12
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

The fediverse feed isn’t algorithmically ranked, or subject to any of Threads’ rules or moderation; it’s just a reverse-chronological feed of stuff you follow.

'Member when Facebook was like that? You know, the way people want it?

[-] deedan06_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

Guess all those blocks had a reason after all.

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

I'm surprised they're still interested in ActivityPub.

Hot Take: This is good because its easier for people to leave threads, since they can still contact their friends on threads. I do think having most instances block them is also good, so people can have a choice (I personally don't want threads).

[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I'm not surprised, but I agree with the hot take, so maybe it's only warm.

I think they keep interest in ActivityPub in order to keep regulators concerned with Antitrust at bay. The Fediverse isn't a real threat in Meta's view and keeping an engineer or two on it in order to stay invested is worth the cost.

Threads can say they are making an honest effort to work with the larger open source community and open federated internet. As an added bonus, it isn't actually a lie. Now the effort they're putting in is the absolute minimum, but it's there.

Now I still do think this is a positive. While most people on Threads will probably never leave, it does introduce them to the wider Fediverse. It makes the Fediverse a less scary thing.

[-] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Still not fully integrated, but it's nice to see broader ActiviyPub adoption beyond "follow a handful of users who opted-in". I never expected Meta to be the company inching towards federation and not bluesky. Makes me wonder if Tumblr will ever follow through with their promises to federate.

edit: To the (sadly predictable) response that "Meta will screw you over in a heartbeat" YES, of COURSE they will, that's why it's GOOD to be able to access Threads content safely and privately from a non-Meta controlled platform.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Tumblr is being reworked to have a Wordpress backend right now, and Wordpress already has well working ActivityPub support, so yes, Tumblr will very likely happen once they made the switch.

I suspect the technical debt in Tumblr was larger than expected when the first announce federation support, and now it became nearly a full rewrite, which takes time.

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Tumblr also downsized to 25 employees (including T&S). I don't expect anything groudbreaking from them soon.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Nahhh, Meta sucks ass and will screw you over in a heartbeat. What's in it for them is the question.

[-] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Data. User data. Always has been.

FB right now is probably 90% bots and AI. The Fediverse isn’t—for the moment being. I’m sure they found a way to tap into it by keeping a door open while pretending to help aerate the room.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

They also want to control the headlines that make it to the front page like other major instances do.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago
[-] vermaterc@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Honestly, I thought Meta talking about Fediverse integration was just marketing bullshit. Are they really doing it? 🤔

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago

They've been doing it for quite a while. Very slowly. The problem is it's currently unidirectional, and opt-in. I imagine its the same reason Apple has adopted RCS (also opt-in): legal pressure.

If they just ignore it completely, legislators might completely fuck them like they did Apple with alternative payments. But if they kinda half-ass it then they can point to it and say "SEE, WE HAVE INTEROP! NO MONOPOLY!"

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

Its a bit charitable to call threads a monopoly since no one uses it.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago
  1. Bit charitable to say "no one uses it" when they have >300M MAU
  2. Wasn't talking about Threads, I was talking about Meta.
[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

I honestly doubt that, It has no relevance -- at all. I see screenshots of bluesky posts everywhere, but rarely see threads posts.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago

You're giving me anecdotes and I'm giving you statistics.

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I know, but the source for your statistic is Meta themselves.

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

35810 readers
69 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS