52
submitted 1 month ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

The Senate and House versions of the Republican tax bill would reverse efforts to modernize the energy system and reduce greenhouse emissions.

Access options:

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago

Is the goal to ensure the US falls behind the rest of the world?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

They do no believe the world is going to last, so their plan is to squeeze every bit of juice out of it as fast as possible before the End.

[-] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

To be fair, the US has been behind the rest of the world in most things for quite awhile.

What they want is total control and fear-based loyalty.

[-] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No...

The goal is to obscenely enrich to the fullest extent possible any/all Fossil Fuel Robber Barons and all their "friends" (read: the ones that initiated these policies).

They simply care for nothing else like climate change, the planet, people (rank and file), etc... (unless you count working to accelerate the Biblical End Times).

🤡 🖕 💩 💩

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Yes — the racism and hate are more important to them.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Those are just tools for controlling the masses. The oligarchs want control and will burn this country down to keep it.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

And the sweet, sweet short-term cash for the right people.

[-] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

The plan is to reduce us to third world poverty. Use the collapse as an excuse for total austerity. Then, in ride the billionaires to the rescue, and most of us will serve them, just to stay alive.

[-] meyotch@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

I will happily serve the billionaires.

With a side of coleslaw.

They'll ride in, but it won't be to save us. It'll be only any exactly to the extent they can buy up the bankrupt economy. It's exactly the post-Soviet Russian collapse wealth privatisation scenario.

[-] pezhore@infosec.pub 7 points 1 month ago

“You cannot have this kind of whiplash,” Etheridge said. “If every four years tax policy changes drastically like this, we are not going to be able to build anything great in this country.”

No shit.if democrats ever get a trifecta again (highly unlikely) they'd better fucking pass actual laws rather than this budget bill crap.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

That means actually having 60+ votes or ending the filibuster

[-] turdburglar@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

does it tho? tommy dumb fuck tuberville single handily shut down military appointments for months. moscow mitch just decided not to have senate hearings for garland.

the dems need to kick schumer in the balls and while he’s down get some fuken things took care of. they need to figure out how to out-moscow moscow mitch.

strongly worded letters can get fucked. we need some ‘well what the fuck are you gonna do about it?’

i used to call myself a dem but that’s just embarrassing now. not sure what i am anymore, you know, aside from pissed and frustrated.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

There are things they Democrats should have been doing in addition to what they've done, but they can't actually stop budget bills like this one unless four Republican Senators join them.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Feel free to downvote me if you want, but downvotes don't change the truth.

The filibuster is an absolutely necessary evil. Yeah, it sucks when the GOP use it to block Democrat policies. But it's also been used by Democrats to stop the worst of GOP's policies as well. Dems have been asking for the end of the filibuster for years now, and people like me have been saying that eventually the GOP would return to power and shove it right down our throats. I believe it was Mitch McConnell who warned Democrats of exactly that when they voted to remove the filibuster for judge confirmations. And then the GOP took control and we've been paying for it ever since, with McConnell saying "What did you expect? We told you we would do this." the entire time.

And the same thing would happen here. As bad as this Trump administration has been (and it has been BAD), imagine how much worse it would be if there were no filibuster. Even if Chuck Schumer had a spine, it wouldn't matter. He'd have no voice that would be heard. They'd have no power. No way to stop the GOP from doing literally anything they wanted. Their only purpose would be to show up and watch. To make sure that there was a quorum. That's it.

Granted, they're not doing a whole lot of anything now. But the filibuster is a tool that we can use to at least try to stop the worst of the worst. And it's basically the only tool we've got left. It may not do much, but the last thing you want to do is willingly give that last weapon over to your enemy.

We've already been down this road already, and have been paying for it ever since. The 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court and Trump flooding the federal courts with his hand-picked cronies are a direct result of this. Why do people think it's a good idea to do it again?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

An actual speaking filibuster, yeah.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yes. This bullshit where a back-stabbing little "centrist" asshole like Joe Lieberman could raise a pinky finger and shit-can something like the public option [1] is nonsense.

At least make motherfuckers like him WORK for it. I want REAL filibusters to be required to have such a thing. Not the mere mention of someone indicating that they would filibuster something.

[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago

I like how you Think the Democrats are using the Filibuster right now!

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Never said they were. In fact, I specifically said "Granted, they're not doing a whole lot of anything right now". But just because this group of Democrat leaders are feckless morons doesn't mean we just willingly hand it over to Republicans and prevent possible future Democrat leaders from at least having the option to use it in the future.

The only people who benefit from ending the filibuster are Republicans.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Ending the filibuster would need to be accompanied by a rapid plan to essentially erase the Republican Party in its current form: mass political education, deep and broad electoral reforms, vast increases in small-d democratic participation, and probably many more radical reforms that would essentially rewrite the country.

But this would probably also erase the Democratic Party too, so they'd never do it.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The problem is that the GOP plans are to just shit on everything and tell Democrats to just keep it that way because if they try to clean it up, the GOP are just going to shit on it again, so they might as well just let it stay shitty and let everybody just get used to it.

The other problem is that most of the time, Democrats agree.

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

These fucking species-traitors are trying to speedrun the end of human civilization, and they've convinced 40% of the country to cheer them on while they do it.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Their paymasters are very unsure about wanting humanity to survive:

Douthat: I think you would prefer the human race to endure, right?

Thiel: Uh ——

Douthat: You’re hesitating.

Thiel: Well, I don’t know. I would — I would ——

Douthat: This is a long hesitation!

Thiel: There’s so many questions implicit in this.

Douthat: Should the human race survive?

Thiel: Yes.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Thiel and that freak Curtis Yarvin are some very weird and fucked up people.

The Democrats need to bring back "weird" and in a very big way. That shit was working. Shine a spotlight on these weird motherfuckers and ask the normal American voter - do you really want this?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's about making "liberals" (meaning anyone even slightly to the left of Ronnie Raygun, I guess?) cry for the dumbdumbs that vote for the oligarchs to sell the country off.

For the stupid base and a lot of the elites that run the conservative "movement"/Republican Party, cruelty is the point. Making a shit-ton of money is the main point for the people getting the stupid base to vote against their own interests...even if they fuck over their own descendants...

[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

The term "maga" has no real meaning or guiding principles.

It's conservative Newspeak and sounds like baby-talk, which I think is no accident.

And the only thing that seems to outline what "maga" means is if it is something that makes Taco happy. Everything else is secondary, even if conservatives have completely reversed themselves on policies they supposedly held dear prior to learning how Taco feels on a given matter. The cons pretended to revere the military at one point. If Taco says those that serve are "suckers and losers", well, then, what Taco says is law, and cons have always been at war with the military, I guess. Until Taco needs a birthday parade...

[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Well in case you didn’t notice, I was ridiculing MAGA because everything Trunp does is worshipped by millions just because he does it - even if it’s something incredibly stupid and and/or tragic like logging National parks just to “stick it to Canada”.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, sorry, I completely noticed. None of that commentary was meant as a poor reflection on you or what you said. I was just "yes-and'ing" your comment, I guess. :)

[-] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Subsidies for coal and taxes on solar

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

The Republicans not only hate freedom, hate this country and most of the people in it, hate the rule of law, and hate the Constitution, they also hate humanity.

[-] evenglow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They hate not being the ones in control. That's it. Because they can't handle being afraid.

It's fear not hate.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

So many of them spend a lot of time and money on keeping the others in their group deeply afraid of their own shadow. So it's something caused by them. They aren't born that fearful, that kind of fear has to be curated.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
52 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25046 readers
724 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS