238

Rep. Nancy Mace announced she plans to support Rep. Jim Jordan to replace ousted House speaker Kevin McCarthy, whom she voted to remove from office last week. When pressed about the allegations that Jordan ignored sexual assaults by a team doctor while he was a wrestling coach at Ohio State University, the Republican congresswoman claimed to not “know anything” about the issue, despite it being widely reported.

“I know you’ve been outspoken about defending victims of sexual assault,” Face the Nation host Margaret Brennan said to Mace on Sunday. “Do the past allegations against Jim Jordan that he turned a blind eye to sexual abuse give you any reservations? How do you square that?”

“Yeah, I’m not familiar or aware with that,” Mace said. “He’s not indicted on anything that I’m aware of. And so I don’t, I don’t know anything, and I can’t speak to that.”

“I don’t know anything about that,” Mace continued. “What I do know is that I’ve been a very strong voice for women. I’ve talked to Jim Jordan and Steve Scalise about that. I’ve been a very strong advocate for rape victims.”

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

Jim Jordan is a full on clown. I've seen live house debates where he literally yelled nonsense at people. And that's the guy they want to be speaker of the house?

[-] hasnt_seen_goonies@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Yelling nonsense is a job requirement for his caucus.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

Only thing they care about

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 year ago

An idiot announces support for another idiot. What did it do? Get this dumbass's name into news headlines.

Note that on the other side of believing and endorsing pretty much every conspiracy theory on the books from elections to UFOs, this moron has been in Congress for 16 years and has done absolutely nothing productive. Rolling up his sleeves and throwing tantrums in lieu of any proper decorum for someone in his position doesn't count.

His entire mission in federal government has been to prevent federal government from functioning properly and then crying about how federal government doesn't function properly. He is the perfect model of the ideal GQP operative.

And that's of course not to mention old Gym being a spineless piece of shit who helped cover up the abuse of hundreds of athletes.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

But she's aware of the allegations now?

[-] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fucking exactly!

"I don't know anything about that."

"Well now you do. So what do you think about it?"

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

She'll have her people allegedly look at it.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago
[-] Brimos@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

The dumbass politician that vandalized her own home years ago in an attempt to stay relevant and play the victim card… https://twitter.com/bessbell/status/1399824925800636416?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1399824925800636416%7Ctwgr%5E1c8cb271bc477781f47bed25c647c91663ca0e85%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.snopes.com%2Ffact-check%2Fnancy-mace-rumor-alert%2F Also her father was some big wig military asshole… typical southern republican corrupt power-family bullshit. Nancy Mace can fuck right off.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Haha this dumb twat? I remember everyone being like who spray paints I cursive?!?!!

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Ohhhh yeah… she’s not wrong though haha (APAB)

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I believe she's the wife of Mace Windu.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Definitely not. No way would that bad motherfucker marry her.

[-] alabasterhotdog@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

My biggest socialedia pet peeve: why is it that those who know the least of a topic are the first to comment on it?

To add context to the answer below, its significant as she was one of the few Repubs who publicly blamed Trump for Jan 6, but she's been tacking hard right as of late.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah… my pet peeve is people who feel the need to say that first sentence. Like, can’t you just hold back to be civil?

[-] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

This ones my pet peeve 👆
/s

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[-] alabasterhotdog@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

Wasn't being uncivil, nor was that my intent, just clearly suggesting that if you don't know much about a topic, perhaps having some self-restraint and not commenting would be a better course for all.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

If you don’t ask questions, you can’t learn. Clearly education isn’t high on your list. You must be a conservative voter lmfao.

[-] alabasterhotdog@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

Clearly education isn't your priority, as you proudly make clear you don't have much of one. To turn it slightly uncivil, go be 14 years old elsewhere.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

How isn’t it? The question you’re complaining about was a question about who she was. A quest for education. That’s your pet peeve. Questions?

Go back to Reddit, where you belong.

[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Ignoring allegations of ignoring allegations? It’s almost too perfect.

[-] Jimbob0i0@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Coming soon... "I'm a very strong voice for women, and the allegations were about male wrestlers so they don't count. Men can be raped? Huh?"

[-] ripcord@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Boys. Boys were raped.

"Boys can be raped? Huh?"

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Republicans embrace pedophilia as long as they can pretend they don't know about it.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

She really said "I don't know" five times in row like that? WTF.

Edit. Read the article. This lady is absolutely delusional.

[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

How about we change that to "I don't know anything."

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Rep. Nancy Mace announced she plans to support Rep. Jim Jordan to replace ousted House speaker Kevin McCarthy, whom she voted to remove from office last week.

When pressed about the allegations that Jordan ignored sexual assaults by a team doctor while he was a wrestling coach at Ohio State University, the Republican congresswoman claimed to not “know anything” about the issue, despite it being widely reported.

“I know you’ve been outspoken about defending victims of sexual assault,” Face the Nation host Margaret Brennan said to Mace on Sunday.

Mace also noted she is working on a bill with Democratic Rep. Barbara Lee to address the large backlog of unprocessed rape kits.

Host Margaret Brennan pressed Mace on her endorsement, pointing out harsh words from former Rep. Liz Cheney, who recently cautioned Republicans not to elect Jordan speaker because he was the member of Congress who knew the most about Trump’s plans for Jan. 6.

Trump has been credibly accused of sexually assaulting multiple women, and lost not just one but two defamation suits brought by columnist E. Jean Carroll after he denied that he raped her in a department store dressing room in the 1990s.


The original article contains 686 words, the summary contains 196 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] IronpigsWizard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[-] bogo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These stories drive me insane. News media brings on a Republican who claims ignorance to some horrible thing.

The answer here is "ok thank you for coming in our program Representative Mace. You can return to our network when you've taken a look into this thing that's been in the public for years and have a comment on it. Until then you are no longer welcome on -insert network here-

Never invite them back. You are an elected official. You don't get to pick and choose what you have to answer.

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
238 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19089 readers
1412 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS