" parts that are nylon.

[-] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Velma pulls off the mask and it's an I-beam yelling about pesky kids

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RandomStickman@fedia.io 21 points 11 months ago

It's the suppressor. Since most semi-auto pistols relies on the recoil from firing to cycle, adding a suppressor can mess up the cycling without a Nielsen device.

There are plenty of examples of unsuppressed pistols with 3d printed frames working just fine on yt

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Seconded, this is the best explanation here. The browning action, on which most semi automatic pistol operate on, does not function well when a suppressor is added w/ out a Nielson device or 'booster'.

The design is made assuming the barrel weighs ____ oz, if suddenly it weighs more then the reliability is impaired.

[-] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

Of fucking course Hiram Maxim invented that shit.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

3d printed material has a lower tensile strength than injection molded or stamped materials. Most prints are weakest between the layers, and it's not always immediately obvious where the weakened points are. Even the parts that don't get hot or explode are moving and rubbing against other parts.

Gun parts are subjected to rigorous testing and grading. Not only do they know roughly how many uses before a part will break, but also what to look for on a worn or breaking part.

3d printed guns, you never know which bullet will be the last.

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

if the frame is in the correct precise shape

3D printing isn’t meant for production-level accuracy. It’s a prototyping technology that is good enough for a lot of different applications, but not when sub-millimeter precision is necessary.

Can you make something that works? Of course! Will it work as reliably as something made using better processes? Usually not.

[-] moody@lemmings.world 6 points 11 months ago

You can definitely reliably get sub-millimeter precision with a consumer-grade 3d printer. Even with a 0.4mm nozzle, once dialed-in, you can make print-in-place models with a clearance of 0.1mm, and the default layer thickness is typically 0.2mm.

While layer adhesion is usually the weakness of 3d-printed parts, some materials like PETG or TPU have very good adhesion, to the point that printing on a glass plate can damage the glass when removing the model.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Can you make something that works? Of course! Will it work as reliably as something made using better processes? Usually not.

Are you mad?!? My wife might read this!!

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I give you my permission to “attack the source” on my comment since attacking the fact won’t get you far.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Hand machining precision parts to construct working firearms that are so identical to the originals that official parts or attachments would be interchangable... This is like a dream job for me. If I could stand living in the tropics, maybe I'd move to the Philippines...

Speaking of the tropics, in that video the workshop is exposed to the humid tropical air. I wonder how they deal with rust on their tools and swelling in the wooden tool handles.

At any rate, I say keep it up. Keep doing fine artisan work while simultaneously sticking to the man and earning a living. Very impressive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago

Excellent work, 47!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
242 points (95.8% liked)

News

37165 readers
834 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS