83
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml

I think the only thing worse than something not being private, is if the fact that it's not private is not common knowledge leading to tons of people thinking it's private.

Lemmy doesn't even show a list of what you the logged in user voted on. But it's trivial to use an external tool to see who voted on what regardless of whose account it is. I think obsecuring information like this does more harm than good, since a lot of people won't actively go out and research what kind of data in their Lemmy account is publicly accessible beyond the data they can see from the website itself.

It's been discussed before that there isn't an easy way to hide who voted for what on a federated platform while still having all the instances correctly count votes for everyone. Therefore, if actually making votes anonymous seems not to be viable, why not just make it public for everyone like Mastodon does? I don't think we should make them inbox items like on Mastodon, or at least not the same inbox as the rest of the notifications so votes don't drown them out. I think a dropdown on the content itself showing who voted on it and in which direction is probably enough. Also a tab on the user page showing a list of everything the user voted on, at least on the logged in user's own page (I mainly want this so I can keep track of what I voted on).

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 day ago

But it’s trivial to use an external tool to see who voted on what regardless of whose account it is.

It’s also trivial for us to defederate from such tools, which our instance and others have done in the case of lemvotes.

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago

Honestly I think you are right. If it were obvious votes were public people would act differently, and while that's not desirable from a content perspective, it is from a user perspective.

People don't know unless it is in their face. Put it where everyone can see it. More drama, more engagement? Whatever.

[-] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago

I think PieFed has anonymous voting as an option. This might affect making vote histories more visible.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago

If I understand it right, each real piefed account gets an associated "shadow account" used for voting and the piefed instance admin that the account is from can correlate the two if needed.

[-] MalReynolds@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

It's a checkbox in settings.

[ ] Vote privately

Votes will be sent to untrusted instances using an alt

[-] Mearuu@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 1 day ago

If the instance admin can still correlate the two, then whats the purpose of this feature?

Wouldn’t they be able to do the exact same upvote/downvote calcs as any other instance admin?

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Generally speaking, anyone can correlate the two.

I mean, when a piefed user and a piefed shadow account participate and vote in the same thread, it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to conclude they might be the same person. Look through a handful of the user's comment threads, look for piefed users voting in the preceding comments for confirmation.

Unless the user only votes in threads they do not participate in, and only participates in threads they do not vote in, correlating the two accounts is trivial.

[-] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

The difference is that voting is not publicly available, so people can't be judged for their voting behaviours, however, down voting bots etc can still be identified and banned by their home instance admin.

That being said, I don't like the feature, and would disable it if I could

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I voted your comment up btw

I'm on that honour system now

[-] ieatpwns@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You, sir, deserve and upvotr

[-] Hubi@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Honestly I think you are right. If it were obvious votes were public people would act differently

Why? Lemmy is a pseudonymous platform. Who cares what content individual users up or downvote. The votes being public is the only way to deal with brigading across instances.

[-] SatyrSack@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 1 day ago

The comments below started me on a trail that led me to a relevant comment from a Lemmy dev:

I want to remind everyone that since users overwhelmingly don't want their votes snooped on (for good reason), we will never add anything like this inside lemmy, lemmy-ui, or jerboa.

https://lemmy.ml/comment/18256302

[-] kobra@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

Wouldn’t it make more sense to either implement real vote privacy or just open the viewing window up for everyone equally?

[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Vote privacy can be tricky in an environment where every vote gets sent to thousands of instances and needs to be verified as legit via the ActivityPub protocol.

Piefed does a good job of this I think. If vote privacy is enabled, they create a second account that is used only for votes. Other instances see the votes and can validate them against the vote account but it's not tied to the actual user (except in their home server database).

A benefit of this is that the vote account for the user is always the same, so you can still track vote manipulation, and ban the vote account if needed.

[-] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 4 points 21 hours ago

Even more anti lemmy propaganda. Capitalists must be scared shitless.

[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago

In what way is a suggestion for improving Lemmy anti Lemmy propaganda?

[-] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 1 points 14 hours ago

Your wording.

"I have an idea to improve it" or even opening an issue with the devs would be the way to do this. Instead you front against something that is, lets face it, tons more private and more free than 99% of the world population give less than half a shit about.

currently, every day people try to cancel either lemmy or the devs while fascists are killing protesters in the US and the whole world tries to get totalitarian capitalist control.

Its like living in a boring horror movie.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I liked the visibility of votes on kbin, convenient to see if one was getting up or down votes from a variety of users and not just the same people over and over.

[-] SatyrSack@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 day ago

But it’s trivial to use an external tool to see who voted on what regardless of whose account it is

Is there a tool made for this out there? As far as I'm aware, the simplest way for the average user to do that is to run their own instance and then manually query its database directly, which is far from trivial.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago

This came out a day or two ago, which removes that hurdle: https://lemvotes.org/

Just paste the permalink in. Works on posts, comments, and users.

It was only a matter of time.

That’s been out a couple months now.

[-] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

There is. (YMMV, it doesn't always work)

[-] Mearuu@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 1 day ago

There are several big name accounts on the fediverse that are very likely committing vote manipulation. If you mention it in the thread you will be brigaded. I see it everyday from the same accounts. Those same threads will have highly upvoted AI slop that most times doesn’t even relate to the thread. Not even a Markov chain, just completely unrelated. The same people that upvoted the original post all upvote the same AI slop. Comments that are related to the topic have much lower engagement.

I was going to spin up my own instance to track these people and later put out a report but I am currently way too busy to do that. Maybe in a couple weeks I can get started. If anyone else is as annoyed as me about this feel free to get started tracking these people and share the data with everyone please.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

who do you think those are?

[-] Mearuu@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 1 day ago

It’s not proper to drop names until we have evidence. I could be wrong about a few. However, It unlikely that we are wrong about them all.

I think most people already suspect some of the same accounts and can offer up names but I don’t think they should either. It’s probably best to gather evidence against them without them knowing we are looking at them.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago

What's your test to determine between "AI Slop" users and active accounts? Further, I think just releasing a report with voting habits and whatnot for certain accounts without having definitive proof is just witch-hunting. If you suspect accounts, I think it's best to just report them, unless your test to determine "AI Slop" is truly infallible.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Eh, that seems like a shit ton of clutter for no real benefit.

As it is, if someone wants the info, it's easy to get, but doesn't add more junk to the UI

this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
83 points (84.9% liked)

Lemmy

13427 readers
90 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS