12
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Pro@programming.dev to c/linux@lemmy.world

Archive.

You've heard the "prophecy": next year is going to be the year of the Linux desktop, right? Linux is no longer the niche hobby of bearded sysadmins and free software evangelists that it was a decade ago! Modern distributions like Ubuntu, Pop!_OS, and Linux Mint are sleek, accessible, and โ€” dare I say it โ€” mainstream-adjacent.

Linux is ready for professional work, including video editing, and it even manages to maintain a slight market share advantage over macOS among gamers, according to the Steam Hardware & Software Survey.

However, it's not ready to dethrone Windows. At least, not yet!

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago

Every year is the year of the Linux desktop.

We aren't claiming it when we say it. We are celebrating.

[-] Matth78@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

IMHO as long as linux don't have a full UI for main settings it will be difficult for it to impose himself.
I know a lot of people will say that now you don't need the terminal but actually you do!
I am using Fedora with KDE and for instance it offers no GUI to easily create and manage user groups. You want to look at your service, stop them, start them, schedule a task... It's all with terminal ! And I am sure there is plenty of other examples.

Don't take me wrong, I am still a Linux user! But I would appreciate not having to look/check online to change some basic things once in a while! ๐Ÿ˜‰

[-] duckiegobrrr@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago

I mean, to be fair, user groups and services really aren't a thing that a "normie" would be messing with on any platform under most circumstances, and if they would be then there'd be some understanding that it'd involve some sort of "hackerman tooling" as one might call it, whether it's Windows's service manager or the magic black window with a blinking cursor in it.

I, for one, had no idea what svchost.exe on Windows did (thought it was just M$ bloat, really) until after I started using Linux and had already made several systemd units on there and realized that Windows kinda-sorta-but-also-not-really-sometimes has that as well.

A bigger problem imo is how Linux always seems to have a point-and-click way to do most of everything that your "average computer user" needs to do... but then somebody (cough Canonical and their snapd stuff cough) fucks it up and makes it so that you can't just say "you can install everything using the app store", which results in encounters like this one.

Oh, and your "why is this even an issue anymore" things like (shameless plug) this. Seriously.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

An effective terminal is a feature, not a bug. Every Linux problem has the same solution: search the web, ctrl-c, ctrl-v.

No navigating through "settings" and "preferences" and "tools" menus to figure out where this particular developer decided to hide that particular setting. Just copy and paste, problem solved.

[-] 3abas@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago

That's a bad take. Learning the bad habit of copy/pasting command and depending on the Internet to do the most basic changes to your computer is not a "feature" of the terminal. I can Google how to navigate Windows control center too.

Setting search is a solved problem, you simply search for the setting name in the UI, it's way easier than navigating terminal flags and switches.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

Setting search is a solved problem, you simply search for the setting name in the UI,

This assumes the developer bothered to make that setting available through the UI.

With the terminal, that isn't a problem: You're using the same UI as the developer.

[-] 3abas@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago

That assumes the programmer bothered to make user friendly flags... The terminal doesn't magically just work.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

With open source, the delineation between "user" and "programmer" is arbitrary and capricious. The GUI-centric Windows approach reinforces that artificial distinction; the terminal breaches that barrier.

[-] highball@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

it offers no GUI to easily create and manage user groups

Correct, a very common task for little grandmas and other average users.

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

11306 readers
109 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS