423
submitted 1 year ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kitonthenet@kbin.social 121 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

good tbh, their metro kicks too much ass to have everyone driving around, their system has it's problems but not driving isn't one of them

[-] HidingCat@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

Honestly, as much as I wanted a car as a 20-something, I do think this is for the better. There needs to be some adjustments as a lot of the buyers are commercial entities trying to corner a somewhat unsustainable ridehailing market, but overall I'm happy with the tradeoff, especially with the improvement in public transport in recent years.

[-] kitonthenet@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

improvement in public transport in recent years

I've only visited once and that was several years ago, I'm surprised to hear the public transit has actually gotten better. I'm from Chicago, which is one of the few US cities with a functional metro, and it's blown out of the water by the mrt just on comfort alone

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Chicago Transit is awesome if you're traveling toward/from downtown but god does it suck if you're traveling across the north or west side. Chicago needs a east and south train from the metro station in Jefferson Park or something

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HidingCat@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

There was a period in the 2000s when the metro was under maintained and profits were maximised (fuck you Saw Phiak Hwa), where there were times even at 10pm I couldn't get on the train because they were so packed, thanks to horrible intervals between each train. Said undermaintence lead to some pretty bad breakdowns (for Singapore anyway) around the mid-2010s . Ever since then they've increased maintenence, decreased interval times during both peak and off-peak periods, and more lines were also added, though some of them were already being planned in mid-2000s.

The bus system has also improved when they moved to a hybrid model, where government tenders for operators to operate the bus routes, so there's private and public aspects into it.

While not perfect, it's definitely better than the mid-to-late 2000s, and I'm really grateful we have it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] st0v@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 year ago

what a lot of people can't understand is that a car I'm singapore is a ball and chain. it's not freedom by any stretch of the imagine there.

it's a status symbol or a job requirement.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 75 points 1 year ago

With a fully functional, affordable, universal public transport system, owning a car is a luxury, not a need.

[-] moitoi@feddit.de 29 points 1 year ago

It never was a need. This is a myth build by the car manufacturers. They lobbied for the car centered model with oil companies. This never was the model.

The same applies for suburbs full of houses.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago

It takes 14 hours to walk across the whole country at its widest point.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago

Of course it's based on money and not need based or a lottery system or anything like that because fuck the non-rich, amirite? I mean, if you don't have a net worth in the seven figures are you even a person?

[-] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 89 points 1 year ago

You don't need a car in Singapore. Public transit is quite good and it isn't that big of a city

[-] Alteon@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

I'm not disagreeing with you. But the only people that get the right to travel in a car are the rich. Rather than it be based on a needs-based system or lottery system. The rich get the right, but normal people don't. That's the point he's trying to make.

[-] mayonaise_met@feddit.nl 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it's a clever way to get rich people to pay high taxes. Singapore is just not a place suited for private cars for the able bodied. The same policy in other countries wouldn't be fair, but I could probably see it work in Manhattan or in the canal district in Old Amsterdam.

[-] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

The catch is you don't need a car in Singapore. It's less than half the size of London with an incredible public transit system.

The need isn't really there and the costs of maintaining one is very high. You aren't going to have many if any poor people who could afford a car to begin with.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago
[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

If you read the article, it says that price is for any car over 1.6 litre

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 10 points 1 year ago

MFW a honda fit cost as much as a tesla

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

I think the car itself is on top of this, but even the car is more expensive because they're harder to get

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
423 points (98.0% liked)

World News

39034 readers
1325 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS