35
Sneaking is so broken
(lemmy.world)
The game is as hard as you want to make it. If you think it's broken, don't use it. Simple as. There's enough food to long rest after every encounter. Do you do that?
Isn't there a long rest clock, per se? Aren't certain events dependent upon or locked behind various thresholds that way?
Sure seems like some of them should be, but from as far as I can tell from my own game and from YouTube, no.
Dammit, I've been restricting their use worse than ol' Link with health potions. 🤦🏼♂️
It's one of my biggest criticism. The premise push you toward minimizing the rest, and so does the gameplay (because it would be silly to just heal for free al the time, right?).
Turns out, I slept too little and I have so little development that required me to sleep to have them happen :(
There are points where if you long rest it will fail the encounter, but they are rare.
Verisimilitude. First time it happens it took me out of flow. Now I notice when NPCs use it against me.
To answer your question, no I don't rest after every fight. That's missing the point. Maybe I didn't do a good job explaining in the post. I like nuking people. Was curious if others came across this mechanic and how they use it.
If this was criticism of the difficulty I'd say ideally every character would get locked in turn based when combat started. Stealth could also use a pass to make it a little more internally logical. I shouldn't be able to walk undetected in plate, in half light, at 45 degrees to someone's eyeballs. But I'm not criticizing.
Should noise and peripheral vision be things? Yes. Are they well defined in 5e? No. Is the game capable of being a great stealth game with the engine? Also no.
The biggest issue is the preciseness of the field of vision. It could probably be wider once combat has begun, but also there could be a gray area around the red where you don't know if they can see you.
You could use:
- Passive investigation to have a better idea where they might be able to see you.
- Passive survival to know where it's dangerous.
- Active stealth to actually move it.
- Active stealth every time you move your base movement within earshot.
Modding community will come up with some fun stuff. I'm pretty excited to see where that goes in the next few years.
It’s not really broken. Your party members are completely separate and distinct characters that can do whatever they want from a role playing perspective, including splitting up - arbitrarily adding everyone into initiative even if the enemies can’t see the other PC’s would feel less realistic and more videogamey. I’m saying this as someone who plays tabletop dnd and values the flexibility and near limitless options the game can accommodate. This is also a weird situation cuz many tabletop players have very different homebrew rules about how combat is initiated. Some DM’s allow people to opt into combat when someone else initiates, some DM’s decide who is in an encounter by distance, some force everyone into initiative when one party member initiates - there’s a lot of permutations and I think Larian did the right thing here cuz if you don’t like it and think it’s broken you can very easily not use stealth and line of sight to nuke your enemies. This isn’t a competitive game after all. I for one appreciate the tabletop spirit carrying over to BG3 instead of being unnecessarily restrictive.
What's broken for me after using Astarion for assasinations in the same place is the "enemy of justice" condition. They can smell him through every shapeshift, I changed the entire party to gnomes after the deed and still couldn't walk away from my crimes.
Yeah, I've always thought that mechanic was so broken. When one person initiates combat, the entire party really should just go into initiative. It's weird having certain party members be out of turn-based mode, like they were in a separate time stream or something.
Also I still don't understand the mechanics when you go into initiative from that state. Sometimes, you have an action, sometimes you don't and just have to pass your turn.
So here's my best understanding of the mechanics of the first turn of combat:
If you use an action to attack someone and it starts combat, everyone rolls initiative and takes turns in order. When your turn comes around, you'll be missing that action--basically, you to use your action before everyone else got a turn, but that counts as your action for the round.
If you engage turn-based mode out of combat and your actions initiate combat, it works the same way. I this case, you might also have used some movement and/or your bonus action.
There are some abilities that grant all your actions, bonus actions, and movement back when you roll initiative (the Assassin gets this, I believe). So if you spec'd Astarion as an assassin, he'll "break" the above rule and have all his resources available, even if he did a massive sneak attack to start combat.
Even in real time, if you do something like jump, you'll notice your bonus action icon goes gray for a few seconds. If combat starts in that window, you'll have already used that bonus action for that round.
Hope that helps clarify!
That makes a TON of sense actually. Thanks for the explanation!
When a non-tracked character enters the battle they roll initiative and get slotted in. So Astarion usually end up at the start. Then my paladin gets out at the back after the alpha strike. That part makes sense to me.
Otherwise, agreed turn based mode should be everywhere. Not just localized to the battle or a little tu n based bubble.
Like, I started my assault on the goblin camp with a fireball and then everyone outside of range piled on. The whole camp should've been locked in.
Yeah that makes sense to me too. I was more referring to the fact that when some of my characters join into combat late, a lot of times they're missing an action even though its their turn. I always just have to pass in those situations.
The whole camp should’ve been locked in.
Agreed. In the Goblin Camp, I've even had situations where I would trigger one group, but I can clearly see goblins in another room just walking around casually. Breaks immersion a bit.
The worst part is when only one character goes in and you don't realize the rest of your party is still free and all the enemies just gank on that one character relentlessly.
they’re missing an action even though its their turn.
That is weird. Haven't noticed that so it went right over my head. Will watch for it.
I actually cheesed it the other way--my tired and battered party was trying to exit the goblin camp without fighting the main force in the courtyard (at this point, I didn't know I could fast travel when not near a portal, and wanted to play it out for RP reasons anyway).
So I sent my thief out first, and he disengage/sprinted through the entire camp, drawing all the attention. Once everyone was drawn away, I let combat sit there "paused" while the other three party members waltzed out the front door and off to safety. Then my thief outran everyone.
Personally, I wish Larian would have given the option to lock the entire map into turn-based mode when combat begins anywhere, but I know it's not everyone's cup of tea (especially with multi-player). Just my preference.
And here I always thought combat was proximity based, not just sight based. Is it really the case that party members remain out of combat until they are seen or choose to engage?
Setting the combat tracker to be based on proximity to engaged friends/foes seems like the simplest solution.
Anyone far enough from combat doesn't get pulled in. Anyone in hiding as long as they aren't in sight lines won't get pulled into combat. If they are in sight they have to pass a stealth check to remain hidden. Anytime they move they'll have to pass a check as well to remain hidden. You can abuse this during the Cazador fight to keep Astarion from being sacrificed. Leave him at the door and start the fight with Cazador then bring Astarion down to the fight. Cazador won't sacrifice Astarion.
Works even better with invisibility. You can waltz right through the middle of an ongoing battle and assassinate that hard to reach mage in the back.
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
35 points (92.7% liked)
Baldur's Gate 3
6284 readers
5 users here now
All things BG3!
Baldur’s Gate 3 is a story-rich, party-based RPG set in the universe of Dungeons & Dragons, where your choices shape a tale of fellowship and betrayal, survival and sacrifice, and the lure of absolute power. (Website)
Spoilers
If your post contains any possible spoilers, please:
- Use the text [SPOILER] at the beginning of your title, do not include any spoilers in the title.
- Use the appropriate spoiler markup to conceal that content in the body of your post.
Thank you!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS