486
submitted 10 months ago by ooli3@sopuli.xyz to c/map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 117 points 10 months ago

I've already been born so my odds should be updated.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

This is actually percent of each population that believes in reincarnation

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] teft@lemmy.world 72 points 10 months ago

It’s not zero for Antarctica, just nearly zero. 11 people have been born in Antarctica. Mostly argentinians but also a couple chileans.

[-] zelgo@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

Okay and that would still be less than 0.00% which is the significant figures on the chart. They can't just put 0.01.because 11 out 8 billion people were born there.

[-] 5oap10116@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They could have put <0.01 but either way there's no real society/culture there to bwgin with. I personally wouldn't have even included it on the map.

I will say if they were included on education stats, they would probably top all global charts.

[-] huppakee@feddit.nl 6 points 10 months ago

It's a good reminder though that 0.0% doesn't have to equal 0

[-] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And lets not get into the nationality thing there

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mercano@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago

New Zealand’s gone missing again, I’m assuming it’s lumped in with Australia.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 25 points 10 months ago

No it means there is zero percent chance of New Zealand

[-] Gorge@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

New Zealand is in stealth mode. We keep it off the maps so trump doesn't know it exists and leaves it alone

[-] huppakee@feddit.nl 7 points 10 months ago

It's crazy they did include a bit of Russia near Alaska and also bothered to add the Galapagos (where nobody lives) but omitted NZ

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago

No chance of being born in New Zealand I see

[-] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

It's more proof it doesn't exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Remember everyone: 100.00% does not mean all, and 0.00% does not mean none, just like 50.00% does not mean exactly half. They all are accurate to 0.005% points.

[-] match@pawb.social 19 points 10 months ago

So there's a chance I'll be born in Antarctica?

[-] matti@sopuli.xyz 20 points 10 months ago

You, no. Some other guy, maybe.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 25 points 10 months ago

Maps without New Zealand

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 21 points 10 months ago

I'm not so sure I would trust any statistics from a map that's missing New Zealand.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nevetsg@aussie.zone 21 points 10 months ago

So me being born in Australia was like getting a mythic prize in a loot crate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

With all the scientists and cruises that tour around Antarctica, I am not convinced that the chances of being born there are a flat 0. It might be less than 1% but no way it's 0.

At least 11 babies have been born in Antarctica.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

0.0000001375%!

(This is based solely on roughly how many people exist, not birth rates, because I ain't doing the real math for what is ultimately a rounding error)

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Do you come from a land of plenty?

Statistically, no.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Technically Antarctica isn't 0. There's a civilian colony and at least one baby has been born there.

[-] Soulg@ani.social 24 points 10 months ago

Eh it rounds down at that point

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 23 points 10 months ago

11 people were born there. That's a ~0.00000000133649348822 chance. Small but not impossible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] M137@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Yet Americans act like they're 90% of the world and no one and nothing outside the US matters.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 14 points 10 months ago

I think those chances vary a lot based on where your parents live.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 10 points 10 months ago

How about chances of being born in the ocean, or even on this planet?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 10 points 10 months ago

Y'all probably already knew about the Valeriepieris circle, I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] janus2@lemmy.zip 10 points 10 months ago

I misread this as "Chances of being born in each Connecticut" and while I know humans are fond of naming places after existing places, I'd be surprised if every continent has a place officially named Connecticut

[-] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 10 months ago

Antarctica doesn't have one apparently

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

What time frame does this represent?

Births in 2025 might be majority subsaharan Africa.

[-] TechLich@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

It would be really interesting to see chances of being born across all time. Like what is the probability of being born here and now vs. somewhere else in the past or the future.

You would have to make some predictions based on population growth and maybe model a few different possible apocalypses (average species lifetime/meteor probabilities/nuclear doomsday/climate disaster etc.) but it would be a fun model to play with.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] twice_hatch@midwest.social 9 points 10 months ago

Can't believe I used up all my luck for that

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Fellow Antarctican?

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago

Ok, now make this but per land area.

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
486 points (96.4% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

6094 readers
4 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS