281
Oh Yeah (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

What’s so ridiculous is empathy is an evolutionary trait. It increases group fitness. Not that these psychos care about reality getting in the way of their shitty views.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

a lot of people who attained to positions of power despite being laughably unqualified did so by being ruthless, entirely self-serving, and devoid of any kind of ethical principles. can't get any of that with empathy weighing you down

[-] shawn1122@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Its unfortunate that we (or our ancestors) have structured society and institutions in a way that rewards those traits. Makes one wonder when we would need to consider a restructuring of sorts.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That was on purpose. Most revolutions (including the American revolution) have been coopted by elites who desire to have control over people.

[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Gee, this Musk fellow seems more and more like a Nazi, eh?

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago

I mean, it's not like he did multiple Nazi salutes publicly, on-stage to celebrate the election of a fascist, racist president...

reads news

Whaaaaaaaat!?

[-] shawn1122@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Worse, a Nazi on Ketamine, Mushrooms, Ecstacy and Adderall. Even Hitler was only on Meth and some type of barbiturate to help him sleep.

[-] x00z@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

In this list, only Adderall might have negative effects on empathy. Ketamine is neutral. And Shrooms and MDMA would even increase empathy.

There are edge cases ofcourse but the drugs themselves don't mean much in terms of a change in empathy.

[-] Schmoo@startrek.website 0 points 1 week ago

The drug that has the most negative impact on empathy is money, and that is his primary addiction.

[-] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Now that is a fact.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago

It's also the removal of responsibility

I can't remember where I read it but it came from the administrators of the Nuremberg Trials and their dealings with Nazi criminals they were interviewing and trying to prosecute.

Basically ... most people everywhere have a degree of empathy for the things that are happening around them and to other people. There are psychopaths that really don't care what they do to other people but they are not the norm.

Instead many people can more easily justify doing things to other people if they can remove their responsibility.

  • A leader, administrator or politician can remove their responsibility by saying that they asked for something to be done but they didn't do the thing because someone else carried out the order - so it is the underlings responsibility because they followed the order.
  • A follower or low level participant can remove their responsibility by saying that they were just following orders - they aren't responsible because they were told to do these things.

Both groups want to believe that they had no responsibility and so they aren't to blame.

It's always been like that and it's still happening now

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

A follower or low level participant can remove their responsibility by saying that they were just following orders - they aren’t responsible because they were told to do these things.

I think this one is the one they're using more and more in their favor. Young 18 year old National Guardsman aren't as likely to fight back and wouldn't know what to do if they did. Who would represent them? How would their family be treated. They have their entire life ahead of them, are they sabotaging it?

For the rest of us, how would we survive without jobs? Who would pay for the lawyer?

It's a great thing that the bigger the protest, the more likely for change.

Don’t believe the doubters: protest still has power

Nonviolent protests are twice as likely to succeed as armed conflicts – and those engaging a threshold of 3.5% of the population have never failed to bring about change.

There are, of course, many ethical reasons to use nonviolent strategies. But compelling research by Erica Chenoweth, a political scientist at Harvard University, confirms that civil disobedience is not only the moral choice; it is also the most powerful way of shaping world politics – by a long way.

Looking at hundreds of campaigns over the last century, Chenoweth found that nonviolent campaigns are twice as likely to achieve their goals as violent campaigns. And although the exact dynamics will depend on many factors, she has shown it takes around 3.5% of the population actively participating in the protests to ensure serious political change.

Working with Maria Stephan, a researcher at the ICNC, Chenoweth performed an extensive review of the literature on civil resistance and social movements from 1900 to 2006 – a data set then corroborated with other experts in the field. They primarily considered attempts to bring about regime change. A movement was considered a success if it fully achieved its goals both within a year of its peak engagement and as a direct result of its activities. A regime change resulting from foreign military intervention would not be considered a success, for instance. A campaign was considered violent, meanwhile, if it involved bombings, kidnappings, the destruction of infrastructure – or any other physical harm to people or property.

Source in article from 2019

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

It's the same reason it's so easy for people to ignore the horrors of animal AG. They're not the ones doing it, so naturally it's easier to ignore and rationalise

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago

“The fundamental weakness of Western civilization is empathy,” --Elon Musk

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

Thank you for posting this, OP. This is something we should all keep in mind.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I have previously characterised conservatism as primarily a lack of empathy. This quote does not bode well for America.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

In a speech in the 20s, Hitler was complaining about German soldiers who were kept as POWs long after French, English, and American troops had been released. He blamed this on the Jews, who he considered to be in charge of Wiemar Germany.

To this point he said that one day he'd see the Jews in camps; to see how they like it. Hitler recognized the Jewish people's capacity to suffer. That was the point.

The Sadist must be empathetic. How can you enjoy someone's suffering if you can't recognize it?

The truth is that empathy is present and necessary for the worst kinds of Evil.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

I disagree, I can see trump uncomfortable with people making fun of him to his face or ask "nasty" questions. I feel nothing and I'm generally an empathetic person. I can recognize it without feeling anything about it.

[-] Hikuro93@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The definition of empathy: "the ability to share someone else's feelings or experiences by imagining what it would be like to be in that person's situation"

Yes. By definition, if you are able to feel empathy - I.e., if you can put yourself in another person's shoes - you wouldn't behave like any sycophant in the world, from Trump and his hateful MAGA's, to Putin, to Netanyahu, to Musk, and each and every single agent of chaos and unchecked greed attempting to mess around with mankind as if they were self-proclaimed messiahs and not the representation of humanity's own cancer cells.

His observations were correct and can be applied to many situations and places worldwide. We are held back by hate and lack of empathy. We are unable to learn from the mistakes of our ancestors.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Empathy is a verb like "gardening" is though, we don't make a rational abrupt decision to empathize with a group one day because our empathy rings a bell and we bark in response obediently.

No, we nurture empathy the same way one nurtures a garden and hopefully if we do it right empathy erupts from the soil and fills our vision with new colors we could never have imagined before. Empathy dawns on us like consciousness does to a sleeping mind waking up peacefully.

Empathy is a practice in the same way genuinely religious people may describe their spirituality as a "practice" not a possession.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

As a corollary:

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle."

  • Edmund Burke

This seems to have been bastardized by history into the following much more well known, but never actually directly stated:

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

[-] nothrone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There is something very weary in people of "high status" or "power". I have never met them, but just seeing pictures of people like Trump make me so uncomfortable. There is something so weird to them. I am an atheist, but there is this intuition/feeling inside of me telling me that they are some sort of devil or a dangerous person. An all around "fakeness" to them.

I have noticed this with people high in the hierarchy ladder. It could just be because I am an anarchist, I despise hierarchies and I have distrust for authority and therefore, I despise them. But ya, I feel so uncomfortable near them. It is like looking at a fake item that everyone is admiring and I am screaming internally: "Do you not see how fake it is???".

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Some statistics suggest that ~20% of corporate leaders exhibit sociopathic/psychopathic traits. The trump family was and is full of abuse, and that shapes sociopathic traits.

You’re probably getting some of that sociopath vibe from trump and other leaders. Trump being exceptionally terrible thanks to his NPD as well.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

What were the words of Elmo musk again? That there is too much empathy in the world? Fo figure

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Wow, this is so true. Keep in mind there's technically no such thing as cold. Or dark. What we call that is simply the measure of the absence of warmth or light. I think the same thing applies to empathy...

[-] Charlxmagne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Psychopaths are physically incapable of it since birth though, not through any fault of their own, yet most are completely normal everyday people that don't commit atrocities 🤷‍♂️

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

There's a whole camp of folks on Lemmy that appear to disagree with the verdicts of Nuremburg, which is something I never expected. When it comes to Julius Striecher, a couple people feel injustice.

Like I get strict death penalty abolitionism, but damn if that's the example to hold onto. A hell of a test case.

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

They should have hung half of the fuckers they saved with Operation Paperclip too.

At least the Saturn 5 wasn’t built with slave labor. Can’t say that about the prototypes.

[-] vga@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It might be important to ask what causes people to lack empathy. Currently there seems to be a rather unscientific line of thought at least in social media that some people are just intrinsically evil.

[-] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It's nurtured

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

To psychopaths everyone else is a NPC.

[-] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I used to get a kick out of referring to strangers as NPCs...

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

INB4 "vegans bad" but I think this is also reflected in how we treat animals. I know I couldn't kill an a cow, a chicken or a pig. I see in them the same will to live in peace as I see in my fellow humans and empathy makes it so that I would see it as cruel to rob them of it.

Edit: the plants rights activists have found this comment. It's interesting, the same refusal to recognize reality, our shared reality, in which for example plants are not sentient while non-human animals are and are therefore deserving of empathy, this refusal is also at the root of fascism. People who are open to fascism refuse to recognize the reality in which a jewish person is not worse than any other person, in which immigrants aren't worse than your average neighbour down the street and in which trans people deserve as much a right to be left alone as they claim for themselves.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

You see this with zionists and in Israel

[-] PlagueShip@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

No, evil is simply flawed logic. In other words, stupid people.

[-] tamman2000@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Many of the Nazis convicted at Nuremberg were undeniably smart in the sense that they could perform abstract reasoning better than most people. Some of them had top 1% IQs and none of them had below average IQs (yes, IQ is an imperfect measure of intelligence, but at the same time, anyone who gets a 130 on an IQ test is smart... They just might not be smarter than someone with a 120 or a 110 from a different background).

I've had a long (25 years so far) and successful career in computational science/engineering. Everyone I have worked with in the last 25 year, with only 2 exceptions I can think of, was smarter than most people. I have heard some truly awful things come out of coworkers mouths. Particularly in the run up to the invasion of Iraq. People who could write software that accurately predicted airflow through jet engines who did not care that the people of Iraq were not the same people who attacked the WTC. They knew, but did not care! They simply wanted to lash out at brown people in the middle east.

No, empathy is the distinguishing characteristic.

[-] PlagueShip@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Even "Smart" people are pretty stupid and make mistakes all the time, and most don't respect truth enough to self correct. Empathy is a decision, and making that decision requires being able to make correct choices.

[-] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Smart doesn't mean logical/rational. Logic doesn't require much intelligence.

Empathy doesn't reliably prevent people from doing wrong: injustices are often defended with irrational appeals to emotion, partiality, & selective reasoning.

[-] tamman2000@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I don't think you understand what empathy is. Why are you bringing up irrational appeals to emotion?

[-] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don’t think you understand what empathy is.

Maybe your empathy is failing.

People can feel how others feel. That doesn't mean they'll morally reason well, have the integrity to defend it, or not use those feelings to justify irrational injustices even if they mean well. People are susceptible to biases that empathy alone won't defend against.

[-] tamman2000@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The comment you link to does do a better job of explaining what you're getting at, but I would still argue that those behaviors also require a partitioning of empathy, and that is a behavior most humans are susceptible to... Those who have empathy can often be made to shut it down or partition it so that it only applies to certain people.

I stand by my original comment modulo the part that asserts that it is empathy. It is not a lack of intelligence being the point.

[-] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I agree it is not intelligence, either. However, the comment above didn't make it about intelligence: they called out flawed logic, and they called failure to uphold logic an instance of stupidity. Logic & consistency are more about commitment & insistence than intelligence.

Sophisticated work can take considerable intellect to produce & defend yet be maddeningly stupid in flouting general coherence & integrity. Abstract example: non-heliocentric models strained under increasingly sophisticated math (greater intellectual demand) yet are stupid compared to heliocentric models (better parsimony & more consistent with the rest of classical mechanics).

There's also the phenomenon of smart stupidity where people (smart in specific areas) apply their intelligence irrationally: intelligence can be stupid. When people with a compatible morality arrive to unjust positions inconsistent with straightforward moral reasoning (through partiality or elaborate rationalization), some may call that flawed logic maddeningly stupid regardless of the intelligence it took to get there.

Moral reasoning takes logic, it's not merely an exercise in empathy. Cases inevitably arise with multiple considerations where emotions conflict & not everyone can be satisfied: empathy alone will not settle them & moral judgement is necessary. Insistence on consistent reasoning & follow through despite challenges is integrity. The Milgram experiments show that even as people express empathetic distress & stall with questions, too many of them will obey orders to administer the maximum electric shock to someone they think they had shocked to unconsciousness. They had empathy & felt compromised, but they needed integrity.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
281 points (99.3% liked)

Political Memes

8561 readers
1537 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS