341
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 109 points 1 week ago

For anyone else who was confused by the screenshot:

Cat turd said there were no leaks and Democrats didn't know.

Then, as soon as trump said it was the Democrats fault somehow, cat turd did a 180 and says the Democrats are traitors.

[-] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 20 points 1 week ago

I read that as sarcasm. "Well of course Trump now blames the Democrats."

[-] breecher@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago

It's not. The guy is a Trump sycophant.

[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Nah, he was always blaming the Dems. The first tweet says there wasn’t a leak because the Dems didn’t know- implying that if they had known, then it would have leaked.

The second one is him confirming what he already thought based on Trump’s accusation.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Well at least his username made sense!

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Oh, I thought he was calling Trump treasonous, cause how could uninformed democrats leak information. But having head about catturd your explanation makes more sense.

[-] 0ndead@infosec.pub 87 points 1 week ago

I was trying to figure out if Catturd had changed sides, then I remembered I don’t give a fuck.

[-] KnitWit@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago

Sounds like I’m glad I don’t know who that is.

[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago

Huge MAGA nut. Will go the grave praising him for all time. Trump could personally cut his dick off, and he would thank him in a tweet.

[-] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago

Almost certainly being bankrolled by someone.

[-] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 21 points 1 week ago

You certainly should be. Name suits him.

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 16 points 1 week ago

If anything, it's not repulsive enough.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago

Apparently the screenshot is to be read as Catturd proudly proclaiming that democrats weren't even briefed, so they could not have leaked anything.
But when Trump said a few days later that democrats leaked information, Catturd still immediately accepted that as truth.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Same here. He had some in-group fighting and drama going on a while back that threw me off. I was only hoping the other side wouldn't coopt this asshole when clicking through.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

I don't know the schmuck and I'm going to keep it that way. Sounds not to relevant either way.

I mean what's in a name?

[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Didn't Trump basically go on social media and say I'M GOING TO DO SOMETHING WITHIN 2 WEEKS! And then trucks were seen leaving the nuclear sites?

Anyone know the timeline?

[-] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 week ago

leaked (about failure)

perfect flight

These two can't be true at the same time. But who cares?

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well, the flying planes were a beauty to behold!

[-] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago

It's like reading an AI's first post. Catturd types like there is an important point to amplify with wisdom, but all the words have 0 impact. Probably has something to do with the commentary being over an orange manchild throwing feces around to see what sticks... again.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I'd call him a repeater if I were to name him something, much like Dim Tool and Candace Owens. Their only job is to appeal to different people with a different image but with the same message.

[-] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Are they calling Hegseth a Democrat, at least inadvertently?

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My bet is on tulsi, but the administration is so pervasively infiltrated by Russian assets and hegseths drunk texts that it could be any number

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Why would an opposing party be briefed on an ongoing military operation?

[-] breecher@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

In a functioning democracy that would be a quite natural act.

[-] ddplf@szmer.info 11 points 1 week ago

Seems natural that they should. After all, they may be the ones that would have to clean up the mess in the future.

And also because this operation may lead to incoming war, which cannot be legally declared without congress aproval, even if they don't have the majority.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Bipartisan committees are there for this but they weren't briefed, secdef wasn't even briefed.

Let me ask you something, why wouldn't they?

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 week ago

I get why they would be briefed after the operation, but before and during seems like an unneeded security concern

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

It's been protocol for something like 80 years or something like that ever since those two big wars. It's because we have interests everywhere that not everyone is aware of so networking is necessary so we can be prepared for consequences before they happen because reacting afterwards unprepared is generally much more costly.

[-] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Then there's that whole pesky legal thing where the president is not allowed to start wars without Congressional approval...

[-] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 1 week ago

I wish cat turd would suck himself off in private, this is pathetic.

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
341 points (97.8% liked)

People Twitter

7576 readers
639 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS