22
Linux Distros for Gaming: CachyOS is Taking over (ProtonDB data) (videos.abnormalbeings.space)
submitted 6 months ago by AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.abnormalbeings.space/post/6562285

Companion article here: https://boilingsteam.com/distro-for-gaming-cachy-os-takes-over/

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] who@feddit.org 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

CachyOS claims performance improvement by compiling its packages with CPU-family-specific optimizations. Okay, but most games are not CPU bound, and even those that are mostly spend their CPU time in game code, not distro package-provided code.

CachyOS claims interactivity improvement by using the BORE scheduler. Okay, but that's unlikely to help games unless you're running other tasks that compete for CPU time while you play.

So for most gamers, I wouldn't expect CachyOS to offer much improvement in either area.

[-] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

This is the one true CachyOS description. The distro has been gaining so much traction based on naive interpretations of what performance is.

It’s not a bad distro, but its advantages are minimal over others. Whatever linux people pick, it will be fine.

[-] Tundra@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago

seems to be specific games, kingdom come deliverance (the original) stuttered & hitched badly on other distros, but cachy was 👌

[-] who@feddit.org 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If you post your system specs and the distros that had that problem, it might help someone else who runs into the same thing. Or it might even hint at a cause more specific than "wasn't running CachyOS".

[-] dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 months ago

I don't get it, CachyOS is probably improving performance in the low single digit percentages. Why are people so crazy about it?

[-] AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space 2 points 6 months ago

I don't think it does much for gaming, as the video and article also point out, but even if it turns out to just be placebo - my old and creaking PC here feels more responsive than it did with Manjaro, Vanilla Arch and Garuda respectively.

[-] dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah, it always reminds me that I did a kernel benchmark for gaming a couple of years ago and the differences were within the margin of error. https://web.archive.org/web/20220602144244/https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/utfazn/results_for_the_kernel_benchmarks_in_gaming/

[-] BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 months ago

CachyOS is a really good time to use.

Very sane defaults, no bloat, extremely easy snapper/btrfs/limine setup, a 1-click gaming setup button that gets everything you need ready to go.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

I tried a few Linux distros and Cachy has been the most painless so far.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 6 months ago

I tried CatchyOS for a HTPC and really liked the UX, but can't remember what happened with it, something broke or couldn't do something, and settled for Bazzite and it's have been working good so far.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The data ☝️

I'm always surprised by how low the Flatpak share is.

[-] vividspecter@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago

The sandboxing sometimes breaks applications or requires additional configuration. And I don't like that it's a separate thing I need to maintain, although some package managers pair main package updates etc together.

And as a NixOS user, I prefer to use nix to handle as much of my system as possible, although flatpak at least is useful as a fallback in a pinch. Of course, this is a niche within a niche and mainstream users, particularly those using immutable distros can and do benefit from flatpak.

[-] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

Imagine having a 40% market share and losing it all. Honestly, it's kind of incredible how far Ubuntu has fallen. Hopefully it serves as a lesson for anyone thinking about alienating their users.

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

3.1% NixOS... that's barely a step below Debian at 3.4%. Is Nix really that popular?

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Despite the changes around them, both Nobara and Bazzite seem to keep hanging on at a stable share, close to 5% each. However it seems that both have stopped growing at that point and may be stuck at the current threshold. I’m not sure there is however much future when it comes to Bazzite, since SteamOS will eventually be rolling out to more and more devices out there. I guess it depends how much Valve does in terms of hardware support, and if Bazzite provide tangible benefits on top what Valve delivers.

I mean, Nobara is definitely steady or losing some of its share but Bazzite has only ever continued to gain, even if a bit slower now. As far as if it has benefits over SteamOS, well the Steam Deck is the largest percentage of Bazzite users by far, so it's clearly offering something that Valve isn't. I'd say that it's a lot simpler OOTB to set up other store's games with Lutris included.

[-] janNatan@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Plus, Bazzite doesn't have the same hardware requirements. I have a handheld device that can't install SteamOS because of an incompatible hard drive, but Bazzite works just fine.

[-] Defaced@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Love cachyOS, I don't pay much attention to the claimed performance improvements. I just think it has some really good defaults and in-house tools for beginners that make navigating an Arch distro easier.

[-] WereCat@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Gave CachyOS a try over weekend and I'm back to Fedora. It's not really appealing to me at all but I can see why people like it.

[-] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

I'm genuinely happy to see people trying out new stuff! I like seeing all the new approaches every distro takes, understanding real use cases, making interesting design decisions at each turn.

This is what it used to be like to be a PC enthusiast and I think it's great to see computing become personal again.

Now CachyOS I've been following for a while and it seems much closer to something like endeavor which is still prone to all the potential issues I've experienced before. I've moved to ublue Bazzite and bluefin recently because the out of box experience is amazing and updates are pretty much immaculate.

I still don't understand what Cachy does in its kernel optimization and BORE scheduler properly but I'd love to learn and understand.

Either way, I_see_this_as_an_absolute_win.gif

[-] coke38@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Funny that I see an article about CachyOS, i just installed it this morning because of some trouble with an RX 9060 XT that I couldn't get it to work with kubuntu. It just worked out of the box with CachyOS. I know it would probably have worked with other distro but still...

[-] Auth@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

That is likely due to the RX9000 lineup needing the newer kernel for driver support. Kubuntu maybe didnt ship that 6.14 kernel at the time. Cachy is the best for new hardware because they have great tools for switching kernels and patching everything up to the bleeding edge. They make it easy to grab the latest kernel, mesa, nvidia driver or whatever you need for new hardware.

[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago

I didn't know Pop_OS was no longer being updated. I know I've had recent updates though. Perhaps I should switch distros.

[-] pcn@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

The work on cosmic is proceeding and as far as I know when cosmic is done, 24.04 will be released. In the mean time 22.04 still gets updates.

[-] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca -1 points 6 months ago

glad more people are using Arch-based distros! I finally installed arch (btw) without the archinstall script, and I must say, the more people that can potentially feel the sense of accomplishment that I felt when I got my display manager and window manager set up the way I wanted, the better!

[-] gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com -2 points 6 months ago

I keep hearing this, but I don't really want an Arch-based distro because I don't want fixing my computer to become a hobby. I have a 10-year-old PC running Debian 12 that can still play (some) games that came out this year, so it doesn't feel like I should switch.

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 6 months ago

Isn't SteamOS Arch-based?

[-] Auth@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Yes its based on arch packages but its not the same as when people say "arch based distro" because SteamOS doesn't inherit the arch problems because its not on archs update schedule. While other arch based distro's follow the arch schedule and get all the issues that come with bleeding edge software.

[-] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I finally switched from Windows to Linux and chose CachyOS. This was months ago. I never had to fix anything (so far). There was a fuck up by me once, but that wasn't the distros and could've happened on any distro. Honestly couldn't be happier with it being arch based, as it's really nice to basically get anything that is released instantly as a package update.

I haven't had to hunt for packages that aren't years old for anything as I was used to on Debian (used on most of my servers). And while the AUR is there, I think I got a total of two things installed from there, anything else was just there in the repos.

But if you've got a setup that already works, and you're happy with, why change anything? Having something that works for you is what makes the large amounts of choices in the Linux world so great.

[-] rowinxavier@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I have found that with Arch I don't run out of troubleshooting before the problem is solved like I did with Debian. That said, the learning curve is a little steep so not switching makes sense, but I find it better personally. Just like in Windows things are out of your control I felt that Debian had strong defaults and I had trouble changing them too far. I am sure ignorance played a role but I have found the documentation on the Arch wiki was more useful in actually solving my problems.

[-] d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago

Fwiw I was avoidant of arch for a long time and took the deep dive a few years back. I've really not had to do any more debugging work than I have to with Debian (which I'm also a fan of and use).

EndeavourOS helps a lot with smoothing over the possible gotchas and my machines with it tend to run steam games (proton or native) out of the box the majority of the time.

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago

Same. I tried arch many moons ago and heard all the stories and that was enough.

Maybe it's better by now but fedora has been stable and things like bazzite with immutability exist. Not sure why I'd pick cachy then. Especially if the gains are that minimal.

[-] dil@piefed.zip 2 points 6 months ago

I like the aur, only reason i stayed on cachyos instead of trying bazzite, def won't find everything as a flatpak.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

Linux Gaming

23641 readers
53 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
monolalia@lemmy.world