961
Feathers? (sub.wetshaving.social)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Tagger@lemmy.world 89 points 2 months ago

Isn't this a while thing? Where archeologists have drawn alternative interpretations of what dinosaurs could have looked like. I think there was a famous example, where red they got people to.draw a dinosaur from a hippo skeleton and the creature was really scary looking?

[-] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 2 months ago

Hippos are also deceptively docile looking creatures

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 48 points 2 months ago

If anything on this Earth should look like a Jurassic Park dinosaur it's hippos

[-] Uruanna@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Wouldn't that mean T-Rex actually looked cuddly and friend shaped?

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 34 points 2 months ago
[-] UnculturedSwine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

Damn! I was hoping they were friend-shaped this whole time. The babies look kinda cute at least.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Fabian@lemmy.zip 47 points 2 months ago

To be fair, hippos are one of the most dangerous animals for humans

[-] then_three_more@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

Gotta be about third after humans and mosquitoes.

[-] HowAbt2morrow@futurology.today 8 points 2 months ago

Chihuahuas are scary af. They could easily be on second or third.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Scary, but not a serious threat.

You can kick a Chihuahua pretty far, a hippo suffers from no such vulnerability.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Depends on the amount.

I'd rather fight against 1 hippo than the equivalent body weight in chihuahuas.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

A hippo would definitely be preferable. A fast and brutal death is preferable to getting your ankles bit out from under you by a thousand Chihuahua.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] xylol@leminal.space 8 points 2 months ago

The thing about chihuahuas is they get other dogs to do their dirty work

Caramena said a pack of three dogs dug under two six-inch chainlink fences to reach the communal animal enclosure on the night of Jan. 19. Happy Hollow staff members found the slaughtered equines covered in bite marks the following morning.

The third canine, a chihuahua, has not been caught but is "not considered a threat.

https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/happy-hollow-san-jose-horses-donkey-dog-maul-dead-12537735.php

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 2 months ago

All Yesterdays is exactly this. The first half reimagines dinos from how we traditionally view them (leaning into things like feathers and a t-rex sleeping) and the second half reinterprets contemporary fauna based on their skeletons to demonstrate how wrong we might be about dinos. It's a great coffee table book.

[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Obligatory All Tomorrows mention, one of the most existentially terrifying works of speculative scifi I've ever read, drawn by the same paleo artist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago
[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 76 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[-] Opisek@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

I approve of friend-shaped T-Rex.

[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

such a fluffy boi

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago

If friend shaped, why devouring me whole?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think even scientists from the 80's and 90's were able to tell where some connective tissue would have been. So while they got the skin wrong, the overall shape wouldn't be TOO far off. Also, Jurassic Park is what Hollywood thought dinosaurs looked like, not necessarily palentologists.

To me, this article feels more like "We have an extremely limited idea of the amount of knowledge scientists have. Here's what a bunch of animals would look like if they were drawn by an idiot like we believe palentologists to be." Like, some of those are clearly trying to deliberately get it wrong, like the house cat.

Then again, it is BuzzFeed. It's not like they base their "journalism" on anything except feels.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vivendi@programming.dev 55 points 2 months ago

There are markers on the bones based on fat weight. This wasn't known originally when creating the "Jurassic Park Bullshit" dinosaurs though.

[-] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 31 points 2 months ago

Wait, people say "Jurassic Park Bullshit" dinosaurs?!

Even if they're inaccurate, they're my homies.

Also I'm referring to the 1990s Jurassic Park. I haven't kept up with modern versions.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 26 points 2 months ago

Having kept up with the new ones myself, I can only recommend you don't.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

God they're bad.

But I loved the super-military dino they had trained that would attack someone if you pointed a rifles laser at them.

Like - you're already pointing a gun at them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sunbutt23@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

We know what you mean, new ones are Jurassic WORLD.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Are there new illustrations out there based on this? I wanna see the chub dinos!

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

they can base muscle attachement based on the bone marks, and scars, they can extrapolate weight from there.

[-] d00ery@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Interesting thought, but don't penguins have feathers for insulation from cold weather so without the feathers they probably look less chunky.

[-] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 26 points 2 months ago

Isn't it primarily fat rather than feathers?

[-] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 months ago

They probably have some fat as well, but penguins are mostly insulated by their special feathers, which are adapted to prevent the cold water from actually reaching the skin.

[-] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 months ago

Nah, you can look at pics of penguins that lost their feathers. Their body shape is from the fat.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Penguins without their feathers are still pretty chonk, and decidedly penguin-shaped.

Their feathers (adult feathers, anyhow) are actually rather short but their coverage is extremely dense. The feathers make them waterproof, not insulated. Their thick skin and layer of fat is what makes them coldproof.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 16 points 2 months ago

SPACE LLAMAAA

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

That skeleton is surprising - I just thought they had very slopey shoulders.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Checking out some walrus skeletons... yeah, I don't see why not.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Kind of hard to maintain that bulk on leaves and grass, bud. I guess it would help them with predators, though.

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 42 points 2 months ago

Hippos and rhinos get pretty big on that diet! If anything plants are a better diet for something really chunky because plants cannot run away

[-] django@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 2 months ago
[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

As well as silverbacks, and giant pandas

[-] TheRealKuni@midwest.social 10 points 2 months ago

People use the term “strong as an ox.” Oxen don’t eat meat.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

plants cannot run away

Sure, you just need a lot of it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 23 points 2 months ago

True, that's why elephants hunt lions for protein.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 months ago

They have a good idea how much the big sauropods might have weighed based on fossilized foot prints and bone structure. Still, if something is not preserved in the fossil record it will not be shown in reconstructions.

[-] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

What if it was reaaaaally fluffy down?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
961 points (99.7% liked)

memes

16721 readers
1136 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS