176
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fetus@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago

Typical, kicking the can down the road instead of actually fixing the problem. And what happens 292 billion years from now when we all go through this again, huh?

[-] archonet@lemy.lol 25 points 1 day ago

Thankfully, humans are on track to all be very dead by then.

[-] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago

At this rate we might not even reach 2038

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Hopefully..

[-] MTK@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

And what will we do when we get to December 4th, 292,277,026,596 AD, at 20:10:55 UTC?????

They'll switch to a 128 bit integer, completely breaking backwards compatibility.

[-] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago

Some Debian installs are used for 10+ years, so makes a lot of sense to do it now.

[-] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

Finally learning some lessons!

The century date problem as it was known before Y2K was first described in the 1950s but people assumed it would be a moot point long before it was a problem.

When some of those mainframes were still in use in the 70s it was brought up again but nothing was done because it was assumed that it would be a moot point long before it was a problem.

When some of those mainframes or software were still in use (banks, oil companies, the IRS, etc) in the 90s it was finally seen a as a problem and cost billions of dollars to fix.

Then it happened again in 2020 because it turns out that the fix was to kick the can down the road again.

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

And dorks like to say smart watches don’t need 64 bit.

this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
176 points (98.9% liked)

Hacker News

2099 readers
641 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS