44

Jeffrey Epstein’s Birthday Album Included Letters From Bill Clinton, Leon Black

Former president, Wall Street billionaire were listed along with Donald Trump as ‘friends’ in the 2003 book’s table of contents, which named around five dozen contributors

By Khadeeja Safdar and Joe Palazzolo

In the end, she was successful. The leather-bound album—assembled before Epstein was first arrested in 2006—included a page with a single paragraph in Clinton’s distinctive scrawl:

It’s reassuring isn’t it, to have lasted as long, across all the years of learning and knowing, adventures and [illegible word], and also to have your childlike curiosity, the drive to make a difference and the solace of friends.

A spokesman for Clinton declined to comment on the birthday message, which was reviewed by the Journal. He referred the Journal to a previous statement that the former president had cut off ties more than a decade before Epstein was arrested in 2019 and didn’t know about Epstein’s alleged crimes.

The former president was among around five dozen people, including Donald Trump, Wall Street billionaire Leon Black, fashion designer Vera Wang and media owner Mort Zuckerman, who ended up with letters in the 2003 book, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

The letter bearing Trump’s signature, which had the outline of a naked woman, was one of the more memorable pages, according to the people involved in putting the album together. Trump has called the letter “a fake thing.”

The professionally bound birthday book had multiple volumes and included a table of contents that listed the contributions, organized into groups. While many letter writers weren’t famous, some categories had notable people.

Clinton and Trump were listed under the “Friends” group, along with about 20 other associates such as Black, Zuckerman, former Victoria’s Secret leader Leslie Wexner, attorney Alan Dershowitz, and the late Jean-Luc Brunel, who ran a modeling agency. Zuckerman didn’t respond to requests for comment.

A “Business” group included the late Alan “Ace” Greenberg and the late James “Jimmy” Cayne. Both men worked at Bear Stearns when Epstein was at the investment bank in the 1970s.

Other people were grouped under categories such as “Science,” “Brooklyn” and “Family.”

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

Okay. If they did criminal shit with Epstein, put them in jail. Seems pretty cut and dry to me

[-] criss_cross@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. He should also rot in jail and suffer consequences.

It also cuts the bullshit “Epstein files are a Clinton conspiracy”

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

It’s so funny how Murdoch is like “BoTH siDEs!!!!” And Democrats are like, yeah if Bill Clinton is a pedo throw him in jail. That’s the difference between the two sides, dumbass.

[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago

That is NOT true! If Bill Clinton Raped Children the GOP would have Released the Files! So BILL CLINTON NEVER RAPED CHILDREN! THANK YOU GOP!

[-] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck it, publish them. Publish them all

[-] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

He's going to give Maxwell a pardon, she's going to testify that Trump had no connection to Epstein, Americans are going to be angry on the internet for a week and MAYBE go to a "peaceful protest" (if they can get the proper permits, it's on a weekend, and the weather is nice) before bending over and accepting this, too- reassuring themselves that there's a red line somewhere down the road beyond which they might consider taking some action.

[-] Dragomus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I am convinced Trump is one of the most named names in the epstein files, not only that, there most likely is ample direct (video) evidence of him abusing children...
And this is the reason not only he but all of his team need this suppressed with the utmost urgency.
Because if it leaks it is all over for the administration, it will fall and new elections will wipe all of project 2025's grand scheme out.

Now the scramble is on, flagging and erasing Trumps name from the files won't do since there are copies out there outside of the administration's control.

So to safeguard the whole administration they must find and use any other solution to put this in a box and make it dissappear from the public eye.

They indeed will get Maxwell to say Trump was never close to epstein, that they split up their paths since Trump stepped on the TV show floor or whatever. Promise Maxwell a pardon and a huge stack of crypto if she "does the right thing". Toss in some taxpayer money for a new identity and she can live where she wants.

And Trump himself will rapidly throw about more insanity than the public can sort through, perhaps even go ahead and arrest President Obama. So all interest in the epstein files dies down with a bit of time and project 2025 is out of jeopardy.

Half of the populace will eat up the drama for a while and enjoy themselves, the other half will strike a protest here and there until that also dies down.

[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 weeks ago

He's going to give Maxwell a pardon

I highly doubt that: the way this whole affair is now framed, it would be a screaming admission of guilt.

That's the amusing twist with Ghislaine Maxwell: Trump is dammed of he does and dammed of he doesn't.

If I was her, I'd string Trump along, promising to absolve him of any wrongdoing publicly in front of a camera, then tell the real truth and blow up his presidency, to gun for a pardon from the next administration.

At the very least, she'd get some sympathy points from the general public. Because she sure ain't gonna get nothing from Trump himself.

[-] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

“If I do X I’ll look guilty” is absolutely not a consideration that has ever cost Trump an hour’s sleep. 1) he lacks the self-awareness, 2) he knows the GOP will allow it, and 3) he knows US citizens have zero spine

[-] TheFogan@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly wish they had reported on all of them at the same time immidiately. Watch maga go I knew it was real... and... fake at the same time.

[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

flush every turd

[-] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

anything from Obama, Biden, or Harris?

Bill Clinton hasn’t been a Democratic candidate for almost 30 years

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

And he was rightfully impeached.

[-] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 5 points 2 weeks ago

For something COMPLETELY different, mind you. He got in trouble for lying about coercing his adult secretary into giving him head. Just the lying part. And nothing really happened to him. If (probably is tbh) there's pedo shit, then he has gotten off scot free. This man was giving speeches for Kamala. That probably didn't help anything.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 2 weeks ago

It turns out that Bill Clinton was being black mailed by Israel over having sex with Lewinsky. Him being impeached removed that leverage. https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-said-to-have-offered-lewinsky-tapes-for-pollard/

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
44 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25174 readers
642 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS