284
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 1 points 35 minutes ago

No chance of being born in New Zealand I see

[-] nevetsg@aussie.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

So me being born in Australia was like getting a mythic prize in a loot crate.

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

How about chances of being born in the ocean, or even on this planet?

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

With all the scientists and cruises that tour around Antarctica, I am not convinced that the chances of being born there are a flat 0. It might be less than 1% but no way it's 0.

At least 11 babies have been born in Antarctica.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

0.0000001375%!

(This is based solely on roughly how many people exist, not birth rates, because I ain't doing the real math for what is ultimately a rounding error)

[-] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 9 points 6 hours ago

Y'all probably already knew about the Valeriepieris circle, I guess.

[-] huppakee@feddit.nl 2 points 6 hours ago

I did, but now I also know about Danny Quah's 2015 circle :)

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

Do you come from a land of plenty?

Statistically, no.

[-] altphoto@lemmy.today -1 points 2 hours ago

But if you do it per country things would look different. The US would have the highest percentage of people from all around the planet while all the other countries would have like 0.0001% from other places. I just made that number up, but yeah, you won't find diversity as you find it here in the USA.... Let's cherish that, let's keep our melting pot alive and well!

[-] Fleur_@aussie.zone 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The US isn't even in the top 20 of proportion of people living there born abroad. They do however have the highest total number of immigrants.

Data compiled from a UN source

[-] mercano@lemmy.world 31 points 10 hours ago

New Zealand’s gone missing again, I’m assuming it’s lumped in with Australia.

[-] huppakee@feddit.nl 5 points 6 hours ago

It's crazy they did include a bit of Russia near Alaska and also bothered to add the Galapagos (where nobody lives) but omitted NZ

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 18 points 9 hours ago

No it means there is zero percent chance of New Zealand

[-] Gorge@lemm.ee 3 points 6 hours ago

New Zealand is in stealth mode. We keep it off the maps so trump doesn't know it exists and leaves it alone

[-] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 81 points 12 hours ago

I've already been born so my odds should be updated.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 9 points 11 hours ago

This is actually percent of each population that believes in reincarnation

[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 4 points 9 hours ago

The continents are eventually going to disappear. It should be a 99.99% chance

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

What time frame does this represent?

Births in 2025 might be majority subsaharan Africa.

[-] TechLich@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It would be really interesting to see chances of being born across all time. Like what is the probability of being born here and now vs. somewhere else in the past or the future.

You would have to make some predictions based on population growth and maybe model a few different possible apocalypses (average species lifetime/meteor probabilities/nuclear doomsday/climate disaster etc.) but it would be a fun model to play with.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

Underrated comment. Given that African population is rocketing towards a projected 2 billion, while Asian birthrates are dropping thru the floor (even India is now only at replacement), the data from this map must be out of date.

[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 20 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Remember everyone: 100.00% does not mean all, and 0.00% does not mean none, just like 50.00% does not mean exactly half. They all are accurate to 0.005% points.

[-] match@pawb.social 17 points 8 hours ago

So there's a chance I'll be born in Antarctica?

[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 2 points 3 hours ago

Small chance you still might, I'll cross my fingers for you

[-] match@pawb.social 2 points 3 hours ago

thanks! I'm working on it

[-] matti@sopuli.xyz 12 points 7 hours ago

You, no. Some other guy, maybe.

[-] huppakee@feddit.nl 1 points 6 hours ago
[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

Yes, there was a chance 'you' could have been born in Antarctica.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 8 hours ago

IIRC Argentina facilitated a few births on the outlying islands to make a point. Usually kids are avoided in such a harsh and precarious place, though.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Yes, though then we’ll have to test your blood to make sure.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 55 points 12 hours ago

It’s not zero for Antarctica, just nearly zero. 11 people have been born in Antarctica. Mostly argentinians but also a couple chileans.

[-] zelgo@lemmy.world 18 points 11 hours ago

Okay and that would still be less than 0.00% which is the significant figures on the chart. They can't just put 0.01.because 11 out 8 billion people were born there.

[-] huppakee@feddit.nl 3 points 6 hours ago

It's a good reminder though that 0.0% doesn't have to equal 0

[-] 5oap10116@lemmy.world 17 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

They could have put <0.01 but either way there's no real society/culture there to bwgin with. I personally wouldn't have even included it on the map.

I will say if they were included on education stats, they would probably top all global charts.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

Challenge accepted! Proceeds to breed in Antarctica

[-] janus2@lemmy.zip 10 points 12 hours ago

I misread this as "Chances of being born in each Connecticut" and while I know humans are fond of naming places after existing places, I'd be surprised if every continent has a place officially named Connecticut

[-] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 hours ago

Antarctica doesn't have one apparently

[-] Lembot_0003@lemmy.zip 10 points 12 hours ago

Penguins: well, we're going extinct then...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 hours ago

there are three continents, four if you have to add Australia

don't give me that canal crap either, i will die on this hill

[-] infeeeee@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Continents are mostly a cultural subdivisions, not based on geology, it's pointless to debate about it. Good video on the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrsxRJdwfM0

[-] LiterallyLMAO@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

it's pointless to debate about it.

Good sir, this is the internet!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] yozul@beehaw.org 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Australia's bigger than Antarctica, and if you don't care about that "canal crap" then there are only really two continents bigger than it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
284 points (96.7% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

4581 readers
464 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS