573
Stallman (i.imgur.com)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PillowTalk420@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago

I'm something of a proprietary blob myself.

[-] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago
[-] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

You can get my source code but good luck compiling it.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

9 month compile time?? We've gotta get these numbers down

[-] A7thStone@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Just multithread. If you get nine people pregnant you can have a baby in one month, right?

[-] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 6 points 1 year ago

Ayy, not that fast, their blob is licensed under the BSL, get to know them a while first

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 77 points 1 year ago
[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 120 points 1 year ago
[-] troed@fedia.io 42 points 1 year ago

oh wow that really put the trust back into Ventoy. Nice! Thanks for the link

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 16 points 1 year ago

Happened after a partner product in the Ventoy repo was found to have a pretty major vulnerability due to a... you guessed it, pre-compiled supply chain attack.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 year ago

There is also a new community fork to get rid of the blobs and bad cert loading. The ventroy dev has made a bunch of concerning choices so some people hard forked the code. I forgot where is was though.

[-] pogmommy@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

That's the one

[-] Tundra@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

just started using this for the first time, Is it still ok to use?

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, but people have concerns. Ventoy is fully open-source, but the build process pulls binary blobs (compiled executables, think of them like blob chips) from other F/OSS projects, which is an issue for some people. They have legitimate concerns about trusting Ventoy because they have to implicitly trust the projects that Ventoy pulls from but can't verify what is getting pulled. If such a project were to become compromised (the way XZ-Utils was), it would eventually spread to Ventoy.

That being said, the developers (or singular developer, not sure) are taking steps to reduce Ventoy's dependency on external blobs. It's a difficult task and they have limited resources, but they have acknowledged that it is an issue and are working on a solution.

[-] unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If such a project were to become compromised (the way XZ-Utils was), it would eventually spread to Ventoy.

What a lot of people don't know is that the XZ attack entirely relied on binary blobs: Partially in the repo as binary test files, and partially in only the github release (binary).

If someone actually built it from source, they weren't vulnerable. So contrary to some, it wasn't a vulnerability that was in plain view that somehow passed volunteer review.

This is why allowing binary data in open-source repos should be heavily frowned upon.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

I don't believe iVentroy (PXE tool) is fully foss but I could be wrong.

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Yea it's fine.

From memory the blob everyone was complaining about was related to eufi and came from Fedora.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

Except for the part where it completely nullifies secure boot...

Fine if you don't care about that but it caused a lot of security issues in the enterprise

[-] Lucien@mander.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

Off topic, but I'd never heard of Ventoy before and looking at it now, holy shit, I wish I'd known about it sooner.

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

Just open source blobs instead of proprietary blobs

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 year ago

And here I am, marking unfree software as installable as the first thing I do on any distro.

[-] BlaBlaBla@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 year ago

It's good that it's opt in

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

Oh, agreed. There are definitely people who can live without unfree software. Me, I can't do without Steam and Lutris.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The NixOS default config has allowUnfree set to false, so it's not always opt-in

[-] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That sounds changeable and off by default. So how come you wouldn't say that is opt-in?

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Unfree apps are not allowed by default. You have to opt in to allow them.

[-] i_am_hiding@aussie.zone 9 points 1 year ago

I'll absolutely take FLOSS if I can get it, but failing that, FOSS is still a nice improvement over closed-source software.

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Libre, which is synonymous with free.

I think it's more free in some way? I'm not sure, but I think it means free as in doesn't cost anything. Whereas FOSS means free as in open and modifiable, but the maintainer(s) might still charge for it.

[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 5 points 1 year ago

Its French for "free", as in freedom. Free is ambiguous and can also mean free of charge.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I think those are backwards

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

I thought they might be... you're probably right.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dinckelman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I love OSS but I won’t sacrifice my experience just to go fully libre. Sometimes it just doesn’t make sense. I’m glad it’s an option for people who do want that though

[-] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, telegram

[-] baggins@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unzips my ghidra 😏

[-] rickdg@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago
[-] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 year ago
[-] muhyb@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago
[-] neox_@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

I can only recommend Guix system 👍

[-] merci3@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

something something snap package

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

Not a proprietary blob unless you install proprietary software

[-] merci3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I'm mentioning the "proprietary backend" drama around snaps. Not that I care too much, anyway. I use lots of proprietary software daily

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It isn't a "proprietary back end" it is what Stallman calls Service as a Software Substitute. (SaaSS) It wouldn't matter if they claimed it was completely foss. You are still using a foreign service you don't control.

With a package manager that is sort of unavoidable though. In the case of snaps you could always modify the source to have a different repo. The real reason not to use snaps is all the other issues.

[-] merci3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Fair point. Just to be clear: I am NOT a developer, so I may be very wrong on that take.

But from what I understand, the difference from what snaps does to what traditional packages does is that the Canonical repos are hard coded in it, thus making it harder to decentralise, and that's not very in line with what many wish for a FOSS ecosystem.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago

Linux moment

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[-] andybytes@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

If the working conditions don't change computers will become a ball and chain Then deemed useless.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
573 points (98.8% liked)

linuxmemes

31635 readers
64 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. 🇬🇧 Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. 🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇸
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 3 years ago
    MODERATORS