469
resistance (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 99 points 1 month ago
[-] dumbass@quokk.au 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

One person stopping a vehicle, the other judging the people in the vehicle like a disappointed parent.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 1 month ago

"Do your mothers know what you're doing?"

[-] dumbass@quokk.au 2 points 1 month ago

"Would your Grandmother be happy with you right now?"

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

"You aren't being the neighbor that Fred Rogers knew you could be!"

I'm always amazed at how powerful that single sentence is to almost all Americans.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 26 points 1 month ago

Direct link to the actual toot source.

The second image is a bit on the nose IMO. The comparison was clear enough from the original. And yeah maybe some people need it pointed out to them, but I suspect those people are also the ones who will reject the idea regardless.

[-] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago

There are probably some out there, especially younger people or those who have only recently started educating themselves, who simply haven't seen the second image before.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago

Maybe, but I'd say if they don't know Tank Man, seeing it in this context without further explanation is still unhelpful. Because they're likely to think it's a photo taken in America today.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago

I'm just thinking about the Venn diagram of people who know who George Takei is, are of the right kind of mind that they would actually see the link between the two images, but have not seen the second image.

[-] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

Probably not a huge overlap but then again adding it for even just a few doesn't do any harm.

not to mention the amount of people who dont know its a still of a video with tiananmen square in the background.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 1 month ago

i didn't even see the guy in the first picture until i looked at the second and realized what i should be looking for

[-] lerky@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 4 weeks ago

Good intentions and all, but the full video context (the vehicle just keeps going and the blocker moves out of the way after several seconds of nudging) makes this a terrible example that only reinforces the sense of futility, in my opinion.

Not saying not to stand and fight, but this isn't the posterchild to use.

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 22 points 4 weeks ago

Perception is more powerful than reality. You think the tankman from china actually accomplished much. But he is still a symbol today.

[-] lerky@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 weeks ago

I realize that. But there are countless current examples of real resistance and sacrifice that could have been used instead.

[-] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 weeks ago

Okay post a really good picture right here in the thread.

[-] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

I still find it so odd the tank didn't want to run him over, when just the day before they had tanks running over hundreds of bodies over and over to the point where they could just spray the remains with a fire hose into the sewer.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 weeks ago

It's more than any of us have done. Often, genuine actions and words are much stronger than any impact they may initially have.

[-] lerky@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 weeks ago

Nothing about how this was presented is genuine though, and that's my point.

And plenty have done more. People are constantly martyred fighting back, in part because they have been actually willing to die for their cause. Any one of them could have been used as a more authentic representation of resistance than this... and have more of an impact because it's not a cherry-picked, out-of-context fabrication.

I realize we're post-truth, but jeez.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 10 points 1 month ago

Tankman travels through time!

[-] lol_idk@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Wait until the tankies come in here and tell you this guy was trying to stop them from leaving and asking them to go back and detain more immigrants while also claiming there were no immigrants there anyways

If you are talking about tank man i can just show you you can clearly see tiananmen square in the background and the direction the tanks are going and where the guy is pointing.

[-] noodlejetski@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

can't wait for that one guy from .ml to show up and argue that Tiananmen Square was a peaceful protest and post links claiming that there were no deaths recorded there.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You dont need to make a strawman of what mls believe, you can just quote the wikipedia and ignore the claims by countries that have a reason to fabricate hostile evidence. If you want to go further, look at testimonies by witnesses that corroborate the side opposed to where they currently live.

Its also important to try to understand why the chinese feel the issue is contentious and the various perspectives, as opposed to letting the other side tell you how the chinese feel and why.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago

There is no positive justification for tanks on a city street what the fuck are you even talking about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There were no deaths recorded there though. Here is what a reporter of the washington post who was in Beijing at the time says about that.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 4 weeks ago

IIRC, The chinese government say 200 something died, and presumably they have more information than a wapo reporter, since they can ask the hospitals and witnesses to verify the police and military reports.

[-] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 4 weeks ago
[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Some minister, 15 days after the events, according to a paywalled book in 1998, according to wikipedia.

The death toll was certainly greater than zero, theres pictures of dead soldiers and like 2 dozen protestors in the streets surrounding the square.

[-] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 4 weeks ago

Ive read parts of the wikipedia page on it and it says the chinese gov states there were around 20 soldiers killed, but it doesnt mention civilians killed, plus a bunch of injured people. That minister really says something about 200 dead?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Pandantic@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago
[-] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 1 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
469 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

8843 readers
645 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS