242
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
(page 2) 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's what you get if you believe that laws written a quarter millenium ago are still some kind of holy infallable scripture.

Weapons have changed enormously since then and so has every part of society.

Back when the 2nd ammendment was written, the average weapon of the military and of private citizens would be about the same: front-loaded, single-shot gun. Soldiers had very low standards of training and militias still formed the backbone of the military.

It's totally possible for a large amount of private citizens to stand a decent chance against the military.

Nowadays a private citizen would have some kind of gun, while the military has tanks, planes, missiles and aircraft carriers. Even if half the country would take up arms, they'd stand no chance against the US military, which makes the whole point of "resisting unlawful government" moot.

[-] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Yours are the words of an armchair porkbelly who has absolutely no idea whatsoever how militaries or revolutions or even guns themselves work.

Get in the cattle car.

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

... says the armchair porkbelly revolutionary.

How many revolutions did you fight in, mighty keyboard warlord?

[-] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

this is going great for you

[-] nomy@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

Bro look at Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan,

Better toys for your soldiers doesn't mean you automatically win the war.

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

On the home turf, yes it does. Also, the US only committed a fraction of their military power in these wars. Do you think the same would happen when the war zone was the US itself?

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 0 points 1 month ago
[-] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

The things that radical fascist media talking heads are hyperbolically lying about nonstop are justification for invoking 2A rights.

Unfortunately liberals are pussy-assed bitches so nothing will happen and they'll all be chunked into an oven.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

Almost every tyrannical regime in the 20th century systematically disarmed their citizenry, leading to some of the greatest atrocities the world has ever seen. It's not a coincidence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You guys should take these thoughts somewhere else. This specific sub is for just small silly thoughts not politics like 2a rights and the rise of fascism.

[-] blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk -1 points 1 month ago

What's unlawful? You voted them in. Bearing arms against the government is unlawful. Anyone who thinks they can make a stand and shoot a few people to stand up to the government will find themselves arrested quickly and with all their neighbours supporting their arrest.

There is no amount of force that could reasonably be brought that would topple the government.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ssroxnak@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Well one party told gun owners that they're awful people. Of course a chunk of them are gonna be okay with what's going on. The people who hated on them are being "owned". Can you blame them for not rising up to fight the party that pretends to give them lip service?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
242 points (92.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

36588 readers
215 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS