1112
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago

Who cares? He was inoeached before already and it literally did NOTHING

Wake me up when this bullshit is actually over, all this "oohh, THIS will end him for sure!" every week is tiring

[-] D_C@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I completely agree.
However, this is exactly what he wants. The more tired we all become of his bullshit and the more we wave it away then the more bullshit he pulls, and gets away with.

If someone, anyone, had given him any consequences to his actions over the past few decades he wouldn't be like he is. If just one person took him outside and beat the living fuck out of him then I feel things would be different.
Things definitely wouldn't be like they are now. They may not be much better, but they would be better.

Again, I agree it's tiring. But I also think we shouldn't give up.
So I hope you, and anyone who reads this, starts to feel less of "this is tiring!" And more of "this is tiring l.. but we can't let that rich obese orange rapist drag me down and get away with it!"

Don't give up!! Fight him. Pull him up on every single thing and ridicule him.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fuck it, impeach him every single fucking day; he's got enough crimes for it. Lock up congress and make the GOP cult show up every day and bend the knee to the orange fascist instead of doing a single thing for the US.

Also people in democratic leadership roles should start prosecuting his minions. ICE arresting legal citizens? Straight to jail. Barring lawmakers from detention facilities? Believe it or not, straight to jail.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Ah yes, I remember Obama getting impeached for bombing Syria.

And for that matter, Trump getting impeached for killing Soleimani, the leader of Iran, while he was in Iraq.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kokesh@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

He can rape 5 year old on a press conference and won't be impeached.

i mean he DID do that but the case was dismissed when the accuser got death threats

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

She was 13, but yeah. We have a pedophile, convicted rapist who is also a Nazi as our president. It's kind of hard to believe.

[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Pedantic correction: he was never convicted of rape in a criminal case, he was found liable for damages caused by his sexual assault in a civil case.

This makes him an adjudicated rapist not a convicted one.

i hate the fucking united states

I don't think that's true, I hope you just hate our leadership. And trust me, many of us here do as well.

[-] rpa@europe.pub 35 points 1 day ago

I remember all it took was some jizz...

[-] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago

Now we have an actual cum stain running this shit show

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 day ago

Only impeachment that will matter is a vigilante with better aim

[-] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

impeachment shmimshmeashment, i want a conviction and an escort out of the building

[-] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Can anyone explain what happened to the articles of impeachment that were introduced a few months ago?

[-] iamjackflack@lemm.ee 21 points 2 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

For what? For doing what the USA does best?

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The problems, the House and Senate are controlled by the Russian supporting MAGA clowns. I believe Mango Mussolini has a 60 day window before he needs to end the military engagement against Iran. For the moment, a drunk, a felon and Signal App are controlling the US military.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

Lol, no it isn't. Ever since Cold War times, the law has been that the president can not only launch missiles, but even deploy troops on the ground, without congressional approval. There's a limit on how long the troops can be deployed, iirc, but once you've started a ground invasion it's a bit late.

Obviously it's unconstitutional, but there's no legal precedent that would say so. If you think this is the first time this has happened, you really need to learn more about history. The US never formally declared war on Vietnam, for example.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Isn't the president allowed 90 days before congress is required?

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Yes, also he didn't declare war. Anyone old enough to remember 9-11 knows what is up.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Not happening. Next quotum

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Can we impeach him out of a cannon?

Into the sun?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
1112 points (97.1% liked)

People Twitter

7459 readers
1311 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS