I agree. While the main article is goes deep into obscure (albeit interesting) machinations, your article is very on point. It starts with

if you’re expecting a sexy story about Elon Musk messing with vote-counting software from outer space, sorry, you won’t get that here.

And then lays down the numbers:

— 4,776,706 voters were wrongly purged from voter rolls according to US Elections Assistance Commission data.

— By August of 2024, for the first time since 1946, self-proclaimed “vigilante” voter-fraud hunters challenged the rights of 317,886 voters. The NAACP of Georgia estimates that by Election Day, the challenges exceeded 200,000 in Georgia alone.

— No fewer than 2,121,000 mail-in ballots were disqualified for minor clerical errors (e.g. postage due).

— At least 585,000 ballots cast in-precinct were also disqualified.

— 1,216,000 “provisional” ballots were rejected, not counted.

— 3.24 million new registrations were rejected or not entered on the rolls in time to vote.

It continues listing concrete things people can directly influence. I liked the article, thank you soo much. Very insightful.

The numbers feel too coincidental and so a theory like space-based voting machine fraud doesn't seem as outlandish as it should. At the same time, it attributes to these people a level of finesse and planning that I just don't see from them.

The brute force "suppress votes and lie constantly" is much more Trump's style. It's basically his whole brand.

That argument is straightforward and clear and should be spread more widely than it is.

The relevance is that when he is overthrown, the history books will have more justifications as to why

No. He wasn't. Computer cracker rewrote the software that the computers followed with blatant lies.

Event that shit that you think counts otherwise, is not in any relevancy upon any "if" to any result that was a product of a completely fucking obvious fraud.

You either know you're a CIA asset, or you think you got some gorram nonsense lack of logic denial of what is not difficult to see if you stop picking up other people's literal shit, wiping it on your face with open eyes, and think that that thing that you keep mentioning is anything other than a trick you chose to accept in exchange for what they told you life was and you didn't ask any real questions or even bother to decode the not-paper or read any of the books explaining everything about what that means.

They erased the gold relevancy and waited another full gen before people forgot how real life worked before they accepted the sigil and let go what life is.

Y'all say these things sometimes that make one think you just wander around in a nihilistic haze of submission and defeatism.

I think a big part of the whole picture could also be why in gods name did the Democrats concede before the day even ended?

Yeah, I don't see what they're hoping to accomplish with this. The pool has been poisoned for years by baseless claims from the far right about election rigging. No amount of evidence is going to change those peoples' minds, and for the others, you're preaching to the choir.

It would almost be suspicious if they didn't sue with such a big case to back them up

I believe the court case will weigh the available evidence: https://apnews.com/press-release/access-newswire/diane-sare-kamala-harris-kamala-harris-es-kirsten-gillibrand-new-hampshire-225173eaaf66b420844508516b365caf

That wasn't confession, 53min into that "inauguration" speech, that was bragging.

it's also pretty suspicious that putin started his FULL SCALE INVASION of ukraine exactly 638 years after King Charles III of Naples and Hungary was assassinated in Buda.