171
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] crumbguzzler5000@feddit.org 49 points 1 month ago

The article makes a great point that there are just too many coincidences in all of this, the theories behind the tech also seem quite sound.

The flipping of swing states on election day but not flipping enough to trigger a recount, so suspicious how a criminal president could be so popular. Especially when many people knew what was at stake, project 2025 had been vocalized a lot.

[-] TachyonTele@piefed.social 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think a big part of the whole picture could also be why in gods name did the Democrats concede before the day even ended?

[-] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

My mind went right to the DNC leaders being complicit. Maybe they were shown a window or pictures of their children or they are just shitty people.

[-] TachyonTele@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah i don't know. But they sure went back to thier mansions real quick and stayed out of the picture.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

With the Dominion voting lawsuit in place as precedent, whomever is gonna make these election claims better have an airtight fucking defense.

[-] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

It would almost be suspicious if they didn't sue with such a big case to back them up

[-] urno@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

Momentum is building on this one.

Either people looking into this are going to be “discouraged” or more evidence will be examined and a consensus will arrive.

Not saying which way. IMO the rhetoric of Trump prior to the election was basically a confession and I’ve no doubt the election was interfered with. Without any evidence, that is :|

[-] Chakravanti@monero.town 12 points 1 month ago

That wasn't confession, 53min into that "inauguration" speech, that was bragging.

[-] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

[Elon] launched his bid for Twitter [...] just 49 days after Putin invaded Ukraine. That alone should have raised every red flag. [emphasis theirs]

Why?

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago
[-] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago

Barbie was released to American audiences a mere 512 days after Putin invaded Ukraine. They have played us for absolute fools.

[-] shath@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

came to me in a dream

[-] huf@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago

it's also pretty suspicious that putin started his FULL SCALE INVASION of ukraine exactly 638 years after King Charles III of Naples and Hungary was assassinated in Buda.

[-] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago

Not only did she win, but Trump was never real; he was a figment of everyone's imagination and was never even running.

They pulled the wool over our eyes while we were looking the whole time

[-] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago
[-] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago
[-] SL3wvmnas@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I agree. While the main article is goes deep into obscure (albeit interesting) machinations, your article is very on point. It starts with

if you’re expecting a sexy story about Elon Musk messing with vote-counting software from outer space, sorry, you won’t get that here.

And then lays down the numbers:

— 4,776,706 voters were wrongly purged from voter rolls according to US Elections Assistance Commission data.

— By August of 2024, for the first time since 1946, self-proclaimed “vigilante” voter-fraud hunters challenged the rights of 317,886 voters. The NAACP of Georgia estimates that by Election Day, the challenges exceeded 200,000 in Georgia alone.

— No fewer than 2,121,000 mail-in ballots were disqualified for minor clerical errors (e.g. postage due).

— At least 585,000 ballots cast in-precinct were also disqualified.

— 1,216,000 “provisional” ballots were rejected, not counted.

— 3.24 million new registrations were rejected or not entered on the rolls in time to vote.

It continues listing concrete things people can directly influence. I liked the article, thank you soo much. Very insightful.

[-] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

That argument is straightforward and clear and should be spread more widely than it is.

[-] psivchaz@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago

The numbers feel too coincidental and so a theory like space-based voting machine fraud doesn't seem as outlandish as it should. At the same time, it attributes to these people a level of finesse and planning that I just don't see from them.

The brute force "suppress votes and lie constantly" is much more Trump's style. It's basically his whole brand.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

Hitler was a moron, that doesn't mean the Nazis didn't have any clever engineers.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 month ago

These kind of conspiracy theories downplay how much of a piece of shit Nation we have become and how selfish the populace voted.

[-] Chakravanti@monero.town 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

These aren't theories. Trump said, in his inauguration speech at 53min in, that a non-citizen did that just for him and "rigged the election." He says that he would KNOT have won but that he get the role anyways.

Of course his first task is to clip the buyout on the last check of court in his last time in place. Since then, butchering anything and everything in the "governing" and started the Auction to hand out all parts we built and ruled to...Billionaires? He is pending every USD to show how worthless it is now that it has no real guarentee left since they shot the one guy trying to validate it with Gold the way we used to.

That was Russia? Totally not the CIA.

Doesn't matter now. Everyone is tricked to think the "example" (defenition via the first public "anon" written description) is the real deal despite showing everything, what it does, where, from, to, amount, etc. into a log that will never end.

It is the Snitchcoin. Force corporations to use it so that we can tax the collection of thieves pretending to be human.

Don't take my obvious source be accepted as the REAL trustable means. Do your research. Understand how the open source works. Then you don't need my word. You will understand why Monero was kicked out of nearly every gamble box of loss used to carry pretendables like Zcash, etc.

Meh...do whatever. I ain't telling you what to do like they ate during this pig bank gluttony.

[-] deaf_fish@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago

It was weak and impotent when the Republicans did it. So I guess the Democrats feel left out.

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

How is this relevant? Not only you have a king now, but he wasn't elected by popular vote anyways, he was elected by the electoral college, who aren't bound to follow the popular vote.

[-] match@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago

The relevance is that when he is overthrown, the history books will have more justifications as to why

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There were a few offhand things Trump said before the election that sure sounded like he was letting slip that the election was rigged - but at the time I chalked them up to his usual overconfident bullshit. Some guy made a video a few months ago highlighting some of the statistical anomalies shown in the article. I thought he made a very persuasive case for vote manipulation but lacked technical evidence. Now that's coming out as well. I sure hope this plays out like it should. All it takes is one senator to formally challenge the legitimacy of the election and start an investigation.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
171 points (85.2% liked)

Hacker News

2099 readers
377 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS