173
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by avidamoeba@lemmy.ca to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

Corporate VPN startup Tailscale secures $230 million CAD Series C on back of “surprising” growth

Pennarun confirmed the company had been approached by potential acquirers, but told BetaKit that the company intends to grow as a private company and work towards an initial public offering (IPO).

“Tailscale intends to remain independent and we are on a likely IPO track, although any IPO is several years out,” Pennarun said. “Meanwhile, we have an extremely efficient business model, rapid revenue acceleration, and a long runway that allows us to become profitable when needed, which means we can weather all kinds of economic storms.”

Keep that in mind as you ponder whether and when to switch to self-hosting Headscale.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Mordikan@kbin.earth 1 points 1 month ago

Headscale is great if you like networking fun, but that aside I'm not understanding why VC funding is such a black mark to the poster. Tailscale doesn't generate meaningful revenue streams as its early-stage, so it has to secure funding to continue operations until they achieve high enough revenue to go public. That's pretty standard in a business life-cycle, though. It seems like the main complaint is that Tailscale is a business. And what about the Linux Foundation? They are funded through private equity. Should you consider switching away because of that?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] gravitywell@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Just use normal wireguard, why do you need tails or heads at all?

[-] TheFrogThatFlies@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Accessing your home network that is kept inside a NAT by your ISP, without you having to acquire an online server somewhere.

[-] Flatfire@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

You really don't though. I use wireguard myself under the same scenario without issue. You just need to use some form of dynamic DNS to mitigate the potentially changing IP. Even if you're using Tailscale you'll still need to have something running a service all the time anyways, so may as well skip the proxy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

And here I am, still using OpenVPN in 2025 lol

[-] phx@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Used to run OpenVPN. Tried Wireguard and the performance was much better, although lacking some of the features some might need/want fit credential-based logins etc

[-] _TheLoneDeveloper_@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

I can highly recommend Netbird selfhosted, it has SSO support, logins, complex network topologies, it uses wireguard under the hood and it's open source.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Yeah, OpenVPN definitely doesn't have light spec requirements 😅 thankfully hardware is unfathomably powerful these days.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tills13@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I think I'll just keep using tailscale until they start enshittifying, and then set up a Headscale instance on a VPS - no need to take this step ahead of time, right?

I mean, all the people saying they can avoid any issues by doing the above - what's to stop Tailscale dropping support for Headscale in future if they're serious about enshitification? Their Linux & Android clients are open source, but not IOS or Windows so they could easily block access for them.

My point being - I'll worry when there is something substantial to worry about, til then they can know I'm using like 3 devices and a github account to authenticate. MagicDNS and the reliability of the clients is just too good for me to switch over mild funding concerns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago

I just replaced my entire setup with base wireguard as a challenge, easier than I expected it to be, and not hard to mimic tailscale.

[-] unit327@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

If you just have to talk from many devices to the one server sure, but Tailscale sure makes it easy for many to many. Also if a direct connection is impossible (e.g. firewall of china, CGNAT etc) tailscale puts a relay server in the middle for you.

[-] SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Good thing I deleted it from my homeserver a month ago.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
173 points (98.9% liked)

Selfhosted

49624 readers
371 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS