17
Remember, article 90 of the ucmj only requires you to follow lawful orders. Turning your weapons on the same people you've sworn to protect is for sure an illegal order.
That's why they are drafting new rules for it to be legal
A goddamn shame to call myself a Marine. Any Marine executing these fascist orders are not Marines. They are fucking Traitors. The same goes for any other service member.
I was stationed in 29 for a while. They seemed like good people, I hope they still are.
I was in Quantico. Like you, I hope they still are too. Semper Fi, brother.
Every single soldier that participates in this should be tried for fucking treason.
Well if they are just standing around and not actually shooting people they are still "participating" but aren't doing anything wrong
Posse Comitatus - I haven't heard ANY news outlet mention it to date. Complete failure of the press.
well, it's been out-loud-and-proud failure since 2016 at least (we're going to skip over Gulf Wars I and II and Afghanistan)
They are owned by republiQans, they print republiQan drivel and they have long ago abandoned any other pretense. Unless you're talking about the Opinion column where they pretend they aren't bought and paid for.
Besides the obvious terrifying escalation this seems like a purposeful gesture to throw every US marine veterans' sacrifices into a heap and piss all over it, I would be livid if I was a veteran of the US marines.
The rules are already drawn up: it's not fucking allowed
Are you some kind of subject matter expert or a professor at a famous university because you know more than a corporate news journalist somehow
Edit: /s
Corporate news journalists are purposely avoiding pointing out that the Posse Comitatus Act forbids this very thing from happening.
You don't need to be a professor to have heard of this law.
The Posse Comitatus Act is pretty clear on this. Not sure why anyone would need to be a professor or even an expert.
The bar to gather accurate information yourself is really low with some basic critical thinking.
Yeah sorry was just "slamming" the press - should've used an /s
“Difficult” prospect? This administration has wanted to kill Americans for years. They finally have a drunk, stuffed shirt who will have no qualms satisfying his Daddy once given the order to do so. The days of Mattis and Esper are over.
don’t forget the supreme court has ruled anything trump does in office is not illegal. anything “official.” he’s full on “shoot now let got sort them out.”
Purely to keep the inaccuracy from spiraling: "not personally liable" is not the same as "legal".
They ruled that the person holding the office isn't personally liable for official acts unless certain extremely high bars are passed.
The act can still be illegal, you just sue the office of the president, rather than the individual who is president.
To him it's the same, but since it's not default legal, there's still lines for others to stop at. It's much easier to disobey an illegal order than a legal one.
Does he think people will weekly slink away back to their houses and shake in their boots about what Trump will do next? This will only further inflame tensions. This guy wants to Crack down, thinks he can suspend the constitution, and rule with impunity, but what he's really gonna get is a civil war. Everybody loses in a civil war. Fucking countries like Russia, Iran, and anyone else who hates us are probably reveling in the current situation.
I'm a 2A Advocate who DEFENDS SCHOOL SHOOTERS because we need GUNS to Defend from Tyranny and I FULLY SUPPORT THIS DECISION TO USE US MARINES AGAINST AMERICAN CITIZENS WHO ARE PROTESTING THE KIDNAPPING OF CHILDREN!
please include quotes or a /s … ?
No don't listen to this guy. You joke stands firm and tall in the land of absurd punctuation and capitalization.
Do not ever become reliant on the crutch of /s. /S is for the comedically weak. It is false humor that can at best lead only to a light chuckle. If your joke needs /s in order to be a joke then it's not a good joke, and you need to take the L, study the mistake, then move on.
You know it's sarcasm because they would never say "kidnap". If asked, those kids had it coming just like the dead babies that voted for Hamas.
this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
17 points (94.7% liked)
politics
25046 readers
742 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS