18

A hospital in the Israeli town of Beersheba has been hit as Iran fired a barrage of missiles, with the conflict between the two countries continuing into a seventh day.

Iran said the strike had targeted a military site close to the hospital, not the facility itself. Dozens of people were reported injured in several locations across Israel, including near Tel Aviv.

After visiting the Soroka Medical Centre on Thursday, Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz said Iran's supreme leader "can no longer be allowed to exist".

Meanwhile, Israel's military said it had targeted Iran's nuclear sites including the "inactive" Arak heavy water reactor and Natanz facility.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago

Israel calls the attack "criminal" but had no problem levelling hospitals in Gaza...

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 14 points 4 weeks ago

You have to be special kind of a scumbag to intentionally bomb hospitals full of innocent people.

Iran is also bad.

[-] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

This is the only sane take. Bombing hospitals is a war crime for a goddamn reason.

There is simply no excuse for this, both sides should be held liable for their war crimes.

[-] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago

it will be considered a war crime

but it'll boil my blood when she the countries who defended and sponsored the Gaza genocide will come out to declare Iran bombing a hospital a war crime and will cooperate with the ICC (or appropriate body) to prosecute Iran.

because bombing all the hospitals in a country is fine, but one is Israel does it

[-] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, I agree. Not sure why the west is so eager to shield Israel from their responsibilities, but Netanyahu and co should stand trial for their crimes against humanity. But so should Khamenei.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

If we want to hold Iran to account for this one war crime and Israel to account for its thousands of war crimes, that sounds like Justice, yes. Lets do Israel first.

[-] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed. I don't care who gets tried in The Hague first though, so long as both get their lawful comeuppance.

[-] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

Now that they are fighting people who can actually retaliate, maybe more people will realize they don't want to die for something that means nothing to them. The brainwashing is bad, though, so probably not for a while, if ever.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

This is my hope.

Vietnam taught the US that war actually means something when your country's actions force you to become involved when you didn't want to be.

[-] f34r@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 weeks ago

Whoever justifies this - shame on you. I feel sorry for every innocent soul going through this - Israeli, Palestinian or Iranian. We are all brothers and sisters. Eye for an eye will make the whole world blind.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 9 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Well, Israel and its allies provided a lot of statements that justify attacks on hospitals.

As the BBC reported, there is military and intelligence sites nearby, which is consistent with Irans claim of having targeted legitimate military targets. I guess the Israelis should be condemned here for using their hospitals as human shields, like they have accused their targets of, usually falsely.

I hope that as little Civilians as possible get hurt, however the attacking nation crying wolf about collateral damage, after butchering Civilians in the tens of thousands during the past years and well before that too, cannot help but raise an eyebrow. This comes especially as many people in the Israel civilian population have cheered on massacre against Civilians.

[-] martin4598@lemm.ee 4 points 4 weeks ago

Not justifying. Just running out of empathy after all the Gaza shit. Sorry.

[-] Makhno@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Israel is currently genociding an entire nation of people. There ain't no "eye for an eye"

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 4 weeks ago

How accurate are Iranian missiles compared to Israeli jets? Is this an issue of limited accuracy or intentional targeting?

I'm presently willing to give more benefit of the doubt to Iran regarding missiles fired from hundreds (thousands?) of miles away than I am to Israel who has a very strong track record of intentionally targeting civilians in undeniable ways (e.g. snipers shooting children). Past behavior is a fair reason to be biased.

Only a monster wants to see civilian deaths. Realistically, I don't consider military deaths as "good" either; in modern combat it's more about military structures and equipment.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

Oh the irony.

While Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz told reporters: "Khamenei openly declares that he wants Israel destroyed - he personally gives the order to fire on hospitals."

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 weeks ago

The irony is so rich indeed.

May they get what they deserve.

[-] McDropout@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I hope how the impunity of Israel makes bombing hospitals a normal occurrence in war. I have a feeling bombing hospitals will become the norm in wars.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
18 points (90.9% liked)

World News

48443 readers
1080 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS