266
submitted 1 month ago by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 month ago

I wish her the best of luck.

I still expect Harris 2028 because “it’s her turn”

But hey, maybe there’s hope on the horizon

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

Dem leadership is positioning themselves behind Gavin Newsom. They should be backing AOC but she's too "woke" in their eyes.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Exactly. The leadership has already picked Newsom, you can tell because he is already moving to the center.

Harris lacks a key, critical asset to win the Presidency in today's America: a penis. Newsom already has one, so is any a clear advantage.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 20 points 1 month ago

Harris's issue was she kept telling people who can't afford their rent and groceries that the economy is better than ever. She ran a dog shit centrist campaign that did nothing to motivate voters. Harris represented the status quo, same with Newsom. Both will get absolutely shredded in 2028 if they run.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Courting a fucking Cheny didn't help matters

[-] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Let's totally ignore that Hillary got the popular vote the first time and if the US didn't have the E.C. than history would've been quite different.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

None of this is relevant. Neither party wants to change the voting system so only winning the popular vote is matters

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

According to the two books written about Biden's mental decline, one of the main defenses people close to the president used was, "If he drops out, you get Harris, and then we'll lose for sure." I'm sure they'll pick some low talent party loyalist who has been waiting patiently, but it seems even the party leadership never wanted it to be her turn.

[-] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

There’s no way they’ll run Harris again, if they do the backlash will cause them to change course.

AOC most likely, with the slim chance someone better steps up before then.

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago

No chance of AOC because she’s vilified by the right and it’s important to appeal to voters who won’t vote for you.

[-] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

They don’t have anything though and she can handle herself. Calling someone a bartender can only get you so far and all it does is humanise her anyway.

Her views are significantly more popular, even amongst people who don’t (usually) vote and the right (when they don’t know it’s a liberal proposing it).

[-] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

The right vilifies every prominent Democrat.

[-] Blum0108@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The real reason is that she will scare the corporate overlords

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago

I think Democrats subservience to wealthy donors is even more our downfall.

[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Every wealthy donor who doesn't want the government packed full of fascists should be pushing their representatives for significant and meaningful campaign finance reform.

It's too bad that they'd be giving up some of their influence, but at this point, everyone should be able to see that it's becoming a matter of physical safety.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

They don't care if fascists are in office. Maybe they will be bummed that their queer assistant gets gulaged, but at the end of the day all the donor class cares about are quarterly income reports.

[-] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 month ago

There’s the targeted message of the month!

[-] fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

ANYONE who says that this is “ageist” should be forced to give up ALL their technology and advancements from the last 150 years and given the consequences for it. Any complaints? We will call you ageist and punish you. Seriously, ANYONE who makes this argument when it comes to politicians is less than useless. They should be mocked and laughed at

[-] triptrapper@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Can you explain what you mean by this?

[-] hapablap@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 month ago

The older I get the more I favor unions because they seem to support the idea of seniority. However, assigning benefits based on seniority doesn't seem like a very effective solution for a well functioning system. Gotta hand it to the Republicans. They ran with a crazy ass fucking disrupter and it's worked for them. Wish the democrats had the balls to roll with Bernie 9 years ago.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Anyone here running for anything?

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I've been on a school board, PTSOs, volunteer regularly, coached traveling soccer (it doesn't pay anything) for over a decade. I didn't have enough time to run for any office but i go to every other town board meeting and i show up to school board meetings semi regularly.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago

I'm a "child of the internet" and would more than likely be the cause of the left and right uniting in their disgust of me for some dumb thing I did/said like 20 years ago lol

[-] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Too scatterbrained to be a good public speaker. Helped launch a disability rights org and lobbied government instead (with reports and scathing tweets instead of money). Organised grassroots pressure is surprisingly effective, would recommend.

[-] SnarkoPolo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

If you guys really want this revolution you keep talking about, forget the presidency...for now. Social change begins at the bottom. The country has turned too damn far right to make any progress nationally. Focus on city council, planning commissions, especially school and library boards. Change will flow upward storm there.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
266 points (98.9% liked)

politics

24800 readers
1526 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS